Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04652999

Relaxation Intervention in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are one of the most serious complications of diabetes and can lead to amputations in 85% of cases, resulting in physical, psychological, family, social and economic consequences. Psychological interventions can contribute to the improvement of wound healing and, relaxation, in particular, seems to contribute to faster wound healing. More research is needed to assess the effectiveness of different types of intervention on different types of wounds, in particular on chronic wounds such as DFU.

This is a Pilot Randomised Controlled Study of a Psychological Intervention that aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a muscle relaxation intervention with guided imagery (experimental group - EG) compared to a neutral guided imagery placebo (active control group - ACG) and a group that does not receive any psychological intervention (passive control group - PCG), to inform a future definitive Randomised Controlled Study (RCT) that tests its effectiveness. This study will also examine, qualitatively, the perspectives of patients with DFU on the relaxation intervention, in order to check its acceptability and applicability; as well as the perspectives of health professionals on this adjuvant therapy, its applicability and integration into the care system of multidisciplinary diabetic foot consultations.

Participants have a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Foot; one or two chronic ulcers active at the time of assessment; and clinical levels of stress or anxiety or depression. Participants will be randomized by the three conditions - EG, ACG and PCG - and assessed on the day of the first consultation or nursing treatment for chronic DFU (T0), two months later (T1), and six months later (T2; follow-up). Two weeks after T1, an interview will be conducted with patients with DFU that benefited from the relaxation sessions and to the health professionals who provided them the DFU care.

The results of the present study will contribute for a better understanding of DFU progression, healing, prevention of re-ulceration and future amputations and, consequently, for the improvement of patients' quality of life.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Clínica do Pé Diabético, Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa, Penafiel, Portugal

Loading trial locations.

About this study

General Aims:

This pilot RCT aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a muscle relaxation intervention with guided imagery (experimental group - GE) compared to a neutral guided imagery placebo (active control group - ACG) and a group that does not receive any psychological intervention (passive control group - PCG), prior to the implementation of a future definitive RCT that will assess its effectiveness.

This study will also examine, qualitatively, the perspectives of patients with DFU regarding the relaxation intervention, in order to check its acceptability and applicability; as well as the perspectives of health professionals on this adjuvant therapy, its applicability and integration into the multidisciplinary team of diabetic foot consultations.

Pilot RCT specific aims:

  • To evaluate the rates of eligibility, recruitment and adherence to the study protocol, participation in follow-up, and withdrawal. The degree of patient satisfaction with the relaxation intervention will also be assessed.
  • To verify the feasibility of the assessment protocol and to obtain preliminary estimates of the effects of the intervention on health outcome measures (degree of DFU healing, DFU-related quality of life, anxiety, depression and stress, DFU representations and physical and mental quality of life);
  • Synthesize the information to estimate the sample size required for a future definitive RCT.

Qualitative study nested in Pilot RCT specific aims:

  • To understand the perspective of patients and health professionals about the relaxation sessions;
  • To explore the contribution of the relaxation sessions to the DFU healing and patients' quality of life;
  • To describe the changes perceived in the patient during the period of relaxation sessions;
  • To analyse the relevance of implementing relaxation sessions in the multidisciplinary team consultation of diabetic foot.

Data Analysis:

To assess the feasibility of this pilot study (aim 1), the rates of eligibility, recruitment and adherence to the study protocol, participation in the follow-up and withdrawal will be calculated and its results will be presented in percentage. The results of the degree of satisfaction with the intervention will be presented through mean and standard deviation. To obtain preliminary estimates of the intervention effects' on health outcome measures (aim 2), descriptive measures of the respective variables (means and standard deviations) will be calculated and Generalised Mixed Models will be used to check for statistically significant differences over time, in the different groups. Data will be analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 for Mac. Finally, from the data obtained, the sample size for a future definitive RCT will be calculated (aim 3).

