REmote Assessment and Dynamic Response Intervention II

The Preparation for Future Care Needs Scale (Short Form) assesses the degree to which an individual has engaged in planning for future care needs in late life using 15 items and 5 subscales representing distinct planning processes (awareness, gathering information, decision making, concrete planning, avoidance). Items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater preparation for future care needs.

Sorensen, S., Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., Pinquart, M., & Lyness, J. M. (2017). Assessing future care preparation in late life: Two short measures. Psychol Assess, 29(12), 1480-1495.

The Dyadic Relationship Scale assesses the positive dyadic interactions and negative dyadic strain experienced by caregivers (11 items) and care recipients (10 items). Items are averaged for a summary score that ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more positive interactions in the relationship, or more relationship strain, respectively.

Sebern, M.D. & Whitlatch, C.J. (2007). Dyadic Relationship Scale: A measure of the impact of the provision and receipt of family care. The Gerontologist, 47(6), 741-751.

The Care Values Scale assesses the importance of four care-related values to the person with dementia from the perspectives of the person with dementia and their care partner. Items for each of the four subscales are averaged for a summary score that ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater importance of the care value to the person with dementia.

Miller LM, Whitlatch CJ, Lee CS, Caserta MS. Care Values in Dementia: Patterns of Perception and Incongruence Among Family Care Dyads. The Gerontologist. 2018.

Subjective strain from caregiving will be assessed among family care partners at baseline and follow-up assessments using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), short-form (12 items). Scores range from 0-48 with higher scores indicating a greater degree of strain from providing care.

The Quality of Life: Alzheimer's Disease Scale assesses individual perceptions of quality of life (from poor to excellent) across 13 items. Items are averaged for a summary score of 1 to 4, higher scores indicating greater degree of quality of life. Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (1999). Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: Patient and Caregiver Reports. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 5(1), 21-32.

The Emotional Intimacy Disruptive Behavior Scale (8 items) assesses the frequency of engagement in behaviors to conceal emotions about an illness from one's partner. Druley, J. A., Stephens, M. A. P., & Coyne, J. C. (1997). Emotional and physical intimacy in coping with Lupus: Women's dilemmas of disclosure and approach. Health Psychology, 16, 506-514.

Time spent out of home will be robustly and accurately measured through an algorithm using sensor (motion/contact) and actigraphy data.

Petersen J, Austin D, Mattek N, Kaye J. Time Out-of-Home and Cognitive, Physical, and Emotional Wellbeing of Older Adults: A Longitudinal Mixed Effects Model. PloS one. 2015;10(10):e0139643.

Physical activity and sedentary bouts will be measured using actigraphy data.

Time spent together/separate as a dyad will be observed through previously-developed algorithms using data from PIR motion/contact sensors and actigraphy. We will consider times when the informal care dyad is together in the same room, separate within/outside of the home, and time in bathroom together (indicating ADL dependency).

Sleep patterns be measured using actigraphy, motion sensors, and a bed mat sensor.