Hershey Medical Center ALS Clinic
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
NCT Number: NCT03214224
The specific objective of this study is to validate the practice of remote pulmonary function testing (rPFT) conducted in the home through the use of connected mobile health devices and the Penn State Hershey ALS Telemanagement program.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
The specific objective of this study is to validate the practice of remote pulmonary function testing (rPFT) conducted in the home through the use of connected mobile health devices and the Penn State Hershey ALS Telemanagement program. The central hypothesis is that guided home assessment of respiratory function is a valid method for detecting respiratory insufficiency leading to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) recommendation. This study has the potential to transform the current practice of conducting breathing assessments every three months, resulting in timelier detection of respiratory insufficiency, thereby staining quality of life and lengthening survival. This protocol has the potential to demonstrate telemanagement exceeding the standards of ALS care.
This is a self-controlled study which will enroll 40 patients from the ALS clinic. On the day of their clinical visit, study participants will perform both a standard PFT as well as a simulated rPFT, both generating three valid repetitions of forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) procedures. The simulated rPFT will mimic the practice of home telemonitoring by having patients be instructed by a respiratory therapist over the telemanagement portal while in a research room within the ALS clinic. The primary hypothesis is that there is no difference in the results of PFT and rPFT for respiratory assessment of FVC and MIP.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients:
Caregivers:
Respiratory Therapist
Part 2 imposes additional inclusion criteria for patients only.
Patients:
Exclusion criteria
Patients:
Caregivers: None
Respiratory Therapists: None
Telemedicine delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Standard clinical delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Time frame: One administration - 10 minutes
Respiratory therapist will administer three valid maneuvers of forced vital capacity (FVC) The best FVC value is the outcome.
Time frame: One administration - 10 minutes
Respiratory therapist will administer three valid maneuvers of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The best MIP value is the outcome.
Time frame: One administration - 10 minutes
Respiratory therapist will use the telehealth interface to guide the patient and caregiver to self-administer three valid FVC maneuvers. The best FVC value is the outcome.
Time frame: One administration - 10 minutes
Respiratory therapist will use the telehealth interface to guide the patient and caregiver to self-administer three valid MIP maneuvers. The best MIP value is the outcome.
Time frame: 10 minute survey administered following completion of standard and remote PFT of Part 1
Survey responses from the patient/caregiver pair. Likert-type scales are used to generate subscores pertaining to: General Acceptability, Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability, and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability.
Subscales (evaluated separately):
General Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)] Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best) Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)]
Time frame: 10 minute survey administered following completion of standard and remote PFT of Part 1
Survey responses from the respiratory therapist. Likert-type scales are used to generate subscores pertaining to: General Acceptability, Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability, and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability.
Subscales (evaluated separately):
General Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)] Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best) Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)]
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04165824
ALS
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05568615
ALS
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT04259255
ALS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05271435
ALS, PLS
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details