Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
NCT Number: NCT06354634
The purpose of this research study is to test the effectiveness of two different crowns/caps on teeth for restoration of primary molar teeth. The two different materials of crowns are resin polymer and stainless steel crowns. These crowns are placed on the teeth to restore function and prevent further caries and infection.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 year–7 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
There is a lack of literary evidence for assessment of the properties of Bioflx crowns and their effect on clinical outcomes and parental satisfaction compared to traditionally available options including stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns. Hence, this study plans to assess the clinical performance and child and parental satisfaction of Bioflx compared to the "gold standard" stainless steel crowns in pediatric patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Resin polymer (NuSmile Bioflx)crown
Stainless steel crown
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months
The clinical outcomes will be measured and reported in the data table based on the number of participants scored on 3-point Likert scale (Ideal, Acceptable, or Not Acceptable) for the following parameters separately: Contour of crown, gingival health, staining of crown, surface roughness of crown, opposing tooth, color match of crown, marginal fit, marginal discoloration, recurrent caries.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months
The radiographic outcomes will be measured and reported in the data table based on the number of participants scored on either presence or absence (yes / no) of the findings for the following parameter separately: Widening of periodontal ligament space, furcation radiolucency, periapical pathology, alveolar crestal bone loss, internal root resorption and external root resorption.
Time frame: 3, 12, 24 and 36 months
The questionnaire is a Likert scale of 1-5. 1 equals very dissatisfied. 5 equals very satisfied. The higher the score, the better.
Time frame: 3, 12, 24 and 36 months
The questionnaire is a Likert scale of 1-5. 1 equals very dissatisfied. 5 equals very satisfied. The higher the score, the better.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
The questionnaire is a Likert scale of 1-5. 1 equals never. 5 equals very often. The lower the score, the better.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Other
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Resin Polymer (NuSmile BioFlx) Compared to Stainless Steel (3M ESPE) Crowns for Restoration of Primary Molar Teeth: a Split Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06348953
Caries; Dentin, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06354647
Dental Caries, Stomatognathic Diseases
Richmond, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04756557
Dental Caries, Dentin, Carious
Poznan, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07186673
Dental Caries, Permanent First Molar Caries
Latakia, Syria
View Trial Details