Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06278506

Resection or Ablation of Small Kidney Tumors

Ablative treatments are believed to have a lower rate of complications, shorter hospital stays, and fewer interventions with benign PAD compared to partial nephrectomies in small kidney cancer lesions. The purpose of the study is to compare complications, the frequency of residual tumors, impact on kidney function, differences in quality of life, and health economic factors in a randomised study. We will also compare the oncological outcomes, including survival and recurrence of kidney cancer.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, 14186, Sweden

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Anders Kjellman, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46736995258

Per-Olof Lundgren, MD, PhD

CONTACT

About this study

Kidney cancer represents approximately 2-3% of all cancer cases, with about 400,000 new cases and 175,000 deaths worldwide in 2018. In Sweden, about 1,200 new cases of kidney cancer are detected each year. The most common age for diagnosis is between 60 and 80 years, and it is more prevalent in men than in women. Many cases are incidentally discovered during imaging studies for unrelated issues. There has been an increase in incidentally detected tumors in Sweden, from 43% in 2005 to 69% in 2021. Nephron-sparing surgery, i.e., partial nephrectomy, is recommended for preserving kidney function in localized tumors.

Ablative treatments are recommended for patients with significant comorbidities, multiple tumors, a single kidney, or other situations where surgery is not considered suitable. Prior to treatment, a biopsy is usually performed to confirm the diagnosis. Studies show variations in oncological outcomes based on the subgroups of kidney cancer treated with ablative techniques. Ablative techniques seem to have a lower risk of complications compared to surgery concerning perioperative complications, bleeding, and maintaining kidney function for a longer time. However, there are no randomized controlled studies comparing ablative treatment with nephrectomy for T1a tumors in the kidney.

  • Hypothesis

Ablative treatment of small kidney tumors may result in shorter hospital stays with fewer complications compared to surgical resection.

There is no difference in long-term oncological outcomes between the methods.

  • Outcome Measures

The primary purpose of the study is to compare surgical complications, findings of remaining tumors after primary treatment, and the time patients are hospitalized after each procedure. Secondary outcomes include oncological outcomes in the short and long term, as well as functional factors

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 - 99 years
  • Patient suitable based on clinical status for both ablative treatment and surgery
  • Primary kidney tumor
  • Tumor size ≤ 3 cm
  • Clinical stage of the tumor T1a (no macroscopic vascular or extrarenal invasion)
  • Tumor location suitable for both ablative treatment and resection
  • Absence of radiological signs of metastasis
  • Biopsy with malignant pathological analysis (PAD)
  • ISUP grade I-III"

Exclusion criteria

  • Radiological signs of metastasis
  • Synchronous kidney tumors
  • ISUP grade IV or sarcomatoid growth in the biopsy
  • Other metastasized cancer in the last 5 years
  • Patient unable to make an informed decision to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

Ablation

Procedure

Microwave ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Cryo ablation

Other names: Microwave ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Cryo ablation

Surgery

Procedure

Partial or total nefrectomy

Other names: Partial nefrectomy, total nefrectomy

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with surgical complications according to Clavien-Dindo grade 2-5

    Time frame: First year after inclusion

    recorded through chart review at 30 and 90 days after treatment. Complications are summed up in case of retreatment before the 12-month follow-up.

  2. Radiological signs of a residual tumor at the 6-month follow-up

    Time frame: 6-month after inclusion

    Radiological sign of residual tumor at 6-month radiology

  3. Number of postoperative hospitalization days (LOS)

    Time frame: Sum of total after all interventions first year after the first intervention

    Number of postoperative hospitalization days (LOS), i.e., the time the patient has been hospitalized after the procedure until discharge. Hospitalization time is accumulated in case of retreatment within 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cancer-specific survival (CSS)

    Time frame: 2, 5 and 10 years after inclusion

    Cancer-specific survival (CSS) is the period from cancer diagnosis to death caused by this cancer diagnosis. CSS will be calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death.

  2. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: 2, 5 and 10 years after inclusion

    State of survival

  3. Change in eGFR one year after treatment

    Time frame: One year after inclusion

    The study aims to assess kidney function impairment one year after treatment. Blood tests for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) will be compared with preoperative values to monitor changes. Impaired function is defined as eGFR reduction by ≥20% one year after the procedure compared to measurements before treatment for kidney tumors (10).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anders Kjellman, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46736995258

Per-Olof Lundgren, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Resection or Ablative Treatment of Small Renal Tumors, a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Acronym: RESTART

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2037
First posted
Feb 26, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 26, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.