Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University
Aarhus, Danmark, 8200, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT04401306
The study is a prospective, randomized comparative study using a mixed methods design. The primary objective is to compare the effect of self-regulated simulation training (SRST) to instructor-regulated simulation training (IRST) in basic laparoscopic skills. The study population is first-year trainees in the specialties General Surgery, Urology and Obstetrics and Gynaecology within the postgraduate training region of northern Denmark. 46 first-year trainees will be randomized into two groups, one receiving SRST and one receiving IRST in basic laparoscopic skills.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus, Danmark, 8200, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants allocated to the SRST arm train basic laparoscopic skills at home. Participants train by themselves using a portable box training model (BT). Training is conducted and structured through an online application-based training platform. Training is instructed by online instructional videos and texts. The BT is connected to a laptop and the participants can submit videos of their training exercises for assessment through the online training platform.
Participants allocated to the IRST arm train basic laparoscopic skills at the simulation centre. Participants train on a portable box training model (BT). Training is structured through an online application-based training platform and facilitated and instructed by surgical specialists. The BT is connected to a laptop and the participants can submit videos of their training exercises for assessment through the online training platform.
Time frame: 0-7 months
Laparoscopic skills testing models (pre-test, post-test and retention-test). Scoring based on mean timing of 3 consecutively performed exercises (0-180 secs). Low time-scores are better than high time scores.
Time frame: 1-7 months
Laparoscopic knot tying testing model (post-test and retention test). Blinded outcome assessor. Score based on timing and quality of sutures and stitches (score range -2 to 18). High score is better than low score.
Time frame: 6-8 weeks
Accumulated raw training time (mins)
Time frame: 6-8 weeks
Number of training sessions
Time frame: 6-8 weeks
Pass/failure of proficiency-based training program (binary)
Time frame: 0-3 months
Qualitative data: Semi-structured interviews
University of Aarhus
Other
Remote Training in Laparoscopy: A Randomized Trial Comparing Home-based Self-regulated Training to Centralized Instructor-regulated Training.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06386601
Educational Problems, Surgery
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05251857
Educational Problems, Surgery
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03995719
Colorectal Disorders, Colostomy Complications
Seville, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03003091
Educational Problems, Surgery
View Trial Details