Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Investigational Vaccine in Infants Aged 6 and 7 Months Likely to be Unexposed to RSV

Assessed solicited local AEs are erythema, pain and swelling at injection site. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade. Any redness and swelling = adverse event reported with a surface diameter greater than 0 millimeters. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, active comparators pooled and placebo groups separately to compare the expected adverse events observed from routine pediatric vaccines (active comparators) with the investigational RSV vaccine. Placebo was not pooled with active comparators as no significant difference was expected in AEs when placebo was pooled with active comparators. As pre-specified in the protocol, the choice of active comparator or placebo was based on each participating country's standard of care.

Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, active comparators pooled and placebo groups separately to compare the expected adverse events observed from routine pediatric vaccines (active comparators) with the investigational RSV vaccine. Placebo was not pooled with active comparators as no significant difference was expected in AEs when placebo was pooled with active comparators. As pre-specified in the protocol, the choice of active comparator or placebo was based on each participating country's standard of care.

Assessed solicited general adverse events are drowsiness, fever [defined as temperature equal to or above (>=) 38.degrees Celsius (C)/100.4 Fahrenheit (F) by any route], irritability/fussiness and loss of appetite. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade or relation to study vaccination. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, each of the active comparators and placebo groups separately as the study interest was to investigate solicited AEs during the follow-up period of RSV vaccine administration, compared to placebo and routine pediatric vaccines, especially comparing to the rates of Bexsero-related fever. As pre-specified in the protocol, the choice of active comparator or placebo was based on each participating country's standard of care.

Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, each of the active comparators and placebo groups separately as the study interest was to investigate solicited AEs during the follow-up period of RSV vaccine administration, compared to placebo and routine pediatric vaccines, especially comparing to the rates of Bexsero-related fever. As pre-specified in the protocol, the choice of active comparator or placebo was based on each participating country's standard of care.

An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Unsolicited AEs are reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to study vaccination. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Assessed serious adverse events (SAEs) include medical occurrences that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or resulted in disability/incapacity. Any = occurrence of SAE regardless of intensity grade or relation to study vaccination. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of theindividual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Any episode of spontaneous or excessive bleeding if occurring after vaccination was to be fully investigated with a full range of hematological tests to identify the underlying cause and reported as an AE of special interest. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

According to standardized case definitions,RSV-RTI is a subject having runny nose/blocked nose/ cough & confirmed RSV infection.RSV-LRTI is a subject having history of cough/ difficulty breathing[based on history reported by parents] & blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) lower than(<)95 percent (%)/ respiratory rate (RR) increase & confirmed RSV infection Severe RSV-LRTI-Cases meeting RSV-LRTI case definition & an SpO2<93 %/lower chest wall in-drawing. Very severe RSV-LRTI-Cases meeting RSV-LRTI case definition & an SpO2<90%/inability to feed/failure to respond/unconscious.Analysis of this outcome measure was reported for RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled & comparator_placebo pooled groups as data was collected based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the groups.Per the pre-specified analysis plan,data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups

Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the 15 groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Subjects experiencing an LRTI associated with RSV infection were reported as AE of special interest. To identify RSV-LRTI for the purpose of AE of specific interest, the diagnosis was based on the investigators' clinical judgment taking into account the clinical history, the examination, relevant medical investigations and locally-available diagnostic test for RSV. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Very severe RSV LRTI are cases meeting the case definition of RSV-LRTI AND a SpO2 <90%, OR inability to feed, OR failure to respond/unconscious. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Humoral response to the investigational RSV vaccine was measured in terms of anti-RSV-A neutralizing antibody titers and expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs) in Estimated Dilution 60 (ED60) titers. Analysis of this outcome measure were reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.

Humoral response to the investigational RSV vaccine was measured in terms of anti-RSV-F antibody concentrations and expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) units per milliliter (EU/mL). Analysis of this outcome measure was reported for the RSV1D pooled, RSV2D pooled, and comparator_placebo pooled groups as data collection was based on different standard of care provided at participating countries rather than randomization to each of the individual groups. According to the pre-specified analysis plan, data collected for participant flow, baseline characteristics and adverse events reporting were not analyzed for the individual groups.