Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03642717

Regulatory Request NIS in Korea

To monitor the safety profile and effectiveness of JARDIANCE DUO® in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a routine clinical practice setting

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have started at first time on JARDIANCE DUO® in accordance with the approved label in Korea
  • Age ≥19 years at enrolment
  • Patients who have signed on the data release consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with previous exposure to JARDIANCE®, JARDIANCE DUO®
  • Hypersensitivity to active ingredients empagliflozin and/or metformin or to any of the excipients
  • Moderate (stage 3b) and severe renal failure (CrCl < 45 ml/min or eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 square meter)
  • Acute conditions with the potential to alter renal function such as: dehydration, severe infection, cardiovascular collapse (shock), acute myocardial infarction, sepsis
  • Type1 diabetes, acute or chronic metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis with or without coma, history of a ketoacidosis (type 1 diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis should be treated with insulin).
  • Congestive heart failure requiring pharmacologic management, in particular those with unstable or acute congestive heart failure
  • Radiologic studies involving the use of intravascular iodinated contrast materials (for example, intravenous urogram, intravenous cholangiography, angiography, and computed tomography (CT) scans with intravascular contrast materials)
  • Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media may lead to acute renal failure and has been associated with lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin.

Therefore, in patients with eGFR > 60ml/min/1.73m2, JARDIANCE DUO® must be discontinued prior to, or at the time of the test and not be reinstituted until 48 hours afterwards, and only after renal function has been re-evaluated and has not deteriorated further. In patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR 45-60 ml/min/1.73m2), JARDIANCE DUO® must be discontinued 48 hours before administration of iodinated contrast media and not be reinstituted until at least 48 hours afterwards, and only after renal function has been re-evaluated and has not deteriorated further.

  • In patients with severe infections or severe traumatic systemic disorders, JARDIANCE DUO® should be temporarily suspended, and should not be restarted until the patient's oral intake has resumed and renal function has been evaluated as normal.
  • JARDIANCE DUO® should be temporarily suspended for any surgical procedure(except minor procedures not associated with restricted intake of food and fluids)before 48 hours, and not be reinstituted until 48 hours afterwards, after renal function has been evaluated as normal.
  • Patients with malnutrition, starvation, hypostheniam pituitary or adrenal insufficiency
  • Impaired hepatic function (since impaired hepatic function has been associated with some cases of lactic acidosis, JARDIANCE DUO® should generally be avoided in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic disease), pulmonary infarction, severe respiratory impairment, any condition associated with hypoxemia, excessive alcohol intake, GI disorders such as dehydration, diarrhoea or vomiting
  • Pregnant women, women who may be pregnant, nursing women
  • Disease which may cause tissue hypoxia (especially acute disease, or worsening of chronic disease) such as: decompensated heart failure, respiratory failure, recent myocardial infarction, shock
  • Current participation in other clinical trials

Treatment and study plan

JARDIANCE DUO®

Drug

empagliflozin and metformin

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Any Adverse Events

    Time frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.

    Percentage of participants with any adverse events was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Relating to Study Drug

    Time frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.

    Percentage of participants with adverse events relating to study drug was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Unexpected Adverse Events

    Time frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.

    Percentage of participants with unexpected adverse events was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest

    Time frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.

    Percentage of participants with adverse events of special interest was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of the Drug

    Time frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.

    Percentage of participants with adverse events leading to discontinuation of the drug was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit From Baseline

    Time frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Change in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.

  2. Number of Participants Reached Target Effectiveness Response in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c < 7%) at Last Visit

    Time frame: At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Number of participants reached target effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c < 7%) at Last Visit was reported. Target effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was defined as HbA1c less than 7%.

  3. Number of Participants With Relative Effectiveness Response in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c Decrease of 0.5% Comparing to Baseline) at Last Visit

    Time frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Number of participants with relative effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit was reported. Relative effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at last visit was defined as HbA1c decrease of 0.5% or more at the last visit comparing to baseline.

  4. Change in the Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Last Visit From Baseline

    Time frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Change in the Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.

  5. Change in the Body Weight at Last Visit From Baseline

    Time frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Change in the body weight at Last Visit from baseline was reported.

  6. Change in the Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Last Visit From Baseline

    Time frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Change in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.

  7. Change in the Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Last Visit From Baseline

    Time frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Change in the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.

  8. Number of Participants Per Final Effectiveness Assessment Category at Last Visit

    Time frame: At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

    Number of participants per final effectiveness assessment category at Last Visit was reported. The final effectiveness consisted of 4 categories: Improved (If determined as there was any effect of maintaining or improving disease related factors.), Unchanged (If disease related factors had not been changed compared with before administration, and not determined as there was any effect of maintaining symptoms.), Aggravated (If disease related factors were worse than before administration.), and Unassessable (If it cannot be determined due to insufficient information collected.).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Regulatory Requirement Non Interventional Study to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of JARDIANCE DUO® (Empagliflozin/Metformin, 5/500mg, 5/850mg, 5/1000mg, 12.5/500mg, 12.5/850mg, 12.5/1000mg) in Korean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Aug 22, 2018
Registry last updated
May 21, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.