Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07396012

Relation Between Degree of Lumbar Spine Curvature and Dynamic Knee Valgus in Smartphone Addicts

The purpose of this study will be to investigate the relation between degree of lumbar spine curvature and dynamic knee valgus angle in smartphone addict students with non-specific low back pain.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Dawlat Mazen Mahmoud

Giza, Egypt

About this study

Smartphone usage can potentially cause musculoskeletal disorders in the lower back. Continuous smartphone use has been shown to create proprioception impairments in the cervical vertebra and postural alterations in the cervical and lumbar vertebrae (slouched posture)

Understanding the relationship between lumbar spine curvature (hyperlordosis, hypolordosis) and knee valgus angle is crucial for:

  • Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Excessive knee valgus increases knee injury risk.
  • Abnormal lumbar curvature (hyper lordosis) may alter lower limb kinematics, contributing to knee malalignment.
  • Improving Rehabilitation Strategies: If lumbar posture influences knee mechanics, interventions (such as core stabilization) could reduce valgus and injury risk.
  • Ergonomics: Sedentary lifestyles and poor posture may exacerbate both spinal misalignment and knee valgus, increasing osteoarthritis risk.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects from both genders with an age range between 18 and 25 years old.
  • Sound physical and mental health.
  • Body mass index 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2.
  • Subjects with chronic low back pain. Smart phone addiction.

Exclusion criteria

  • Stroke
  • Balance problems
  • Visual problems
  • Any other physical disorder that may affect our measurement
  • Pregnancy
  • Obesity
  • Comorbidities such as cardiovascular or respiratory conditions

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Lumbar spinal curvature

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Kinovea software program will be used to assess lumbar curvature mainly the cobb angle of lumbar lordosis.

    Colored markers can be placed on key anatomical landmarks ( spinous processes of L1-L5) while the subject stands in a relaxed, natural posture with feet shoulder-width apart.

    the image will be captured from a lateral (side) view of the spine. and the Kinovea software will analyze and measure angle. Normal Lumbar Lordosis: ~30-60° (varies by method), hyperlordosis: >60° (excessive curvature), hypolordosis (Flat Back): <30° (reduced curvature).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of pain intensity

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    A visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to measure the intensity of low back pain. With a score of 0 for no pain and 10 for the worst pain ever. Patients rated their level of pain as mild if they scored 3.4 or less, moderate if they scored 3.5 to 7.4, and severe if they scored 7.5 or higher.

  2. Assessment of smart phone addiction

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    The smart phone addiction scale (SAS) will be used to assess smartphone addiction.

    This is a valid and reliable 10-question measure for diagnosing smartphone addiction. Each question has a potential value ranging from 1 to 6, and the overall questionnaire score can range from 10 to 60 points. A score of 34 is regarded a cut-off for smartphone addiction, with higher values suggesting stronger addiction.

  3. Assessment of quadriceps muscle strength

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Hand held dynamometer will be used to assess quadriceps muscle strength. The patient sat on a chair with 90° hip/knee flexion; dynamometer placed 2-5 centimeters above malleoli on anterior tibia. the patient will be asked to push your leg forward as hard as possible.

    Test execution:

    Contraction Type: Isometric (hold 3-5 seconds (sec)). Trials: 3 repetitions (30-sec rest between trials). Recording: Peak force from the best of 3 trials. Normal measuring: Men: ~35-45 kg (77-99 lbs). Women: ~25-35 kg (55-77 lbs)

  4. Assessment of dynamic knee valgus angle

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Kinovea software will be used to assess the dynamic knee valgus angle from a frontal view during a single-leg squat. Marks will be placed on hip at anterior superior iliac spine, Knee midpoint, and ankle midpoint. Measure the angle between the hip-knee-ankle line (180° = neutral, <180° = valgus). The depth of the squat task to 60°will be determined by placing a block behind the participant, and the gluteal muscles contact the block at 60° knee flexion. The non-dominant leg will be held with 90° knee flexion and 45° hip flexion during the whole task. The test will be considered successful if: 1) the person maintains the correct position during the test; 2) he performs the test at the predetermined pace; 3) the suspended leg does not touch the ground; 4) the heel of the dominant foot rests on the ground.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dawlat M Mahmoud, Master

CONTACT

[email protected]

01002757708

Dina Sayed, PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01282742057

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Relation Between Degree of Lumbar Spine Curvature and Dynamic Knee Valgus in Smartphone Addict With Non-specific Low Back Pain

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.