Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04578314

RELATE - Efficacy and Feasibility of a Cognitive Behavioural Module for Distressing Auditory Verbal Hallucinations

Auditory hallucinations (AH) are associated with distress and reduced functioning. Psychological interventions show some promising effects on psychopathology but have been less successful in reducing AH related distress, which patients report to be a priority. Research suggests that distress is associated with the hearer relating to AH in a passive and subordinate manner. A novel approach thus teaches assertive responses to AH through the use of experiential role-plays. A single centre pilot study in the United Kingdom evidenced a large effect of this approach on AH distress but independent multicentre studies are required to ascertain effectiveness across different settings. The planned feasibility trial aims to estimate the expected effect for a subsequent fully powered prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, two-armed, multicentre, open trial set up to demonstrate that adding a Relating Module (RM) to Treatment as Usual (TAU) is superior to TAU alone. Feasibility questions relate to patient recruitment, therapist training and therapy monitoring in different types of psychological and psychiatric outpatient facilities.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Auditory hallucinations (AH) are associated with distress and reduced functioning. Psychological interventions show some promising effects on psychopathology but have been less successful in reducing AH related distress, which patients report to be a priority. Research suggests that distress is associated with the hearer relating to AH in a passive and subordinate manner. A novel approach thus teaches assertive responses to AH through the use of experiential role-plays. A single centre pilot study in the United Kingdom evidenced a large effect of this approach on AH distress but independent multicentre studies are required to ascertain effectiveness across different settings. The planned feasibility trial aims to estimate the expected effect for a subsequent fully powered prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, two-armed, multicentre, open trial set up to demonstrate that adding a Relating Module (RM) to Treatment as Usual (TAU) is superior to TAU alone. Feasibility questions relate to patient recruitment, therapist training and therapy monitoring in different types of psychological and psychiatric outpatient facilities. A total of 75 patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (ICD-10, F2) and persistent distressing AH will be recruited across 4 sites and receive either 16 50-minute sessions of RM plus TAU or TAU alone within a 5-months period. Assessments will take place at baseline, at 5 months (post-intervention) and at 9 months (primary outcome).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Participants will;

  • have a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (ICD-10, F2, confirmed by SCID-5)
  • patients will be reporting distressing AH for at least six months (to be beyond the startle and adjustment phase ) and score ≥ 3 on either item 8 or item 9 of the PSYRATS-AH;
  • be ≥ 16 years of age
  • be judged able to understand the full implications of their decision by the responsible psychiatrist or clinical psychologist.

Exclusion criteria

Participant must not:

  • have AH with a clear organic cause (e.g. brain disease or injury):
  • have exclusively hypnagogic or hypnopompic AH,
  • have a primary diagnosis of acute substance dependence (F1x.2)
  • have completed a course of CBT for psychotic symptoms during the past year within which distressing AH have been targeted
  • be currently participating, or be confirmed to participate in another interventional study in which they are receiving an intervention which utilizes psychological therapy ;
  • be non-German speaking to the degree that the participant is unable to fully understand and answer assessment questions or give informed consent;
  • be at immediate and serious risk to self or other.

Treatment and study plan

Relating Therapy

Behavioral

Relating Therapy (RT) is a symptom-specific behaviourally oriented intervention that targets interpersonal relating as a key mechanism associated with auditory hallucination distress. The aim is that patients learn to relate more assertively within the difficult relationships they have with both the auditory hallucinations and other people. The RT will follow a treatment manual consisting of three phases: 1. Socialization to relating therapy and its implications; 2. Exploration of themes within the relational history of the participant and their experience of relationships with AH, and interpersonal relating within the family and social environment (identifying any prominent themes, such as abuse, disempowerment, or rivalry); 3. Exploration and development of assertive approaches to relating to AH and other people.

Treatment as Usual

Other

TAU will include medication management, supportive brief counselling sessions and various types of psychosocial (e.g. social work guided support, peer support) and monitoring provided by Mental Health Services, with individual and family psychological therapies offered occasionally. Individual therapies may include CBT or psychodynamic interventions. To amend for the heterogeneity of TAU across centres, the type and extent of any treatment received will be protocolled at T1 and T2.

