University of Colorado Denver
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
NCT Number: NCT02653092
Obesity plays an adverse role at every stage of conception and pregnancy and mounting evidence implicates relative hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and reduced menstrual cycle hormone secretion as likely contributors to the subfertility phenotype and possible contributors to complications of pregnancy and the developmental origin of adult diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This study will be the first comprehensive investigation to tie together the patterns of hyperinsulinemia, hyperlipidemia and inflammation, characteristic of obesity and obesity-caused relative hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism and its potential adverse reproductive outcomes. The investigators findings will be used to inform a subsequent clinical intervention to optimize reproductive outcomes for obese women and their offspring.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–38 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Before any of the well-known adverse effects in pregnancy2,3, obesity causes a relatively hypogonadotropic hypogonadal phenotype. Reduced LH, FSH, estradiol (E2) and progesterone secretion are well documented during the menstrual cycles of obese women compared to normal weight women (NWW).4,5. Decreased gonadotropin secretion associated with obesity is related to reduced pituitary sensitivity to GnRH6. This reduction in pituitary sensitivity suggests mediation by circulating factors such as cytokines, insulin, or other pro-inflammatory signals known to be elevated in obesity. We have recently discovered that the combination of hyperinsulinemia and circulating free fatty acids (FFAs), but neither agent alone, can acutely decrease gonadotropin secretion in NWW as well as men, establishing a direct causal linkage for the central hypothesis of this proposal: that chronic pituitary suppression partially mediates obesity related subfertility. Our working model is that the combination of excess, possibly pro-inflammatory (omega-6) circulating FFAs and insulin resistance associated with obesity, cause decreased pituitary sensitivity to GnRH, with a resulting relative sex steroid deficit that further exacerbates the obese phenotype. We have named this phenotype the reprometabolic syndrome. We propose to examine the interrelationships among obesity, reproductive dysfunction and metabolic dysfunction in a mechanistic fashion. We will induce the hypogonadotropic hypogonadal phenotype of obesity in NWW, who will be primed with a high-fat diet (HFD) designed to increase circulating FFAs and produce short-term insulin resistance and higher insulin levels.1,7-11 Before and after priming, we will test the additive effects of lipid excess, insulin, and inflammation on the reproductive and metabolic axes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Humulin
Other names: Free Fatty Acid
Other names: d-glucose
Other names: anticoagulant
Other names: gonadorelin acetate
Other names: HEC
Time frame: First 4 hours of the frequent blood sampling study before and after FFA administration
LH-Luteinizing Hormone Pulse Amplitude before and after administration of FFAs. This is a measure of the post supplementation frequent blood sampling session and the baseline session.
Time frame: 30 minutes
Primary outcome will be M, which represents the steady state amount of glucose metabolized at the set insulin infusion rate under euglycemic conditions, which is equal to the glucose infused when the participant is euglycemic during the second stage of the HEC49. The final 30 minutes of the clamp period will be considered steady state. Glucose concentrations will be determined with the glucose oxidase method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer 2; Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA), while ELISA methods will be used for insulin measurements (Alpco, Salem, NH).
Time frame: After the administration of GnRH at each FSS before and after acute and chronic FFA administration was assessed for up to 4 hours.
GnRH response will be compared between the non-intervention and intervention study as described above for gonadotropin pulsatility. The Investigator have used area under the curve methods to determine the LH response to exogenous GnRH and will utilize the same methodology as the investigator have done in the past.
Time frame: Before and after FFA adminstration
FSH parameters will be compared between the non-intervention and intervention studies for both aims as described above for gonadotropin pulsatility. The investigator will compare mean FSH, as pulsatility of FSH is less obvious than LH.
Time frame: 4 hours
The investigator will compare changes in gonadotropin pulse frequency (for LH, and if we can detect distinct FSH pulses, we will compare FSH as well), mean LH and FSH and kinetics of LH, and if possible, FSH, before and after the intervention, as previously reported
Time frame: Urinary assays will be measured for 4 menstrual cycles (approximately 4 months or 115 days)
Urinary hormone profiles will be assessed for the entire cycle before and two cycles after initiation of the HFD using previously described menstrual cycle parameters suitable for urinary hormone determinations. The LH peak will be determined for all cycles that demonstrate a Progesterone increment consistent with ovulation. Follicular and luteal phase lengths will be calculated, as will integrated follicular, luteal and whole cycle LH, FSH, E1c and Progesterone. The measurement is the change in value from baseline to 4 menstrual cycles (approximately 4 months) after baseline.
Time frame: 60 Minutes during HEC
Glucose will be measured by the CTRC laboratories before and after FFA administration..
Time frame: 30 Minutes during the HEC
RBC lipids will also be compared, as the investigator predict that the HFD will result in increased omega-6 rich FFAs and less omega-3 FFAs
Time frame: 5 months-before and after the interventation.
DEXA body composition will be measured before and after the intervention.
University of Colorado, Denver
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07403604
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06592261
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06558422
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07242534
Body Weight, Genital Diseases
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details