Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02931487

Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability

Selective biases in attention can be modified by a simple computerized technique: The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM) pioneered by MacLeod et al. Cognitive biases may be one reason depression recurs, and altering these biases should reduce risk of recurrence. Recently, evidence has supported this hypothesis . The mechanisms by which ABM works are not well understood. More research is needed to explore how altering an implicit attentional bias can lead to changes in subjective mood. One possible explanation is that positive attentional biases are an important component of explicit methods of emotion regulation. The ability to effectively regulate one's emotions is a fundamental component of mental health and this ability is impaired in depression. It has also been shown that recovered depressed people spontaneously show a more dysfunctional pattern of emotion regulation as compared to never depressed controls. Supporting this, growing evidence implicates dysregulation of a medial/orbitofrontal circuit in mood disorders. This circuit includes the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, the ventral striatum, the ventral pallidum and medial thalamus. Components of this circuit are reciprocally connected with the amygdala, which is implicated in emotional processing in the healthy brain and dysregulated in depression. Negative emotion processing biases depend on both enhanced "bottom-up" responses to emotionally salient stimuli and reduces "top-down" cognitive control mechanisms, required to suppress responses to emotionally salient but task irrelevant information. Cognitive reappraisal and distancing are common strategies to down- or upregulate emotional responses. Reappraisal is an emotion regulation strategy that involves reinterpretation and changing the way one thinks about an event or stimulus with the goal of changing its affective impact. Distancing is a type of reappraisal that involves creating mental space between oneself and the emotional event in order to see things from a different, less self-focused perspective. It has been shown that distancing is a strategy that people can improve at over time compared to reinterpretation. The neural systems which support the explicit regulation of emotion have previously been characterized and include both lateral- and prefrontal cortex. This frontal activity is predicted to downregulate limbic circuitry involving the amygdala during passive viewing of emotional salient stimuli.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Oslo, Department of Psychology

Oslo, 0317, Norway

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently no-depressed subjects with a history of major depression.

Exclusion criteria

  • Current or past neurological illness, bipolar disorder, psychosis or drug addiction.

Treatment and study plan

Attentional Bias Modification

Behavioral

Computerized

Sham Comparator

Behavioral

Computerized

Primary outcomes

  1. BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions

    Time frame: Two weeks after after ABM-training

    Stronger fMRI BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions in ABMT compared to neutral AMB placebo condition.

Secondary outcomes

  1. BOLD response within the amygdala

    Time frame: Two weeks after ABM-training

    Lower ABM fMRI BOLD response within the amygdala in ABMT compared to neutral ABM placebo condition.

  2. DTI

    Time frame: Two weeks after ABM-training

    Increased neural integrity as measured by fractional anisotropy values in the uncinate fasciculi (UF) in the active AMBT compared to neutral ABM placebo condition.

  3. RSFC

    Time frame: Two weeks after ABM-training

    Increased integrity within the attentional networks at rest as measured by independent component analysis (ICA) in ABMT compared to neutral ABM training.

  4. 5-HTTLPR + A>G polymorphic variation divided by the triallelic functional "high expressive" versus "low expressive" genotype will moderate the impact from ABMT as measured by whole brain BOLD responses.

    Time frame: Two weeks after ABM-training

    The low expressive variant will be associated with more frontal BOLD activation and lower amygdala activation after ABMT

  5. BDNF

    Time frame: Two week after ABM-training

    Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) val66met polymorphic variation linked to Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) variation will differentiate between ABMT and neutral AMB placebo as measured by fMRI whole brain BOLD responses.

  6. Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI

    Time frame: Two weeks after ABM-training

    A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on fMRI BOLD signal compared to a neutral placebo condition.

  7. Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and morphompetry

    Time frame: Two weeks after ABM-training

    A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on structural MRI as measured by total grey matter volume compared to a neutral placebo condition.

  8. Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI and DTI

    Time frame: Two weeks after ABM-training

    A serotonergic cumulative Genetic score, including (5-HHTLPR, HTR1A 8rs6295) and HTR 2A (rs 6311) polymorphisms will moderate the effects of ABM on DTI MRI as measured by fractional anisotropy compared to a neutral placebo condition.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Oslo

Other

Collaborators

  • Oslo University Hospital
  • University of Oxford

Registry information

Official study title

Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability: An Experimental Study Applying an Attention Bias Modification Procedure

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 13, 2016
Registry last updated
Apr 30, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.