Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04436380

Retrospective Study of Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia Who Relapsed After Immunosuppressive Therapy

Background:

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a form of bone marrow failure. It usually results from a

cytotoxic T cell attack on the marrow stem cell. Two treatments can be used for most people with SAA. One is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The other is immunosuppressive treatment (IST). For people who are treated with IST, relapse can occur. If this happens, they can have HSCT or be re-treated with IST. The two most common IST regimes used for relapsed SAA are rabbit ATG (rATG) and alemtuzumab. Both rATG and alemtuzumab have similar response rates and survival rates. There is not much long-term data on people who need repeat IST treatment due to relapse. Researchers want to look at data from past studies to learn more.

Objective:

To compare the data of relapsed SAA patients between those who received alemtuzumab versus rATG for repeat IST treatment.

Eligibility:

Adults and children with SAA who were enrolled on NHLBI protocol 12-H-0150, 06-H-0034, 05-H-0242, 03-H-0249, 03-H-0193, 00-H-0032, or 90-H-0146

Design:

This study uses data from past studies. The participants in those studies have allowed their data to be used in future research.

Researchers will review participants medical records. They will collect clinical data, such as notes, test results, and imaging scans. They will also collect the research data gathered as part of the original study.

Researchers will enter the data into an in-house database. It is password protected. All data will be kept in secure network drives or in secure sites.

Other studies may be added in the future....

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States

About this study

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a form of bone marrow failure and in most cases is the result of a cytotoxic T cell attack on the marrow stem cell. It is effectively treated in most patients with either immunosuppressive treatment (IST) or upfront allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, in patients who are treated with IST, relapse remains an issue with a rate of 30-40%. Once relapsed, patients can be either re-treated with IST or undergo HSCT. The two most common IST regimes used for relapsed SAA are rabbit ATG (rATG) and alemtuzumab. Both rATG and alemtuzumab have been shown to have a response rate of approximately 60% in relapsed patients with similar overall survival rates of 83-85%. Previous predictors of relapse include time from diagnosis to IST, and early response to IST. Few long-term data exist on patients requiring repeat IST treatment due to relapse.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • This is a retrospective chart review. The investigators will review the medical records of adults and children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) enrolled on immunosuppressive therapy (IST) treatment protocols in the NHLBI.

Patients who opted out of future use of data on their prior studies will be excluded from this study.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of long-term outcomes of relapsed patients who received repeat IST

    Time frame: Between the Period of 1990 to 2020

    Characteristics and outcomes of relapsed SAA patients between those who received alemtuzumab versus rATG for repeat IST

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical predictors for the development of relapse

    Time frame: Between the Period of 1990 to 2020

    Clinical predictors for the development of relapse such as age, gender, baseline laboratory values, time from diagnosis to initial treatment, and initial treatment received.

  2. Rates of clonal evolution between relapsed patients depending on type of IST received and number of IST rounds required

    Time frame: Between the Period of 1990 to 2020

    Compare rates of clonal evolution between relapsed patients depending on type of IST received and number of IST rounds required.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Nih

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jun 18, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 16, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.