University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05322239
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly being applied to effectively treat mental illness, however efforts to quantify the effects of TMS on the network architecture of the brain have largely been limited in scope and tied to specific neurologic and psychiatric disorders. The objective of the current work is to build and validate a whole-brain, domain-general model of brain connectivity changes following TMS, based on physical models of the current distribution at the cortex. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This work is relevant to public health because it will provide direct evidence that brain connectivity changes following neuromodulatory TMS vary as a function of the current density at the cortex, which can be used to predict psychiatric symptom change following neuromodulatory TMS.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, and smoking cessation. Despite evidence that TMS improves symptoms by modulating brain connectivity, the few published studies that have measured brain connectivity before and after neuromodulatory TMS have been population-, dose-, and pattern-specific, with connectivity effects that are limited in scope to a handful a priori regions of interest. Accordingly, there is a critical need for generalized, comprehensive model that explains how functional brain connectivity changes at the whole-brain level following neuromodulatory TMS. Therefore, the objectives of this grant are to 1) develop a model using whole-brain estimates of the TMS-induced electric (e)-field to predict changes in resting state functional connectivity following neuromodulatory TMS, and 2) validate this model in a large cohort of healthy volunteers receiving multiple doses of either intermittent or continuous theta burst stimulation (iTBS and cTBS, respectively). Our central hypothesis is that changes in functional connectivity will vary systematically with the current density at the cortex, operationally defined using e-field modelling. Investigators have pilot data suggesting that the variability in pre-post rsFC changes following TMS can be predicted using estimates of the current density at the cortex with a medium to large effect size. Our approach will be to measure rsFC in healthy volunteers before and after each of 3 doses (5 sessions/dose; 600 pulses/session) of iTBS or cTBS. Stimulation will be delivered to the left dlPFC, and targeting will be individualized based on fMRI data collected during the Sternberg working memory paradigm. Our primary outcome measure will be the percent of variability in pre-post rsFC accounted for by our model. Our rationale for this approach is that by collecting resting state data pre and post these doses of iTBS and cTBS, investigators will be able to quantify the effect of pattern (i.e. cTBS vs. iTBS) and dose (i.e. number of pulses) on functional connectivity changes. This work is innovative because it uses a novel application of e-field modelling to predict changes in rsFC data following TMS administration. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This work is relevant to public health because it will provide direct evidence that functional connectivity changes following neuromodulatory TMS vary as a function of the current density at the cortex. The empirical support for this model gained from this current work will set the stage for the use of this model for individualized targeting in subsequent clinical trials. Importantly, because of the domain-general nature of this approach its application is not limited to any specific disorder. Likewise, because our approach is not tied to any specific functional connectivity feature, it can be applied to regions outside those currently under investigation, which could facilitate target discovery in understudied disorders.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
iTBS parameters. A series of 20, 10 s trains will be presented over the course of the ~3.5 min session. Each train will consist of 2 s of stimulation with an 8 s ITI. During the 2 s of stimulation, 10, 50 Hz bursts will be repeated at intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz).
cTBS parameters. A single 600 pulse cTBS train will be delivered during each stimulation session. The train will consist of 50 Hz bursts, repeated at intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz) for 40 sec.
Time frame: 24 hours
Investigators will measure resting state functional connectivity 24 hours after first dose of continuous or intermittent theta burst stimulation.
Time frame: 24 hours
Investigators will measure resting state functional connectivity 24 hours after second dose of continuous or intermittent theta burst stimulation.
Time frame: 24 hours
Investigators will measure resting state functional connectivity 24 hours after third dose of continuous or intermittent theta burst stimulation.
Time frame: 24 hours
Investigators will measure reaction time during the Sternberg Working memory paradigm 24 hours after first dose of continuous or intermittent theta burst stimulation.
Time frame: 24 hours
Investigators will measure reaction time during the Sternberg Working memory paradigm 24 hours after second dose of continuous or intermittent theta burst stimulation.
Time frame: 24 hours
Investigators will measure reaction time during the Sternberg Working memory paradigm 24 hours after third dose of continuous or intermittent theta burst stimulation.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Nicholas Balderston, PhD
Other
Novel Electric-field Modelling Approach to Quantify Changes in Resting State Functional Connectivity Following Theta Burst Stimulation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07717827
Brain (Nervous System) Cancers, Brain Connectivity
Palermo, PA, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07091500
Body Weight, Brain Connectivity
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06910293
Brain Connectivity, Brain Function
Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
View Trial DetailsNCT06573658
Brain Connectivity, Brain Structure
Hong Kong
View Trial Details