Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06866132

Response to an Investigational Device in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome

This study assesses the tolerability, safety, and impact of an investigational medical device on restless legs syndrome symptoms.

The IRB has established that the investigational device is non-significant risk.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Noctrix Health Headquarters

Pleasanton, California, 94566, United States

About this study

In this 12-week study, participants complete a 2-week baseline (no intervention) followed by 8-weeks of investigational medical device intervention (weeks 3-10) followed by 2-weeks with no intervention (weeks 11-12).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • - Subject has signed a valid, IRB-approved informed consent form, can understand the requirements of the study and instructions for device usage, and can converse in English
  • - Subject has received a medical diagnosis of primary restless legs syndrome.
  • - Subject agrees to not change dosage or schedule of any medications that are known to impact RLS symptoms during the study, including RLS medications, antidepressants, sleep medications, or sedative antihistamines.
  • - Subject has moderate-severe RLS symptoms as defined by a score of 15 or greater points on IRLS (International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale) over the week prior to study entry.
  • - Subject reports that RLS symptoms caused awakenings or interfered with falling back asleep at least 3 nights per week during the month prior to study entry,
  • - Subject reports that RLS symptoms are most significant in lower legs and/or feet.

Exclusion criteria

  • - The subject has an active medical device implant anywhere in the body (including but not limited to pacemakers, spinal cord stimulators, deep brain stimulators).
  • - The subject has a metal implant at the site of the study device electrode application (not including knee replacements).
  • - The subject has been diagnosed with epilepsy or other seizure disorder.
  • - The subject has a moderate or severe cognitive disorder or mental illness that would affect his or her ability to participate in the study.
  • - The subject has a known allergy to device materials, electrode gel, polyurethane foam, or lycra (or a severe previous reaction to medical adhesives or bandages).
  • - Subject has any of the following at or near the location of device application: Acute injury, Cellulitis, Open sores
  • - The subject is unable or unwilling to comply with study requirements.
  • - The subject has a medical condition not listed above that may put them at risk.
  • - Subject has prior experience with any neurostimulation devices developed by the study sponsor
  • - Subject has a primary sleep disorder other than RLS that significantly interferes with sleep at the present time (e.g. obstructive sleep apnea stably controlled via CPAP would not be an exclusion).
  • - On nights with no RLS symptoms (if any), subject reports typical sleep onset latency of >60min.
  • - Subject has severe peripheral neuropathy affecting the lower legs and/or subject has neuropathy and is unable to clearly distinguish between symptoms of neuropathy and symptoms of RLS.
  • - Subject reports that bedtime is typically outside of 9pm-3am or reports that bedtime regularly varies by more than 4 hours, such as due to shift work.
  • - During initial device set-up, device does not properly fit the subject or calibrated intensity settings are outside of operational range

Treatment and study plan

Investigational Noninvasive Neuromodulation Device

Device

The investigational noninvasive neuromodulation device will be setup by the patient at bedtime and will be used every night. The IRB has established that the investigational device is non-significant risk.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in IRLS Rating Scale Score

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLS) Rating Scale Score is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe. The mean change is assessed from study entry to Week 10.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean change in the number of nights with RLS per week

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    This outcome measures the change in subject-reported number of nights with RLS, which ranges from 0 to 7 for each time point assessed. The mean change is assessed from study entry to Week 10. A greater decrease represents a better outcome.

  2. Mean Change in MOS-II

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index II (MOS-II) score is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. The mean change is assessed from study entry to Week 10.

  3. Mean Change in MOS-I

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index II (MOS-II) score is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. The mean change is assessed from study entry to Week 10.

  4. Mean PGI-I score

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    The Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) score assesses the patient's perception of their condition's improvement from study entry, with scores ranging from: Very Much Improved (1), Much Improved (2), Minimally Improved (3), No Change (4), Minimally Worse (5), Much Worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). The mean is assessed at Week 10 relative to study entry.

  5. Percent of Patients Reporting Much Improved or Very Much Improved

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    The Responder Rate is the percentage of subjects with a Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) rating of Much Improved or Very Much Improved relative to study entry. The scores for the Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) are: Very Much Improved (1), Much Improved (2), Minimally Improved (3), No Change (4), Minimally Worse (5), Much Worse (6), Very Much Worse (7).

    This endpoint assesses the responder rate at Week 10.

  6. Mean Change in Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Mean change in the total number of periodic limb movements (PLMs) per hour of sleep from Weeks 1-2 to Weeks 9-10. A greater decrease in PLMs per hour corresponds to a better outcome.

  7. Mean Change in Sleep Efficiency Percentage

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Sleep efficiency (SE) is the percentage of the time a person spends asleep relative to the total time dedicated to sleep. A better outcome corresponds to a percentage closer to 100%. This endpoint measures the mean change from Weeks 1-2 to Weeks 9-10.

  8. Mean Change in Minutes Awake after Sleep Onset (WASO)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Minutes Awake after Sleep Onset (WASO) refer to the total number of minutes awake after first going to sleep and before waking up for the next day in the morning. Lower WASO corresponds to a better outcome.

    This endpoint measures the mean change from Weeks 1-2 to Weeks 9-10.

  9. Mean Change in Total Sleep Time (TST)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Total sleep times (TST) refers to the total minutes of sleep starting at bedtime until waking up in the next morning. Higher TST corresponds to a better outcome.

    This endpoint measures the mean change from Weeks 1-2 to Weeks 9-10.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Noctrix Health, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Form, Fit and Function Feasibility Study

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 10, 2025
Registry last updated
Aug 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.