Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05013866

Repair of Proximal Restoration Resin Bulk Fill. Clinical Trial

Bulk Fill" (RBF) composite resins (RC) has been on the market, with the main advantage of being applied in a single layer, faster and easier than a conventional RC. Repair of RC restorations is a validated treatment option in dentistry, which has been shown to increase the longevity of restorations by minimizing tooth damage such as complete replacement. Currently there are no clinical studies that support the actual performance of RBF repair

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Patricio Vildosola Grez

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7510583, Chile

About this study

Main objective: Compare the clinical performance with FDI of repairs proximal RC restorations between a conventional resin and a RBF in a period of 24 months. Hypothesis: There is not different clinical performance of proximal RC repairs done with RBF when compared to conventional RC repairs. Material and method: 80 volunteer patients will be randomly recruited to attend the clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Chile who have two proximal RC restorations with indication of repair according to the FDI system (n per group = 80). Each patient must accept and sign an informed consent. The repairs will be randomly divided into two groups on the same patient. Control Group: Conventional RC repair (Z350 XT). Experimental Group: RBF (Tetric Evoceram Bulk Fill) Repair. For the restorative technique, a three-step adhesive with acid-etched enamel-dentin will be used. It will be evaluated at 2 weeks (Baseline), at 6, 12, 18, 24 months by two blind and calibrated evaluators (Cohen Kappa> 0.8). The data will be analyzed with the SSPS 21.0 software and the Friedman, Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney tests will be applied with a significance level of 95%.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • > 18 years,
  • healthy
  • high cariogenic risk,
  • Vital molars and premolars,
  • Natural antagonist and proximal
  • Indication of repair in the proximal with depth> 2mm.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients has xerostomia either by taking medications known to produce xerostomia or those with radiation induced or Sjogren's syndrome patients -inability to perform hygiene
  • pregnant women
  • severe bruxism
  • Prosthesis
  • Not absolute isolation
  • Tooth fracture and / or restoration.

Treatment and study plan

Repair resin composite proximal

Procedure

Repair proximal composite resin restoration, removing the defective material and then restoring it with another composite resin

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Performance

    Time frame: Baseline

    Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI System, Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different property. Either restoration is clinically excellent (1), or good (2), or sufficient(3), or unsatisfactory(4), or clinically poor(5).

  2. Clinical Performance

    Time frame: 12 months

    Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI System, Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different property. Either restoration is clinically excellent (1), or good (2), or sufficient(3), or unsatisfactory(4), or clinically poor(5).

  3. Clinical Performance

    Time frame: 18 months

    Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI System, Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different property. Either restoration is clinically excellent (1), or good (2), or sufficient(3), or unsatisfactory(4), or clinically poor(5).

  4. Clinical Performance

    Time frame: 24 months

    Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI System, Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different property. Either restoration is clinically excellent (1), or good (2), or sufficient(3), or unsatisfactory(4), or clinically poor(5).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad Nacional Andres Bello

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Chile

Registry information

Official study title

Repair of Proximal Restoration With Resin Composite Bulk-Fill. Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 19, 2021
Registry last updated
Nov 4, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.