Progressive resistance training
BehavioralThe RT exercise regime will focus on lower extremity exercises (60-90% of 1 repetition maximum) as well as incorporating functional exercises.
NCT Number: NCT06374108
The goal of the present study is to investigate effects of progressive resistance training on central nervous system functioning (corticospinal excitability (CSE)) and walking capacity in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). A total of 54 pwMS will be enrolled and randomized into 1 of 3 groups: high dose resistant training (RT), low dose RT, and waitlist control.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Department of Public Health, Aarhus, Central Jutland, Denmark
Neurodegeneration is a hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS), affecting both structure and function of the central nervous system (CNS). Neurodegeneration is the main driver of disability progression in MS, evidenced by studies showing deleterious structural and functional CNS changes, ultimately reducing quality of life. Consequently, the interaction between the nervous system and muscular system undergoes deleterious changes causing reduced neuromuscular function (i.e., ability to develop muscle strength and power) and physical function.
The functional CNS changes have been evidenced by using the non invasive brain stimulation technique Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, showing decreased corticospinal excitability alongside increased central motor conduction time. Moreover, functional peripheral nervous system (PNS) changes have been evidenced by nerve conduction methods, revealing decreased amplitude of compound muscle action potential and increased latency of nerve signaling. In an ongoing exploratory study (unpublished), the investigators have observed that functional CNS and PNS outcomes deteriorate with disability progression from healthy to mildly to moderately disabled people with MS (PwMS).
Exercise is beneficial from both an individual and a societal perspective, and has proven to be both safe and without any noticeable side effects in PwMS. Resistance training (RT) appears particularly effective in improving neuromuscular function (mainly muscle strength) and physical function (especially walking capacity). Whilst RT and other exercise modalities may elicit positive effects on CNS structure in PwMS, it seems to require a long-term (≥ 6 months) exposure. In contrast, CNS (and potentially PNS) function may adapt much more rapidly, despite a scarcity of studies (and with heterogeneous findings) involving PwMS. Interestingly, an exploratory exercise study (non-controlled, low sample size, 10 weeks treadmill walking intervention) assessed corticospinal excitability in PwMS, and observed substantial improvements after the intervention. Apart from this study, a major knowledge gap exists in terms of elucidating the potential beneficial effects of exercise (RT in particular) on CNS (and PNS) function. Based on evidence from healthy young individuals, substantial improvements in corticospinal excitability have been shown following 2-12 weeks of RT, supporting that RT-induced improvements in corticospinal excitability can also be seen in PwMS. Lastly, as existing exercise guidelines for PwMS fails to refer to evidence on dose-response to exercise, and a recent systematic review on exercise studies found no dose-response studies in PwMS (n=202), this aspect is also of great clinical relevance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The RT exercise regime will focus on lower extremity exercises (60-90% of 1 repetition maximum) as well as incorporating functional exercises.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Cortical excitability measured as amplitude percentage ratio between MEP (resting) and Mmax (Cmap of TA). Unit (intended): %
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) is the maximal force-generating capacity (plantar flexion and dorsal flexion). Unit (intended): N
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Assessed by Interpolated Twitch Technique (ITT) (dorsal flexion). Unit (intended): %
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
EMG amplitude during MVC (plantar flexion and dorsal flexion). Unit (intended): μV
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
A quantitative measure of the ability to control muscle tonus (dorsal flexion). Unit (intended): root-mean-square (RMS) error (Coefficient of Variation (CV))
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
This is defined as the speed at which the contractile elements of the muscle can develop force (plantar flexion and dorsal flexion). Unit (intended): N/s
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Measure of muscle thickness of the tibialis anterior. Unit (intended): mm
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
The intensity necessary to produce a motor-evoked potential (MEP) that exceeds a defined peak-to-peak amplitude (50 μV) 50% of the time in a finite number of trials. Unit (intended): % Maximum stimulator output (MSO)
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
The intensity necessary to produce a motor-evoked potential (MEP) that exceeds a defined peak-to-peak amplitude (50 μV) 50% of the time in a finite number of trials during voluntary activation (20% of MVC). Unit (intended): % Maximum stimulator output (MSO)
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
The transmission time from stimulating the cortex to the start of the evoked potential in the EMG of the target muscle. Unit (intended): ms
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
The transmission time from stimulating the cortex to the start of the evoked potential in the EMG of the target muscle. Unit (intended): ms
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Peak-to-peak of averaged MEP (20 stimulations of 120% rMT). Unit (intended): mV
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Peak-to-peak of averaged MEP (20 stimulations of 120% rMT). Unit (intended): mV
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
SICI measures cortical inhibition and is a TMS protocol in which two stimuli are delivered with an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 2.5 ms. Unit (intended): the relative amplitude difference of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (%).
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
ICF measures cortical facilitation and is a TMS protocol in which two stimuli are delivered with an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 10 ms. Unit (intended): the relative amplitude reduction of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (%).
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
The temporary interruption of electromyographic signal from a muscle following a motor-evoked potential (MEP) triggered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Unit (intended): ms
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
The time it takes for the fastest action potentials to travel from the site of cortical stimulation to the spinal motoneuron. It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT) from the MEP latency or by the F-wave method. Unit (intended): ms
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Synchronization between brain activity (EEG) and muscle activity (EMG) over a specific frequency range. Unit (intended): ranging from 0 to 1, where 0 is no coherence and 1 is perfect coherence.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Objective test that measures walking speed. Unit (intended): seconds.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Objective test that measures walking endurance. Unit (intended): meters.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Objective test that measures walking coordination and balance. Unit (intended): seconds.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Objective test that measures functional lower limb muscle strength and power. Unit (intended): seconds.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Objective test that measures functional lower limb muscle strength and power. Unit (intended): seconds.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
A patient-reported measure of disability. Unit (intended): score (0-8; 0 is normal).
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Questionnaire that measures quality of life. Unit (intended): score (0-100; 0 is better).
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Questionnaire that measures the impact fatigue has on daily life. Unit (intended): score (0-84; 0 is better)
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Questionnaire that measures the impact MS has on daily life. Unit (intended): score (29-145; 29 is better)
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Questionnaire that measures concerns about falling. Unit (intended): score (16-64; 16 is better)
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Questionnaire that measures enjoyment for physical activity. Unit (intended): score (8-56; Higher score reflect greater level of enjoyment)
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Questionnaire that measures pain severity and pain interference. Unit (intended): No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items can be used as measures of pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items can be used as a measure of pain interference.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Questionnaire (patient-reported outcome) assessing patient-reported participation in physical activities. Unit (intended): Score range is continuous (0-xx). Higher is better.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 10 weeks
Method used to measures and analyze movement and acceleration in three dimensions of a person (physical activity). Unit (intended): g (m/s^2)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Aarhus
Other
Effects of Supervised Progressive Resistance Training on Central Nervous System Functioning (Corticospinal Excitability) and Walking Capacity in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis
Acronym: NEXIMS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03816345
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07736482
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Afyonkarahisar, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07738978
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07738120
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Pontevedra, Spain
View Trial Details