Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03481777

Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Acute Stroke (RESIST)

Our primary aim is to investigate whether remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as an adjunctive treatment can improve long-term recovery in acute stroke patients as an adjunct to standard treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DK, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Stroke is the second-leading cause of death worldwide and a leading cause of serious, long-term disability. The most common type is acute ischemic stroke (AIS) which occurs in 85% of cases. Acute cerebral thromboembolism leads to an area of permanent damage (infarct core) in the most severely hypoperfused area and a surrounding area of impaired, yet salvageable tissue known as the "ischemic penumbra".

Intravenous alteplase (IV tPA) and endovascular treatment (EVT) are approved acute reperfusion treatments of AIS to be started within the first 4½-6 hours (in some up to 24 hours) and as soon as possible after symptom onset to prevent the evolution of the infarct core. However, reperfusion itself may paradoxically result in tissue damage (reperfusion injury) and may contribute to infarct growth. Infarct progression can continue for days following a stroke, and failure of the collateral flow is a critical factor determining infarct growth.

On the other hand, in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) the culprit is an eruption of blood into the brain parenchyma causing tissue destruction with a massive effect on adjacent brain tissues. Hematoma expansion as well as inflammatory pathways that are activated lead to further tissue damage, edema, and penumbral hypoperfusion. The prognosis after ICH is poor with a one-month mortality of 40%.

Novel therapeutics and neuroprotective strategies that can be started ultra-early after symptom onset are urgently needed to reduce disability in both AIS and ICH.

Ischemic conditioning is one of the most potent activators of endogenous protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) can be applied as repeated short-lasting ischemia in a distant tissue that results in protection against subsequent long-lasting ischemic injury in the target organ. This protection can be applied prior to or during a prolonged ischemic event as remote ischemic pre-conditioning (RIPreC) and per-conditioning (RIPerC), respectively, or immediate after reperfusion as remote ischemic post-conditioning (RIPostC). RIC is commonly achieved by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to induce 5-minute cycles of limb ischemia alternating with 5 minutes of reperfusion.

Preclinical studies show that RIC induces a promising infarct reduction in an experimental stroke model. Results from a recent proof-of-concept study at our institution indicate that RIPerC applied during ambulance transportation as an adjunctive to in-hospital IV tPA increases brain tissue survival after one month. Furthermore, RIPerC patients had less severe neurological symptoms at admission and tended to have decreased perfusion deficits.

To-date, no serious adverse events have been documented in RIC.

RIC is a non-pharmacologic and non-invasive treatment without noticeable discomfort that has first-aid potential worldwide. However, whether combined remote ischemic per- and postconditioning can improve long-term recovery in AIS and ICH has never been investigated in a randomized controlled trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients (≥ 18 years)
  • Prehospital putative stroke (Prehospital Stroke Score, PreSS >= 1)
  • Onset of stroke symptoms < 4 hours before RIC/Sham-RIC
  • Independent in daily living before symptom onset (mRS ≤ 2)

Exclusion criteria

  • Intracranial aneurisms, intracranial arteriovenous malformation, cerebral neoplasm or abscess
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe peripheral arterial disease in the upper extremities
  • Concomitant acute life-threatening medical or surgical condition
  • Arteriovenous fistula in the arm selected for RIC

Treatment and study plan

remote ischemic conditioning

Device

RIC is commonly achieved by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to induce 5-minute cycles of limb ischemia alternating with 5 minutes of reperfusion.

Sham remote ischemic conditioning

Device

Sham Comparator (Sham-RIC)

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified Rankin Scale at 3 Months in Acute Stroke (AIS and ICH)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months in acute stroke patients (target diagnosis) (generalized ordinal logistic regression). The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors.

    the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death)

    If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency.

    • If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
    • If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment
    • the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment
    • If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference Neurological Impairment During the First 24 Hours

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Neurological deficits are documented using Prehospital Stroke Score (PreSS). Prehospital Stroke Score is assessed in the the ambulance and at 24-hour or at discharge (if discharge occurs before 24 hours). The PreSS score consists of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) with an additional opportunity to report other neurological symptoms (e.g. ataxia, sensory disturbances and visual field loss), and PASS (Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale). The PreSS score range from 0-6, with 6 representing the most severe neurological deficits.

  2. Clinical Outcome (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Time frame: 3 months

    Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months in acute stroke patients (target diagnosis) (generalized ordinal logistic regression). TThe assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors.

    the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency.

    If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

    If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

  3. Clinical Outcome (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Reperfusion Therapy

    Time frame: 3 months

    Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months inacute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy (generalized ordinal logistic regression). The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors.

    the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency.

    If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

    If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

  4. Clinical Outcome (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (generalized ordinal logistic regression).

    The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors.

    the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency.