To answer the aims 4 to 7, a semi-structured interview guide consisting of open-ended questions will be administered to patients with DFU that benefited from the relaxation sessions and to the health professionals who provided them the DFU care. This script will remain unchanged throughout the interviews. The audio recording of the interviews will be done using a tablet, transcribed verbatim and anonymised in order to safeguard participants and data confidentiality. The transcripts of the interviews will be analysed in the same order as conducted, using the thematic content analysis technique (Bardin, 2016).

Sample size calculation:

The sample size calculation for a pilot RCT, considering the average effect size of 0.5, a statistical power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, revealed that 12 participants were needed in each of the groups (Cocks & Torgerson, 2013). This approach considers that a one-sided 80% confidence interval for the effect size will exclude the minimum clinically significant difference if the null hypothesis is true (Brown & Lilford, 2006).

Procedure:

The doctor or nurse, in the medical appointment, identifies patients that meet the medical inclusion criteria. Patients are invited to participate in the study by the Researcher at the end of the medical appointment and are informed about the aims of the study and the voluntary nature of participation through informed and informative consent. If patients agree to participate, they will sign the consent form. Nurses will then complete RESVECH 2.0 at the end of the appointment and doctors will complete the clinical questionnaire. Afterwards, the Researcher will accompany the patient to a room provided by the Hospital in order to administer the battery of questionnaires in the interview format.

After answering the questionnaires, the researcher will score the PSS and HADS instruments to identify the presence of significant clinical levels of stress, anxiety and depression, and if the patient is eligible, at the end of that week, the participant will be randomized into one of three possible groups.

In the next diabetic foot appointment, the respective participant will be informed about the group to which he or she has been allocated and whether will benefit, if appropriate, from four sessions of relaxation (EG) or neutral guided imagery (ACG), depending on the group. If the participant is available, the first session will take place on the same day. The following sessions will be scheduled according to the medical diabetic foot consultations. In each session, two assessments of blood pressure and heart rate will be performed, before starting the session and at the end of the session. At the end of the fourth session, the T1 assessment will be performed, with a new administration of the questionnaires. Six months after T0, the T2 (follow-up) evaluation will take place, with the last administration of the questionnaires.

The interviews with patients, who completed the four sessions of relaxation, and with health professionals, will be conducted two weeks after T1, by a different researcher than the one involved in the intervention, to reduce the bias of social desirability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diabetes Mellitus diagnosis;
  • Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot;
  • Having one or two active chronic ulcers (> 6 weeks) at the time of the assessment;
  • Being followed at the Multidisciplinary Consultation of the Diabetic Foot from the Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), at the Diabetic Foot Clinic from the Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa (CHTS) and from the Hospital de Braga;
  • Presenting clinical levels of stress (scores greater than 13 for males and greater than 17 for females on the Perceived Stress Scale) or anxiety or depression (scores greater than 11 on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale).

Exclusion criteria

  • The active DFU at the time of the assessment being a relapse;
  • Having more than two DFU currently active;
  • Being on hemodialysis treatment;
  • Presence of psychosis or dementia described in the patient's medical record;
  • Having cancer disease;
  • Having undergone a transplant;
  • Receiving psychological counselling at the time of the assessment.

For the qualitative study nested in the Pilot RCT, participants must meet the same inclusion and exclusion criteria defined above, plus being allocated to the EG and have completed the four intervention sessions. From those participants, the following cases will be selected:

  • Three typical cases of patients with neuropathic foot defined by the presence of neuropathic pain (e.g., heat, tingling, electrical shock), presence of distal pulses by palpation, and loss of protective sensitivity;
  • Three typical cases of patients with neuroischemic foot defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease, intense-variable pain, absence of distal pulses by palpation, and variable protective sensitivity.

