Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05146700

Restrictive Vs. Liberal Oxygen in Trauma

Victims of trauma are often healthy individuals prior to the incident, but acquire numerous complications including sepsis and pulmonary complications and diminished quality of life after trauma. According to Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines, all severely injured trauma patients should receive supplemental oxygen.

The objective of TRAUMOX2 is to compare the effect of a restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategy the first eight hours following trauma on the incidence of 30-day mortality and/or major respiratory complications (pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome) within 30 days (combined primary endpoint).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In trauma resuscitation, supplemental oxygen is often administered both to treat and prevent hypoxemia as recommended both by the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) manual and the Pre-hospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) manual. Oxygen is administered in many other situations too, sometimes in a non-consistent manner and very often without even being prescribed. In a recent systematic review, our group found the evidence both for and against the use of supplemental oxygen in the trauma population to be extremely sparse. However, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis comparing liberal versus restrictive oxygen strategy for a broad mix of acutely ill medical and surgical patients found an association between liberal oxygen administration and increased mortality. Of note, only one small study on trauma patients (patients with traumatic brain injury), which did not report mortality data, was included. Conversely, this study showed that degree of disability was significantly reduced at six months in the group receiving liberal compared to restrictive oxygen.

In mechanically ventilated patients hyperoxemia is commonly observed (16-50%), and hyperoxemia is a common finding in trauma patients in general. In addition to mortality, hyperoxemia has been associated with major pulmonary complications in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as well as in surgical patients. For example, a recent retrospective study found hyperoxemia to be an independent risk factor for ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Nevertheless, a highly debated recommendation from the World Health Organisation strongly recommends that adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgical procedures receive a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 80% intraoperatively as well as in the immediate postoperative period for two to six hours to reduce the risk of surgical site infection. Furthermore, a study on 152,000 mechanically ventilated patients found no association between hyperoxia and mortality during the first 24 hours in the ICU, and another study on 14,000 mixed ICU patients found that a partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) of approximately 18 kPa resulted in the lowest mortality. Finally, a recent study randomized 2928 ICU patients to either low or high oxygenation (defined as 8 vs 12 kPa) for a maximum of 90 days and found no difference in mortality. Therefore, whether the trauma population could benefit from a more restrictive supplemental oxygen approach than recommended by current international guidelines presents a large and important knowledge gap.

In a recent pilot randomized clinical trial (TRAUMOX1, ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number: NCT03491644), we compared a restrictive and a liberal oxygen strategy for 24 hours after trauma (N = 41) and found maintenance of normoxemia following trauma using a restrictive oxygen strategy to be feasible. TRAUMOX1 served as the basis for this larger trial. We experienced 24 hours to be slightly excessive to represent only the acute phase post trauma for which reason we have shortened the time-period to eight hours in TRAUMOX2. Furthermore, we found that several physicians had important concerns with the high dosage of oxygen in the liberal arm for which reason the concentration will be reduced. Finally, we did not randomize trauma patients in the pre-hospital phase, but instead on arrival at the trauma bay (median [interquartile range (IQR)] time to randomization: 7 [4-10] minutes, median [IQR] time from trauma to trauma bay arrival: 51 [29.0-67.5] minutes). To limit this inconsistent exposure to oxygen in the pre-hospital phase prior to inclusion we will initiate the intervention in the pre-hospital phase where possible in TRAUMOX2.

The objective of TRAUMOX2 is to compare the effect of a restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategy the first eight hours following trauma on the incidence of 30-day mortality and/or major respiratory complications (pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome) within 30 days (combined primary endpoint).

