Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03520114

Retropubic vs. Single-Incision Mid-Urethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

One in five women will undergo prolapse surgery in their lifetime, and there is a strong correlation between prolapse and urinary incontinence. Pelvic floor surgeons aspire to improve relevant quality of life outcomes for women with pelvic floor disorders while minimizing complications and unnecessary procedures. There has been an experience of disappointment and frustration when a patient returns following POP repair with new symptoms of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) that she ranks as a greater disruption to her quality of life than her original vaginal bulge. While retropubic (RP) slings are considered to be the "gold-standard" referent for other slings with long-term outcomes data, they are associated with the highest risks of intra- and post-operative complications including bladder injury, bleeding, and post-operative voiding dysfunction. Single-incision slings (SIS) are the latest iteration in sling development that build upon the benefits of slings but avoid passage through the muscles of the inner thigh. The hypothesis for this study is that single-incision slings (Altis) are non-inferior to Retropubic mid-urethral slings when placed at the time of native tissue vaginal repair.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

MedStar Health/National Center for Advance Pelvic Surgery, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Pelvic floor surgeons aspire to improve relevant quality of life outcomes for women with pelvic floor disorders while minimizing complications and unnecessary procedures. Efficacy and risk always compete for equilibrium. Level I evidence has demonstrated a positive efficacy benefit of a concomitant synthetic mid-urethral sling in women with, and without, pre-operative symptoms of SUI who are undergoing POP repair. Concomitant sling placement has been shown to reduce the risk of de novo or persistent SUI from 50% to 23%. The combination of surgical treatment of POP and SUI at the same time, however, increases the risk of incomplete bladder emptying. While retropubic (RP) slings are considered to be the "gold-standard" referent for other slings with long-term outcomes data, they are associated with the highest risks of intra- and post-operative complications including bladder injury, bleeding, and post-operative voiding dysfunction. Single-incision slings (SIS) are the latest iteration in sling development that build upon the benefits of slings but avoid passage through the muscles of the inner thigh. As the combination of POP and sling surgery increases the risk of voiding dysfunction, and rates of incomplete bladder emptying appear significantly lower for SIS than RP slings, the study team hypothesizes that the use of the Single-incision Mid-Urethral Sling SIS will be non-inferior to RP slings in efficacy and superior in irritative voiding symptoms/voiding dysfunction at one year after combined surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 21 years of age
  • Women being considered for a native tissue vaginal repair in any vaginal compartment or colpocleisis
  • POP ≥ stage II of any vaginal compartment, according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system
  • Vaginal bulge symptoms
  • Positive standardized cough stress test on clinical examination, or on urodynamic testing
  • Surgical plan that includes a native tissue vaginal repair including colpocleisis for symptomatic POP in any compartment
  • Understanding and acceptance of the need to return for all scheduled follow-up visits
  • English speaking and able to give informed consent
  • Willing and able to complete all study questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence
  • Status post reconstructive pelvic surgery with transvaginal mesh kits or sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh for prolapse
  • Any serious disease, or chronic condition, that could interfere with the study compliance
  • Unwilling to have a synthetic sling
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Pregnancy or planning pregnancy in the first postoperative year
  • Untreated urinary tract infection (may be included after resolution)
  • Poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus (HgbA1c > 9 within 3 months of surgery date)
  • Prior pelvic radiation
  • Incarcerated
  • Neurogenic bladder/ pre-operative self-catheterization
  • Elevated post-void residual (>150 ml) that does not resolve with prolapse reduction testing (pessary, prolapse reduced uroflow or micturition study)
  • Prior augmented (synthetic mesh, autologous graft, xenograft, allograft) prolapse repair
  • Planned concomitant bowel related surgery including sphincteroplasty and perineal rectal prolapse surgery, rectovaginal fistula repair, hemorrhoidectomy.

Treatment and study plan

RP sling placement

Device

A 1.5 cm incision will be made at the mid-urethra through a separate vaginal incision with lateral dissection with Metzembaum scissors. After placement of both trocars, cystoscopy with a 70-degree scope will be performed to assess for bladder and urethral injury. Surgeons will set the tension of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) slings so that a spacer can be placed between the sling and the urethra. Sling tensioning will be performed after anterior and apical prolapse is corrected.

SIS placement

Device

The sling is introduced through a single anterior vaginal incision of 1.5 cm at the mid-urethra. The sling/needle assembly is advanced behind the ischiopubic rami in a transobturator trajectory toward the obturator space bilaterally. The needle is then removed by simply sliding the fixating tip back out. The other side is then completed in an identical fashion. After the fixation of the two anchors at the 2 and 10 o'clock positions, the patient's bladder is filled with 250 mL of Sodium Chloride (NaCl). Afterward, an intraoperative crede maneuver is performed and the tension adjustment suture is pulled, when necessary, to achieve the desired continence. The mesh will lie in direct apposition to the urethra. The adjustment thread is then cut short and the vaginal incision is closed with an absorbable suture.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Subjectively Bothersome Stress Incontinence

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Dichotomous outcome (Yes/No), measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit

  2. Count of Participants Needing Retreatment for Stress Incontinence

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    This includes pelvic floor physical therapy; incontinence pessary; urethral bulking injection; repeat incontinence surgery.

  3. Count of Participants With De Novo or Worsening Urge Incontinence Symptoms

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Dichotomous outcome (Yes/No), measured by a worsening change in response to Question 16 on PFDI-20 with at least somewhat bothersome symptoms. Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit

  4. Count of Participants Requiring Bladder Drainage

    Time frame: 12 Month post-operatively

    Beyond 2 weeks post-operatively with PVR > 150 ml OR > 1/3 total voided volume up to 12 Month post-operatively..

  5. Count of Participants Needing Surgical Intervention for Urinary Retention

    Time frame: 12 Month post-operatively

    Sling lysis or revision at any time point post-operatively up to 12 Month post-operatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Reporting of adverse events intra- and post-operatively and include adverse events as measured by the Dindo classification system.

  2. Surgeon Satisfaction Scores

    Time frame: post-operatively up to 12 months

    Surgeon satisfaction with the sling will be assessed with a 10-point Likert Scale. The scale has a score range of 0-10, with 0=no satisfaction 10=extremely satisfied.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Other

Collaborators

  • Foundation for Female Health Awareness

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial of Retropubic Versus Single-incision Mid-Urethral Sling (Altis ) for Concomitant Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence During Native Tissue Vaginal Repair

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 9, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.