Caen University Hospital, department of psychiatry and explorations fonctionnelles neurologiques
Caen, France
NCT Number: NCT01466439
The repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a recent technique that has demonstrated its efficiency in both depression and schizophrenia. However if its efficiency has been recognized by the scientific community and the clinicians, its action on neurons and cerebral networks remains debated.
In the motor regions, the different rTMS studies generally use frequencies of stimulation of 1 to 40 Hz with differential effects; the low frequencies being associated with an inhibitory effect whereas highest frequencies have rather some facilitator effects as attested by the motor responses. What is valid for the motor system is not however necessarily applicable to other cerebral regions that have different neuronal organizations. If it is easy to observe these opposite effects of rTMS on the motor system (presence or absence of movements), these potential effects on more integrated cortex involved in high level functions have not been proved.
One of the possibilities to interpret the effects of the rTMS in no-motor cerebral regions would be to study the modifications of the EEG before and after rTMS and to see if a differential effect of the high and low frequencies of stimulation exists. Up to now, the studies having coupled these two techniques have observed modifications of the brain electric activity only during some seconds to minutes after rTMS, what appears in contrast with the clinical effects observed after a long delay (several days).
The contribution of our research resides in the use of the paradigm of suppression of P50 evoked potential component before and after rTMS tested with low and high frequencies of stimulation. This paradigm consists in two identical auditory stimuli presented at a very short interval (generally 500 milliseconds), the second sound generating a P50 wave of weaker amplitude than the first or being completely abolished in healthy subjects. However, this effect that has been well studied could result from an inhibitory action due to the gabaergic interneurons on the pyramidal neurons of the cortex. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that high frequency rTMS would have a facilitator effect on temporal lobe and so would induce no suppression of the P50 after-rTMS whereas low frequency rTMS would induce an inhibitory effect marked by a greater suppression of the P50.
Methods: 30 healthy subjects (of which 16 women) will be included after written consent. They will receive after randomization 2 sessions of rTMS in cross over at 1Hz and 20Hz at 30 days interval. An EEG and a P50 evoked potential will be done before and after rTMS. The site of stimulation will be determined by neuronavigation and will correspond to the maximal activation cluster generated by a language task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. The main judgment criterion is the S2/S1 ratio of the P50. The potential secondary effects will be evaluated (UKU adapted). The secondary criteria are the comparisons before and after rTMS of EEG spectrums in the alpha, beta and gamma bands.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Caen, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
frequency of stimulation of 20 Hz
frequency of stimulation of 1 Hz
Time frame: day of stimulation (day 1)
University Hospital, Caen
Other
Evaluation of Effect of Low and High-frequencies of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) by the Suppression of P50 Evoked Potential Component (rTMS-P50)
Acronym: rTMS-P50
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06038955
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Frederiksberg, Capital Region of Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT03451630
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02022462
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Santa Fe Springs, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04191876
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Glen Oaks, New York, United States
View Trial Details