Primary outcomes

  1. The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales-AH-Distress factor score (PSYRATS-AH)

    Time frame: 9 months after baseline assessment

    Auditory hallucination associated distress. The distress factor score of the PSYRATS-AH is the primary outcome as this is what has been prioritized by patients and is relevant to functioning. Confirmatory analysis will be conducted based on the intent-to-treat population (ITT), defined on the basis of the ITT principle. The aim is to show that the intervention group is superior to the control meaning that the mean score at 9 months adjusted for the baseline value is lower in the intervention group than in the control group. Lower scores indicate less distress.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time Budget Measure

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    Time that ist spent in social and vocational activities

  2. EuroQuol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D-5L)

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    Health-related quality of life

  3. Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    Patients are interviewed about thoughts of wanting to complete suicide, active suicidal thoughts and intent to act on such thoughts (suicidal ideation, items 1-5) as well as about preparatory acts, aborted, interrupted or actual attempts (suicidal behaviour, 6-9). Completed suicide is rated on item 10. Scores on this scale range from 0 to 43 with higher scores indicating higher suicidal ideation

  4. Number of rehospitalizations

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    Number of hospitalizations after study enrollment

  5. he Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales - PSYRATS-AH-Frequency

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    Frequency of auditory hallucinations. Ranges from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher frequency of auditory hallucinations

  6. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    Self-report scale measuring depressive symptoms. Total score ranges from 0 to 21with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms

Other outcomes

  1. The Voice and You (VAY)

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    To analyse whether the putative intervention effect is explicable by the changes in the processes targeted (improved relating to AH), two self-report scales will measure relating to AH. The VAY is a 29-item measure of interrelating between the hearer and their predominant voice (see above for a description of the development of this measure). Relating is measured across four scales; two concerning the hearer's perception of the relating of the voice-voice dominance and voice intrusiveness; and two concerning the relating of the hearer-hearer distance and hearer dependence. Each item is measured on a four-point scale (0-3). Higher scores indicate more negative relating.

  2. Relating to Voices/Others Questionnaires (APPROVE)

    Time frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

    The APPROVE consists of two separate scales: A 46-item measure of relating to voices (Approve-Voices); and a 46-item measure of social relating (Approve-Social). The items were preceded by an introductory text inviting participants to "please select the answer that best reflects your typical response to [voices/other people] on the scale 0 (disagree completely) to 10 (agree completely). Where the item is not relevant to you then please select the not applicable (N/A) option". The following instruction - "When [voices/other people] are being difficult (e.g., treating me badly), I respond by: (...)" is presented before the list of the items (e.g., "Hearing what they are saying but also stating my own views").

  3. Feasibility recruitment

    Time frame: through study completion, approximately two years after recruitment commenced

    Will count the number of patients referred within each site, number of self-referrals within each site, number of referred patients within each site found to be eligible, number and proportion of consenting and eligible participants who attend 5-month and 9 month assessment within each site

  4. Feasibility completeness

    Time frame: through study completion, approximately 3 years after first participant has been randomized

    Will count the number and proportion of consenting participants within the RM condition who reach the point of therapy 'exposure' (attended at least 8 of 16 therapy sessions), percentage of complete of data sets

  5. Therapist adherence

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 weeks after baseline assessment

    All therapy sessions will be audio-recorded. For the first participant for each therapist, one recording from the early phase of therapy (sessions 1-6) and one recording from a later phase of therapy (sessions 7-14) will be randomly selected by the trial manager. The recordings will be translated, transcribed and sent to Dr Hayward for review. Therapist adherence to the treatment protocol will be assessed by Dr. Hayward who will assess two randomly selected recordings per therapist. Adherence will be rated using an adapted version of the Cognitive Therapy Scale for Psychosis (CTS-psy). Items F, G, and H have been adapted to include relating specific items in place of cognitive therapy (e.g. "Focus on the link between cognition and affect" was replaced with "focus on the effects of the patient engaging in different patterns of relating").

  6. Safety monitoring

    Time frame: through study completion; 9 months after baseline assessment

    Will count the number of adverse events and serious adverse events

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Hamburg-Eppendorf

Other

Collaborators

  • Charite University, Berlin, Germany
  • Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
  • University of Leipzig
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Registry information

Official study title

RELATE - A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cognitive Behavioural Module for Distressing Auditory Verbal Hallucinations

Acronym: RELATE

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 8, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.