Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus N, Denmark
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06553235
The goal of the study is to investigate whether treating insomnia using app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) can improve cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors compared to an active control group (sleep hygiene education). The study will also explore if CBT-I is associated with changes in the brain and in inflammation. The investigators will recruit approximately 84 participants with insomnia and cognitive impairment who have completed breast cancer treatment within 1-5 years.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus N, Denmark
Location status: Recruiting
The study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of app-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) on cognitive function and insomnia to an active control group (sleep hygiene). Participants will be 84 breast cancer survivors who have completed primary treatment within 1-5 years and experience insomnia and cognitive impairment. After baseline assessment, participants will be randomized to either app-based CBT-I or sleep hygiene (active control). Both groups will undergo post-treatment assessments and 6-months follow-up assessments. The primary outcomes will be cognitive impairment assessed with the Conners Continuous Performance Test (CCPT) and insomnia assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). To explore potential neurobiological and inflammatory mechanisms, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and inflammatory markers will be secondary outcomes. To provide a broader insight into cognitive function, participants will undergo further neuropsychological assessment with various standardized neuropsychological tests.
The study has the following aims and hypotheses:
PRIMARY AIM: To investigate whether an app-based CBT-I is associated with improved sleep and cognitive function in BC survivors screened for insomnia and CI when compared with an active control group. PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS: Compared with an active control group, CBT-I will be associated with a statistically significantly greater reduction in insomnia severity using the ISI and improvement of sustained attention and executive function assessed objectively using the CCPT. Effects on secondary sleep outcomes will also be tested. Exploratory hypothesis: Improvements in sustained attention and executive function will be mediated by improved insomnia severity and sleep outcomes.
SECONDARY AIM 1: To investigate whether CBT-I is associated with altered structural brain outcomes when compared with an active control group. HYPOTHESIS: Compared with an active control group, CBT-I will be associated with changes in brain gray and white matter properties, structural network topology, as well as glymphatic function as operationalized with the diffusion tensor image along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) approach.
SECONDARY AIM 2: To explore whether CBT-I is associated with changes in inflammatory immune function (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ) when compared with an active control group. HYPOTHESIS: Compared with an active control group, CBT-I will be associated with a statistically significantly greater reduction in inflammatory markers. Improvements in sustained attention and executive function will be mediated by changes in inflammatory markers.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CBT-I is a multi-component intervention consisting of sleep restriction, stimulus control therapy, relaxation therapy, cognitive therapy, and sleep hygiene education
Other names: CBT-I
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Conners continuous performance test is a computerized test. It measures a combination of vigilance, sustained attention, and the inhibition component of executive function.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The ISI measures the severity of insomnia symptoms and the associated impact on daytime functioning and distress. The questionnaire consists of 7 questions the sum of which makes up a total score. The ISI has a range of 0-28, with higher scores indicate worse insomnia severity.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in vigilance will be measured with the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT).
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in processing speed will be measured using the Trail Making Test A with the outcome measured as time in seconds.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in processing speed will be measured with the WAIS-IV Digit Symbol Coding subtest. Scores range from 0 to 135, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in attention will be measured using the Digit Span Forwards subtest of the WAIS-IV. Scores range from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 16 points, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Changes in working memory will be measured using the WAIS-IV Digit Span Backwards and Ranking. Both have scores range from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 16 points, with higher scores indicating better out-comes.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in attention will be measured with the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, with scores from 0-60 with higher scores indicating better attention.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) assesses verbal learning and memory through immediate recall, delayed recall, and delayed recognition tasks. Part 1 has a scoring range from 0 to 36, where higher scores represent better outcomes. Part 2 has a scoring range from 0 to 12, with higher scores also indicating better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in learning and visual memory will be assessed using the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R).
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in verbal fluency will be evaluated using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), assessing both letter and animal categories. Participants will be instructed to generate as many words as possible within a specified time limit for each category. A higher number of words produced indicates a better outcome in verbal fluency for both letter and animal categories.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in executive function will be measured using the Trail Making Test B with the outcome measured as time in seconds.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The Stroop Color and Word Test will be used to measure cognitive processing speed, selective attention, and executive function.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0)
Pre-morbid intelligence will be measured using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) - Information subtest. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Glymphatic function will be assessed using diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS). This involves the calculation of an ALPS-index with higher indices indicating better glymphatic function.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in structural brain network organization based on MRI.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in brain gray matter as measured with T1-weighted MRI.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in white matter as measured with T1-weighted MRI.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in brain white matter as measured with diffusion-weighted MRI.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The concentration of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) will be extracted from blood samples.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The concentration of interleukin 1 beta (Il-1β) will be extracted from blood samples.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The concentration of interleukin 6 (IL-6)will be extracted from blood samples.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in the concentration of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) will be extracted from blood samples.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) will be extracted from blood samples.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9)
Objective sleep recorded with wrist actigraphy.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The FACT-Cog will be used as the measure of perceived cognitive impairment. It is a 37-item questionnaire with four subscales: perceived cognitive impairments, impact on quality of life, comments from others, and perceived cognitive abilities. Responses range from 0, ''never,'' to 4, ''several times a day,'' in the previous 7 days, and negatively worded items are reverse scored to create subscale scores.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in perceived cognitive functioning will be evaluated using The Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI). Scores on this inventory range from a minimum of 35 to a maximum of 210, where higher scores indicate better perceived cognitive functioning.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), with scores ranging from a minimum of 0, indicating no difficulty, to a maximum of 21, indicating severe difficulties in all areas related to sleep.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in health-related quality of life will be evaluated using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life questionnaire for cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-C30). All scales and single-item measures on this questionnaire range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a higher level of response in health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0)
The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire-reduced (MEQr) will be used to assess circadian rhythm preferences (chronotype). This 5-item questionnaire evaluates sleep-wake patterns, preferred activity times, and subjective alertness at different times of the day. Scores categorize individuals as morning types, evening types, or intermediate types, with higher scores indicating a preference for morningness and lower scores indicating a preference for eveningness.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in fatigue severity will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale, which ranges from 0 to 52. Items are reverse scored as needed, resulting in a scale where higher scores denote better functioning or less fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
Changes in depression and anxiety will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Scores on this scale range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression and anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) will be used to measure the perception of stress. This 10-item questionnaire assesses how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will be used to measure pain intensity. Participants will rate their pain on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-treatment (approximately week 9), 6-months follow-up (approximately week 33)
The pain interference subscale from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to measure how pain affects various aspects of daily life. This subscale consists of 7 items, each scored on a scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater interference of pain.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0)
The Short-Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. This questionnaire comprises 36 items that evaluate eight domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health (psychological distress and well-being). Scores from these domains are combined to yield two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life across the evaluated domains.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0)
The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) will be used to assess the severity of comorbid medical conditions. It consists of 19 medical conditions, each assigned a weighted score based on its impact on mortality. The total score is calculated by summing these weighted scores, with higher totals indicating a greater burden of comorbidities.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0)
Treatment expectancy and rationale credibility will be measured with the Expectancy/Credibility Questionnaire (CEQ). Scores for each question range from 1 to 9 or 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater treatment expectancy and credibility.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ali Amidi
CONTACT
Julie K. Thomadsen
CONTACT
Aarhus University Hospital
Other
Acronym: RESET-BRAIN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05780814
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06006299
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05887297
Adherence, Medication, Behavior
Glasgow, County (Optional), United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT04026048
Cancer, Cognition Disorders
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
View Trial Details