We hypothesize that a restrictive compared to a liberal oxygen strategy for the initial eight hours after trauma will result in a lower rate of 30-day mortality and/or major respiratory complications (pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome) within 30 days (combined primary endpoint).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥18 years, including fertile women
  • Blunt or penetrating trauma mechanism
  • Direct transfer from the scene of accident to one of the participating trauma centers
  • Trauma team activation
  • The enrolling physician must initially expect a hospital length of stay for 24 hours or longer

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients in cardiac arrest before or on admission
  • Patients with a suspicion of carbon monoxide intoxication
  • Patients with no/minor injuries after secondary survey will be excluded if they are expected to be discharged <24 hours

Treatment and study plan

Restrictive oxygen

Drug

Lowest oxygen delivery possible (≥21%) ensuring an SpO2 target = 94%

Liberal Oxygen

Drug

15 L O2/min flow for non-intubated trial participants or FiO2 = 1.0 for intubated trial participants in the initial phase; later in the operating room, intensive care unit, post-anesthesia care unit and ward, the flow/FiO2 can be reduced to ≥12 L O2/min or FiO2 ≥0.6 if the arterial oxygen saturation is ≥98%

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of 30-day mortality and/or major respiratory complications (pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome) within 30 days (combined primary endpoint)

    Time frame: Day 30 after enrollment

    The assessment of the major respiratory complications will be performed by at least two allocation blinded primary outcome assessors (specialists in anesthesiology, intensive care, emergency medicine or similar); blinding will be ensured by concealing all information indicative of the allocation prior to assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30-day mortality

    Time frame: Day 30 after enrollment

    Assessed in the patient's medical record/register

  2. 12-month mortality

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

    Assessed in the patient's medical record/register

  3. Major respiratory complications (pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome) within 30 days

    Time frame: Day 30 after enrollment

    Data from the combined primary endpoint assessment

  4. Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: From date of admission to discharge from the hospital, up to 12 months after enrollment

    Number of days

  5. ICU length of stay

    Time frame: From date of admission to discharge from the ICU, up to 12 months after enrollment

    Number of days

  6. Time on mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From initiation of mechanical ventilation to being ventilator-free within 30 days after enrollment

    Number of hours; only mechanical ventilation in the ICU should be considered

  7. Days alive outside the ICU

    Time frame: ICU-free days within 30 days after enrollment

    Number of days

  8. Days alive without mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Ventilator-free days within 30 days after enrollment

    Number of days; only mechanical ventilation in the ICU should be considered

  9. Re-intubations

    Time frame: Within 30 days after enrollment

    Number of re-intubations; only re-intubations in the ICU should be considered

  10. Pneumonia post-discharge

    Time frame: From discharge to a maximum of 30 days after enrollment

    Number of trial participants; evaluated through medicines prescribed after hospital discharge in countries where this information is available

  11. Episode(s) of hypoxemia during intervention (saturation <90%)

    Time frame: During the 8 hours of the oxygen intervention arms

    Defined as number of times the valid oxygen saturation is below 90%; if it is below 90%, above 90% and below 90% again, then it should be registered as 2 episodes

  12. Surgical site infections

    Time frame: Within 30 days after enrollment

    Defined as per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for a surgical site infection event

  13. 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) score

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-trauma

    Conducted through a telephone interview where the patient is asked to indicate his/her health state

    The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)

    The EQ-5D descriptive system consists of a scale (minimum score = 5 and maximum score = 25) where the lowest score (5) indicates no problems whereas the highest score (25) indicates extreme problems

    The EQ VAS (visual analogue scale) records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled "The worst health you can imagine" (minimum score = 0) and "The best health you can imagine' (maximum score = 100)

  14. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-trauma

    Conducted through a telephone interview where the patient/patient's next-of-kin/caretaker is interviewed through a structured questionnaire to assess the functional recovery after trauma

    The GOSE consists of a scale (minimum value = 1 and maximum value = 8); each patient given a score based on the interview:

    1 = Death, 2 = Vegetative state, 3 = Lower severe disability, 4 = Upper severe disability, 5 = Lower moderate disability, 6 = Upper moderate disability, 7 = Lower good recovery, 8 = Upper good recovery

  15. Levels of oxidative stress biomarkers, primarily malondialdehyde (MDA) at hour 24

    Time frame: Hour 0, hour 8, hour 24 and hour 48 after enrollment

    The unit of the oxidative stress biomarker depends on the chosen analysis of the specific biomarker

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Other

Collaborators

  • The Novo Nordic Foundation

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing Restrictive Vs. Liberal Oxygen Strategies for Trauma Patients: the TRAUMOX2 Trial

Acronym: TRAUMOX2

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 7, 2021
Registry last updated
Oct 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.