Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00832754

Restricting the Use of Artesunate Plus Amodiaquine Combination Therapy to Malaria Cases Confirmed by a Dipstick Test: A Cluster Randomised Control Trial

Effective use of Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) depends on the accuracy and safety of RDT based treatment practices and on factors related to the health delivery system. We propose to study the accuracy and safety of RDT based diagnosis and treatment of febrile illness, health system determinants of effective use of RDTs and the public health outcomes of RDT based ACT for malaria.A cluster randomised trial of RDT based versus clinical judgment based treatment of febrile illness on the incidence of malaria in <48 month old children will be conducted. Health Centres will be randomly allocated to RDT based treatment or clinical judgment based treatment arm and children under 2years of age from the catchment area of each health centre will be followed for 2 years. The cost effectiveness of RDT based approach will be compare with the clinical judgement based treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

Up to 48 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Kintampo Health Research Center

Kintampo, BAR, 200, Ghana

About this study

Two-stage, four component study Stage I - Component A: Accuracy of RDT and the outcome of treatment based on RDT results Primary outcome:What is the sensitivity and specificity of Paracheck cassettes in Ghana to diagnose malaria?

Stage 1 - Component B: delivery system determinants of effective RDT based ACT Primary outcome: What are the delivery system determinants of effective RDT based ACT?

Stage 2 - Component A: effects of restricted use of ACTs based on RDT results: a randomised controlled trial Primary outcome: Incidence of malaria (fever + any level of parasite density) in < 48 month-old children

Stage 2 - component B: Cost effectiveness analysis:

Primary outcome:What is the cost effectiveness of RDT based ACT for treatment of children under 4 years compared with ACT based on clinical judgement?

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All children aged less than 48mths reporting to health center with suspected malaria

Exclusion criteria

  • Children having chronic illnesses such as severe malnutrition and heart disease will be excluded from the study.

Treatment and study plan

RDT

Device

Study children attending RDT+ACT HCs with a febrile illness will be tested with an RDT to confirm malaria and treated with ACT only if they have a positive test for malaria parasite. However if there are signs suggestive of other co-morbidities they will be treated with appropriate medicines in addition to AS+AQ.

Clinical Judgement as basis for treatment of malaria with ACT

Other

Study children attending RDT+ACT HCs with a febrile illness will be tested with an RDT to confirm malaria and treated with ACT only if they have a positive test for malaria parasite. However if there are signs suggestive of other co-morbidities they will be treated with appropriate medicines in addition to AS+AQ.

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of malaria (fever + any level of parasite density) in < 48 month-old children (Stage 2, Component A)

    Time frame: Three years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of severe anaemia (Hb <8 g/dl) in < 48 month old children

    Time frame: Three years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana

Other

Collaborators

  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Restricting the Use of AS-AQ Combination Therapy to Malaria Cases Confirmed by a Dipstick Test: A Cluster Randomised Control Trial

Acronym: RDT-ACT

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jan 30, 2009
Registry last updated
Dec 21, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.