Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06698471

Relief From Stress Via Social Protection in Senegal

Despite the growing prevalence of mental health disorders in low- and middle-income countries, significant barriers to seeking and accessing mental health services persist. Within lower income populations, the prevalence of mental health disorders and barriers to addressing them are worsened by poverty. Self-Help Plus is a group-based stress management program delivered using a task-sharing model and designed to circumvent barriers to addressing mental health concerns. Cultural adaptations of Self-Help Plus have been implemented in several countries and are considered cost-effective. However, to date, Self-Help Plus has not been adapted for Senegalese populations. The study detailed in this manuscript aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of Self-Help Plus in lower income populations in Senegal.

The study is a pilot feasibility cluster-randomized control trial of Self-Help Plus in four Senegalese communities. Clusters of social protection program beneficiaries will be randomly selected to receive five sessions of Self-Help Plus. The intervention will be delivered in groups of up to 30 beneficiaries and co-facilitated by two community workers. A combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods will be used to assess the feasibility and acceptability of both the Self-Help Plus intervention and randomized control trial procedures. The study sample will include social protection program beneficiaries in the treatment and control groups, Self-Help Plus facilitators, project staff supporting the training of facilitators, and the intervention supervisor.

The findings of this study will be used to inform the potential integration of Self-Help Plus and/or similar mental health interventions into the national social protection program in Senegal.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre de Recherche Pour le Développement Economique et Social (CRDES)

Dakar, Senegal

About this study

The primary objective of the pilot feasibility cluster-randomized controlled trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of both the Self-Help Plus intervention and trial procedures through the collection of quantitative and qualitative data. The study will include two trial arms: (1) a control treatment-as-usual arm and (2) an intervention arm that will receive the adapted Self Help Plus intervention. The findings of the research detailed in this protocol may be used to inform the design of a potential larger randomized control trial powered to assess the effectiveness of Self-Help Plus in Senegalese populations. Additional secondary objectives of the pilot feasibility study are listed below.

  • Assess feasibility of cluster randomization procedure to limit biases and risk of contamination;
  • Determine recruitment and retention rates for Self-Help Plus sessions;
  • Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of intervention delivery by Self-Help Plus trained non-specialists;
  • Assess the safety of an abbreviated training curriculum (during training, intervention delivery, and supervision);
  • Assess feasibility and acceptability of outcome measures;
  • Assess ethics and safety of trial procedures using the adverse event protocol;

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Community Worker facilitators of the intervention:
  • Patients: Enrolled in the World Bank Social Protection Programme

Exclusion criteria

  • Community Worker facilitators of the intervention
  • Patients: Persons with a severe mental disorder or suicidality

Treatment and study plan

Community worker training

Other

Training community workers in Self Help Plus intervention, a 5 session self-help intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Referral to Health System

Other

Referral to Health System of Senegal

Primary outcomes

  1. Engagement

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks

    Of those who were offered the intervention, at least 25% attended one or more sessions.

  2. Retention

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks

    At least 50% of the ever-attended beneficiaries attended at least any 4 intervention sessions

  3. Fidelity

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks

    Fidelity to intervention elements at the level of 75% or greater according to the mean fidelity checklist for intervention elements across all sessions. Number of feasibility domains: n=15; higher is better, scored on 0-100%

Secondary outcomes

  1. General Health Questionnaire-12

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Brief psychological well-being scale. Score range: 0-36; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  2. General Health Questionnaire-12

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief psychological well-being scale. Score range: 0-36; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  3. General Health Questionnaire-12

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief psychological well-being scale. Score range: 0-36; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  4. Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Brief depression screening instrument. Score range: 0-27; Higher score indicates worse depressive symptoms

  5. Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief depression screening instrument. Score range: 0-27; Higher score indicates worse depressive symptoms

  6. Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief depression screening instrument. Score range: 0-27; Higher score indicates worse depressive symptoms

  7. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Brief anxiety screening instrument. Score range: 0-21; Higher score indicates worse anxiety symptoms

  8. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief anxiety screening instrument. Score range: 0-21; Higher score indicates worse anxiety symptoms

  9. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief anxiety screening instrument. Score range: 0-21; Higher score indicates worse anxiety symptoms

  10. Brief Resilience Scale

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Brief resilience measure. Score range: 0-30; Higher score indicates better resilience

  11. Brief Resilience Scale

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief resilience measure. Score range: 0-30; Higher score indicates better resilience

  12. Brief Resilience Scale

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief resilience measure. Score range: 0-30; Higher score indicates better resilience

  13. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Brief scale of psychological flexibility. Score range: 0-35; Higher score indicates worse psychological flexibility

  14. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief scale of psychological flexibility. Score range: 0-35; Higher score indicates worse psychological flexibility

  15. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief scale of psychological flexibility. Score range: 0-35; Higher score indicates worse psychological flexibility

  16. Self Efficacy

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Brief scale of self efficacy. Score range: 0-24; Higher score indicates better self efficacy

  17. Self Efficacy

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief scale of self efficacy. Score range: 0-24; Higher score indicates better self efficacy

  18. Self Efficacy

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief scale of self efficacy. Score range: 0-24; Higher score indicates better self efficacy

  19. Locus of control questionnaire

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Brief scale measuring locus of control. Score range: 0-20; Higher score indicates better locus of control

  20. Locus of control questionnaire

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief scale measuring locus of control. Score range: 0-20; Higher score indicates better locus of control

  21. Locus of control questionnaire

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Brief scale measuring locus of control. Score range: 0-20; Higher score indicates better locus of control

Other outcomes

  1. Culture-specific measure of distress - Thinking too much

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  2. Culture-specific measure of distress - Thinking too much

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  3. Culture-specific measure of distress - Thinking too much

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  4. Culture-specific measure of distress - Feelings that hurt the heart

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  5. Culture-specific measure of distress - Feelings that hurt the heart

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  6. Culture-specific measure of distress - Feelings that hurt the heart

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being

  7. Culture-specific measure of well being - Heart has felt calm

    Time frame: Prior to initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of well being; Score range: 0-3; Higher score indicates better well being

  8. Culture-specific measure of well being - Heart has felt calm

    Time frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of well being; Score range: 0-3; Higher score indicates better well being

  9. Culture-specific measure of well being - Heart has felt calm

    Time frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment

    Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of well being; Score range: 0-3; Higher score indicates better well being

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Georgetown University

Other

Collaborators

  • Centre de Recherche Pour le Développement Economique et Social (CRDES)
  • World Bank

Registry information

Official study title

Relief From Stress Via Social Protection in Senegal (RESTORE): Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Cluster-randomized Control Trial of Self-Help Plus (SH+) in Senegal.

Acronym: RESTORE

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 21, 2024
Registry last updated
May 2, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.