    If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

    If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

  5. Difference in Proportion of Patients With Complete Remission of Symptoms Within 24 Hours (TIA; Both With and Without DWI)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference in proportion of patients with complete remission of symptoms within 24 hours (TIA; both with and without DWI) Diagnosis of TIA is documented in the electronic case report form

  6. Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebral Events (MACCE)

    Time frame: 3 months

    MACCE is defined as: Cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)

    Cardiovascular death: Death from known cardiovascular cause or sudden death from unknown cause (no identified cause of death in medical history and/or autopsy)

    Acute myocardial infarction: Admission with a discharge diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP)

    Stroke: Admission with a discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Evaluation is performed using the Danish National Patient Register (LPR) and the DSR at two time points (6 and 15 months after the inclusion of the last patient).

    Diagnosis of AIS/TIA, ICH and MI (STEMI, NSTEMI, and UAP) are made according to national clinical practice guidelines.

  7. Early Neurological Improvement in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients (AIS)

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Reduction in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 4 (baseline versus 24-Hour NIHSS). NIHSS range from 0 to 42, with higher scores representing worse neurological function.

  8. Early Neurological Improvement in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Reduction in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 4 (baseline versus 24-Hour NIHSS). NIHSS range from 0 to 42, with higher scores representing worse neurological function.

  9. Quality of Life Measures at 3 Months in AIS and ICH Patients

    Time frame: 3 months

    Quality of life (WHO-5 Well-Being Index) measures in AIS and ICH patients at 3 months

  10. Bed-day Use in AIS and ICH Patients

    Time frame: 3 months

    Bed-day use, measured at 3 months, in AIS and ICH patients

  11. Three-month and One-year Mortality

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

    All-cause mortality is assessed and subdivided into cardiovascular mortality versus non-cardiovascular mortality

Other outcomes

  1. Clinical Outcome [Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Ischemic Stroke Patients and the Extended Remote Ischemic Postconditioning Protocol (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital]

    Time frame: 3 months

    Clinical outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months in ischemic stroke patients and the extended remote ischemic postconditioning protocol Ordinal logistic regression analysis will be performed.The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors.

    the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency.

    If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

    If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

  2. Clinical Outcome (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients and the Extended Remote Ischemic Postconditioning Protocol (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months in intracerebral hemorrhage patients and the extended remote ischemic postconditioning protocol The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors.

    the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency.

    If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

    If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.

  3. Endovascular Treatment(EVT) -Eligibility (MRI Assessed) in RIC Treated AIS Patients With Large Vessel (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

    Time frame: 6 hours

    Proportion of RIC treated AIS patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) eligible to EVT treatment compared to standard treatment, adjusted for prehospital stroke severity (PreSS) and symptom duration

    • Severe Stroke (NIHSS ≥ 10)
    • Groin puncture feasible within 6 hours from stroke onset
    • MRI-time-of-flight (TOF) documented internal carotid artery (ICA), Intracranial ICA (ICA-T) and first and second stem of the middle cerebral artery (M1 and M2, respectively)
    • No contraindications to MRI (pacemaker, vomiting, respiratory insufficiency, obesity)
    • MRI-Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) lesion volume ≤ 70 mL
  4. Infarct Growth in AIS Patients (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

    Time frame: 24 hour

    24-hour infarct growth on DWI-MRI (Difference in lesion volume between acute and 24-hour DWI-MRI) (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

  5. Difference in Acute (24-hour) Hematoma Expansion in Patients With ICH (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

    Time frame: 24 hour

    24-hour hematoma growth (Difference in hematoma volume between acute and 24-hour CT/MRI) (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

  6. Difference in 7 Days Hematoma Volume in Patients With ICH (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

    Time frame: 7 days

    7-day hematoma reduction (Difference in hematoma volume between acute and 7-day (day 5 to 9) CT ) (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

  7. Ektacytometry and Analytical Flow Cytometry for eryNOS3 Phosphorylation

    Time frame: 12 months

    Ektacytometry for Erythrocytic Deformability and Analytical Flow Cytometry (FC) for eryNOS3 phosphorylation (pNOS3Ser1177) and s-nitrosylation (-SNO) in RBC

  8. MicroRNA and Extracellular Vesicle Profile of RIC-induced Neuroprotection

    Time frame: 12 months

    MicroRNA and extracellular vesicle characterization of a possible RIC treatment profile (substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

  9. Prehospital microRNA and Extracellular Vesicles (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Diagnostic abilities of a prehospital microRNA and extracellular vesicles blood samples profile combined with prehospital stroke severity on the differentiation of hemorrhagic from ischemic stroke and to grade ischemic stroke severity

  10. Prehospital Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Predictive abilities of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) in prehospital obtained blood samples combined with prehospital stroke severity to differentiate hemorrhagic from ischemic stroke and to grade ischemic stroke severity

  11. Coagulation Profile of Putative Stroke Patients in Prehospital Obtained Blood Samples

    Time frame: 12 months

    Functional and immunologic plasma assays will be employed to analyze proteins and pathways in coagulation and fibrinolysis (substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Grethe Andersen

Other

Collaborators

  • Central Denmark Region
  • Danish National Research Foundation

Registry information

Official study title

Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Acute Stroke: a Multicenter Randomized, Patient-assessor Blinded, Sham-controlled Study

Acronym: RESIST

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 27, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.