Treatment and study plan

Muscle Relaxation with Guided Imagery

Behavioral

Relaxation intervention session begins with diaphragmatic breathing, followed by Jacobson's progressive muscle relaxation, which involves the contraction and subsequent relaxation of the 16 muscle groups of the body (forearm, arm, upper forehead, eye, mouth, jaw and throat, neck, shoulder, chest, stomach, thigh, leg and foot). The contraction is performed for 7 seconds while the relaxation lasts for about 40 to 50 seconds. The relaxation of the foot muscle group is only performed on the healthy foot, because dressing and bandages may bandage the foot with the DFU, which together with the typical joint stiffness of the diabetic foot, make it difficult to perform. After muscle relaxation, begins the guided imagery focused on DFU healing. The patient is instructed to think about his/her current state of health and to imagine the DFU as a dark area and the healing relaxation as a light associated to pleasant sensations, which will focus on the foot with DFU to heal it.

Neutral Guided Imagery

Behavioral

This placebo consists on neutral guided imagery focused on themes of the patient's daily life before having DFU. Each session has a theme associated with the patient's life - family, work, friends and leisure. Initially, the patient is asked to think about an event related to the theme of the session of his/her choice, be it positive or negative, which occurred before patient has the current DFU. Then, questions are asked which allow a more detailed reconstruction of the event and the patient is asked to imagine according only to the instructions given. When the whole episode is remembered, the patient is asked to tell what he or she imagined/remembered in each of the questions given.

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of eligibility

    Time frame: Baseline (T0)

    This rate will result from the proportion between the number of eligible patients and the total number of observed patients, in percentage.

  2. Rate of recruitment

    Time frame: Baseline (T0)

    This rate will result from the proportion between the number of patients who accepted to participate and the number of eligible patients, in percentage.

  3. Rate of refusal

    Time frame: Baseline (T0)

    This rate will result from the proportion between the number of patients who rejected to participate in the study and the number of patients invited to participate, in percentage.

  4. Rate of adherence to the study protocol

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    This rate will result from the proportion between the number of patients who performed the assessments/intervention sessions and the number of patients who completed the baseline assessment (T0), in percentage.

  5. Rate of participation in follow-up

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    This rate will result from the proportion between the number of patients who participated in follow-up assessment and the number of patients who completed the baseline assessment (T0), presented in percentage.

  6. Rate of dropout

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    This rate will result from the proportion between the number of patients who dropout the study and the number of patients who completed the baseline assessment (T0), presented in percentage.

  7. Patient satisfaction with the relaxation intervention

    Time frame: End of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1)

    The degree of patients´ satisfaction with the relaxation intervention will be assessed through questions developed for this purpose, including the degree of general satisfaction with the sessions; the impact on stress, anxiety and depression, and wound healing after the four sessions; the degree of usefulness for patients with DFU; the desire to participate in future sessions; and the recommendation of the sessions to other patients with DFU. All the questions will be assessed on a Likert scale from 1 (very unsatisfied/ none/ totally disagree) to 5 (very satisfied/ extreme/ totally agree).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Degree of DFU healing

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The degree of DFU healing will be assessed with the Portuguese version of "Resultados esperados de la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas crónicas" Scale [Expected results of the evaluation and evolution of the healing of chronic wounds Scale - RESVECH 2.0] (Marques, 2015). The scores range from 0 to 35, where zero indicates complete healing.

  2. Impact of DFU on patients' Quality of Life

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form (DFS-SF; Bann, Fehnel, & Gagnon, 2003; Research version by Pereira & Ferreira, 2018) will be used to assess patients´ DFU-related Quality of Life. Raw scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. Higher results correspond to better DFU-related quality of life.

  3. Physical Quality of Life

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36; Ferreira, 1998; Ferreira, Ferreira, & Pereira, 2012) will be administered to assess patients' physical Health-related Quality of Life. Raw scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. Higher results correspond to better physical quality of life.

  4. Mental Quality of Life

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36; Ferreira, 1998; Ferreira, Ferreira, & Pereira, 2012) will be administered to assess patients' mental Health-related Quality of Life. Raw scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. Higher results correspond to better mental quality of life.

