Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06619327

Resilient Together for Dementia (RT-D)

This study will evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the novel Resilient Together for Dementia (RT-D) intervention for couples following dementia diagnoses. The primary target is emotional distress, and the program aims to prevent chronic distress in at-risk couples.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Brain Injury Research Center at Mount Sinai

New York, 10029, United States

Location status: Recruiting

About this study

Both persons living with dementia and their spousal care-partners experience high levels of clinically elevated emotional distress, which can become chronic without treatment and negatively impact the health, quality of life, communication, and care-planning of both partners. A tailored dyadic intervention, such as the proposed Resilient Together for Dementia, delivered over live video to this at risk population has the potential to prevent chronic emotional distress and preserve quality of life for PWDs and their loved ones.

A pilot feasibility randomized control trial (RCT; Aim 3; NIA Stage 1B; N=50 dyads) will be conducted of the refined RT-D versus a minimally enhanced educational control (MEUC, educational pamphlet). Primary outcomes will be feasibility, credibility, and acceptability markers to inform a hybrid efficacy effectiveness R01 (year 4) of RT-D vs. MEUC (NIA Stage II). In this subsequent R01, the researcher will examine RT-D's impact on emotional distress and quality of life outcomes and test mechanisms of change (individual and interpersonal resiliency skills) through mediation and moderation. The researcher will revise the approach if feasibility benchmarks are not met.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recent (~3 month) chart documented ADRD diagnosis,
  • ADRD symptom onset after age 65
  • Cognitive assessment scores and symptoms consistent with early stage dementia, as determined by the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale scores of .5 or 1.0
  • Cognitive awareness of their problems (as determined by the treating neurologist), and ability to understand study and research protocol, as determined by a standardized teach-back method assessment

Additional inclusion criteria for dyads are:

  • English speaking adults (18 years or older)
  • Dyad lives together
  • At least one partner endorses clinically significant emotional distress during screening (>7 on Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale subscales or <5 on the Geriatric Depression Scale)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient is deemed inappropriate by the neurology team
  • Either partner has a co-occurring terminal illness
  • Patient was diagnosed with forms of dementia with clinical profiles that would preclude participation (e.g., Frontotemporal Dementia- behavioral variant), as determined by treatment team.

Treatment and study plan

Resilient Together for Dementia

Behavioral

RT-D has been developed based on feedback from couples and dementia clinicians as well as prior successful dyadic interventions. RT-D was developed based on the Recovering Together (RT) dyadic intervention for acute neurological illnesses and is being adapted to address the needs of couples navigating new dementia diagnoses.

Other names: RT-D

MEUC

Behavioral

The MEUC condition was also developed based on the comparison trial in the Recovering Together dyadic intervention, and was adapted based on feedback from prior studies. The program is self-guided and provides educational information similar to the RT-D condition, but with no skills practice or weekly sessions with a therapist.

Other names: Minimally enhanced usual care

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants screened

    Time frame: After each dyad completion, throughout study of 6-8 weeks

    Feasibility of recruitment - recruitment will be monitored by screening clinic visits for potentially eligible individuals and review recruitment progress in weekly meetings to promote completion within the study time frame. The research team will measure with the proportion of participants screened.

  2. Proportion of participants who consent or not consent to participate

    Time frame: After each dyad completion, throughout study of 6-8 weeks

    Feasibility of consent - by keeping a record of all individuals who complete screening that consent, refuse to consent, and the reasons for refusal will be monitored and will review progress in weekly team meetings. The research team will measure with the proportion of participants who consent or not consent to participate

  3. Proportion of sessions participants attend

    Time frame: After each dyad completion, throughout study of 6-8 weeks

    The number of sessions that enrolled dyads attend as well as missed sessions, treatment dropouts, and reasons for nonattendance will be monitored and will review progress in weekly meetings. The research team will measure with the proportion of sessions participants attend.

  4. Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)

    Time frame: After each dyad completion, throughout study of 6-8 weeks

    A scale measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating higher treatment expectancy

  5. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Time frame: After each dyad completion, throughout study of 6-8 weeks

    A 3-item questionnaire assessing participants' satisfaction with participation in the study. Full scale from 0-12, with higher score indicating greater satisfaction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Time frame: Baseline to posttest (6-8 weeks)

    A 14-items scale with responses scored from 0-3, scores for each subscale from 0 (normal) to 21 (severe symptoms). Full scale score is 0 to 42, with higher score indicating more emotional distress.

  2. Geriatric Depression Scale

    Time frame: Baseline to posttest (6-8 weeks)

    A 15-item scale with yes/no responses, total scores range from 0 to 15. Scores of 0-4 are considered normal, 5-8 indicate mild depression, 9-11 suggest moderate depression, and 12-15 indicate severe depression. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

  3. Perceived Stress Scale

    Time frame: Baseline to posttest (6-8 weeks)

    A 10-item questionnaire, each item scored 0 (never) to 4 (very often), full scale from 0-40, with higher score indicating higher perceived stress.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sarah M. Bannon, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

212-241-0787

Sydney M, McCage

CONTACT

[email protected]

212-241-6866

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Official study title

Resilient Together for Dementia: A Live Video Resiliency Dyadic Intervention for Persons With Dementia and Their Care-partners Early After Diagnosis

Acronym: RT-D

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.