  5. Perceived Stress

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The overall stress perceived by the patient will be assessed through the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; Trigo, Canudo, Branco, & Silva, 2010).

    Scores range between 0 and 40, with higher results indicating higher levels of perceived stress.

  6. Emotional Distress

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The emotional distress will be assessed through the total score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, comprising both anxiety and depression scales (HADS; Pais-Ribeiro et al., 2007). Scores range between 0 and 42, with higher results indicating higher levels of distress.

  7. Anxiety symptoms

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The anxious symptomatology will be assessed through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Pais-Ribeiro et al., 2007). Scores range between 0 and 21, with higher results indicating higher levels of anxiety symptoms.

  8. Depression symptoms

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The depressive symptomatology will be assessed through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Pais-Ribeiro et al., 2007). Scores range between 0 and 21, with higher results indicating higher levels of depression symptoms.

  9. Adherence to DFU Care

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    Patient adherence to DFU care will be assessed through the DFU Care Adherence Questionnaire (Research Version by Pereira, Dantas, Brandão, Santos, Carvalho, & Ferreira, 2018), which was developed for this study, according to the guidelines of the Portuguese General Direction of Health (DGS, 2010) and the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF, 2015). Higher scores indicate better adherence to DFU care.

  10. Representations regarding the DFU

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    Patient representations regarding the DFU will be evaluated through the Illness Perception Questionnaire - Brief (IPQ-B; Figueiras et al., 2010). The response scale ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more threatening representations regarding DFU.

  11. Systolic Pressure

    Time frame: Before and after each intervention (EG) or placebo (ACG) at 2 weeks (1st Session), 4 weeks (2nd Session), 6 weeks (3rd Session) and 8 weeks (4th Session), after the baseline (T0)

    Systolic pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) will be assessed through a validated and certified blood pressure measuring device.

  12. Diastolic Pressure

    Time frame: Before and after each intervention (EG) or placebo (ACG) at 2 weeks (1st Session), 4 weeks (2nd Session), 6 weeks (3rd Session) and 8 weeks (4th Session), after the baseline (T0)

    Diastolic pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) will be assessed through a validated and certified blood pressure measuring device.

  13. Heart rate

    Time frame: Before and after each intervention (EG) or placebo (ACG) at 2 weeks (1st Session), 4 weeks (2nd Session), 6 weeks (3rd Session) and 8 weeks (4th Session), after the baseline (T0)

    Heart rate in beats per minute (bpm) will be assessed through a validated and certified blood pressure measuring device.

Other outcomes

  1. Sociodemographic Data

    Time frame: Baseline (T0)

    The following socio-demographic data will be collected: gender; age; living environment; marital status; professional status; monthly income; if there is an informal caregiver, what is the degree of kinship with the caregiver and the quality of the patient's relationship with the caregiver; as well as some questions regarding access to health care.

  2. Health Literacy

    Time frame: Baseline (T0)

    The level of health literacy will be assessed through the Medical Term Recognition Test (METER; Paiva et al., 2014).

  3. Clinical Data

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after a six month follow-up (T2)

    The clinical data collected through a clinical questionnaire developed for this study will be: alcohol and tobacco consumption, presence and intensity of ulcer-related pain, and other symptomatic foot complaints; the type and duration of diabetes, HbA1c levels, duration of diabetic foot ulcer, type of foot and type of ulcer (PEDIS classification), location of the ulcer, recognised complications and comorbidities, type of treatment provided at the consultation, number of medical and nursing visits, date of DFU healing, and appearance of new ulcers. Psychophysiological parameters such as transcutaneous O2 pressure (TCPO2) where appropriate; blood pressure and heart rate; will also be assessed, the latter two being evaluated by an automatic blood pressure measuring device.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Minho

Other

Collaborators

  • Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal

Registry information

Official study title

Relaxation Intervention in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With a Nested Qualitative Study

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 4, 2020
Registry last updated
May 19, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.