Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00700258

Registry For Temsirolimus, Sunitinib, And Axitinib Treated Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), And Gastro-Intestinal Stroma Tumor (GIST) [STAR-TOR]

The purpose of this registry is to obtain a general view as regards efficacy, tolerability and safety issues of the Torisel®, Sutent®, and/or Inlyta® therapies in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, recurrent / refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and gastro-intestinal stroma tumors (GIST) under the conditions of routine use

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Treatment of the metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has experienced fundamental changes within a very short period of time. In the past few years, introduction of various new substances for the treatment of mRCC has therefore resulted in new scientific research questions. Temsirolimus and sunitinib are current standard therapies in the first-line treatment of mRCC. Inlyta® is a new substance that was developed for the treatment of mRCC after failure of sunitinib or cytokines.

Since August 2009, Torisel® is available as another treatment option for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In addition, Sutent® is used for patients with non-resectable / metastatic gastro-intestinal stroma tumors (GIST) after failure or intolerability of imatinib.

The routine use of drugs in the usual clinical setting faces additional challenges that generally cannot be completely reflected by clinical trials. Therefore, the purpose of this registry is to obtain a general view as regards efficacy, tolerability and safety issues of the Torisel®, Sutent®, and/or Inlyta® therapies in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, recurrent / refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and gastro-intestinal stroma tumors (GIST) under the conditions of routine use.

Therefore, the following information is of particular interest in the course of the investigation:

  • Efficacy (best response, overall survival, progression-free survival)
  • Tolerability of the therapy (assessed by the physician)
  • Safety profile (overall incidence of adverse events as well as side-effect rate) of subjects with mRCC, rMCL, and GIST under treatment with Torisel®, Sutent®, and/or Inlyta®
  • Profile, comorbidities, and characteristics of subjects treated with Torisel® Sutent®, and/or Inlyta®
  • The sequence of using the systemic therapies for RCC, MCL, and GIST
  • Patient survey on the quality of life of mRCC patients

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with proven tumor of RCC, MCL or GIST by histology.
  • Informed consent signed by patient.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

temsirolimus

Drug

Non-interventional study. Treatment decision already made before inclusion into the registry.

Sunitinib

Drug

Non-interventional study. Treatment decision already made before inclusion into the registry.

Axitinib

Drug

Non-interventional study. Treatment decision already made before inclusion into the registry.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    OS was defined as the time from initiation of treatment to death from any cause. In case a death was documented, but date of death was unknown, the date of death was substituted with the latest available date for the participant (last visit, last contact date, date of assessment). If no death was documented, participant was censored with the latest available contact date or assessment date within study. If these rules led to a missing duration or a negative duration, duration was set to maximum of (PFS,"1 day"). Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as time from initiation of treatment to documented disease progression or death from any cause. progression was defined as the enlargement of the measured sum by 20% or one or more new lesions. This outcome measure was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

  2. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    PFS was defined as time from initiation of treatment to documented disease progression or death from any cause. The presence of a progression i.e. enlargement of the measured sum by 20% or one or more new lesions was confirmed, but (a) No date was documented: the date of last intake of study medication was used as date of progression, otherwise the date of the last visit with a documented "non-progression" was used as date of progression. (b) Dates within a visit and on final documentation were contradictory, the prior date was used. In case a death was documented within survival follow-up, but no progression was documented within regular study, the date of last visit plus 1 day was used as date of progression. In case no progression was documented, participant was censored with the latest available contact date or assessment date within study. In case these rules led to a missing duration or a negative duration, duration was set to "1 day". Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

  3. Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    BOR included Complete Remission (CR): complete disappearance of all lesions. Partial Remission (PR): Reduction of the measured total by at least 30%. Minor remission (MR): ≥10% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions but not a PR (<30%). Stable Disease (SD): neither shrinkage for CR/PR nor increase for progressive disease (PD) taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters (SLDs) since treatment start. PD: Enlargement of the measured sum by 20% or one or more new lesions. In this outcome measure, number of participants with best overall response were reported.

  4. Number of Participants Categorized According to Physician's Global Assessment of Effectiveness

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    In this outcome measure, number of participants were categorized according to physician's global assessment of effectiveness as very good, good, moderate, insufficient and missing. Categories were determined by investigator's discretion.

  5. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    Karnofsky performance score was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks.

  6. Number of Participants Classified According to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status for Mantle Cell Lymphoma

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    ECOG: participant's performance status was measured on a 6-point scale: 0= fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light and sedentary nature; 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care, but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50 percent (%) of waking hours; 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4= completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair: 5= dead. In this outcome measure, data for ECOG status (0, 1, 2) and missing was evaluated for MCL as planned.

  7. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    An adverse event (AE) was any undesirable medical event in a participant took a medicinal product. It was not necessarily required that the event is causally related to the treatment or use of the medicinal product. An SAE was any undesirable medical event that occurred in a participant received a medicinal product or dietary supplement (including infant formula) at any dose, and that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required an unforeseen hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial impairment of the ability to perform daily activities); resulted in a congenital malformation/birth defect. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to last documented follow-up visit that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included serious and all non-serious adverse events.

  8. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    An AE was any undesirable medical event in a participant took a medicinal product. It was not necessarily required that the event is causally related to the treatment or use of the medicinal product. In this outcome measure number of participants who discontinued treatment due to adverse events were reported.

  9. Number of Participants Categorized According to Physician's Global Tolerability Assessment

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, approximately 13 years and 10 months

    In this outcome measure, number of participants were categorized according to physician's global tolerability assessment as very good, good, moderate, insufficient and missing. Categories were determined by investigator's discretion.

  10. Absolute Laboratory Values of Hematology Parameters: Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils and Hematocrit

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  11. Absolute Laboratory Values of Hematology Parameters: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  12. Absolute Laboratory Values of Hematology Parameters: Hemoglobin

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  13. Absolute Laboratory Values of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Sodium, Potassium, Phosphate, Magnesium, Cholesterol, Triglycerides and Glucose

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  14. Absolute Laboratory Values of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Creatinine, Total Bilirubin

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  15. Absolute Laboratory Values of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Aspartate Transaminase (AST), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  16. Absolute Laboratory Values of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Albumin

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  17. Absolute Laboratory Values of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Triiodothyronine (fT3) and Free Thyroxine (fT4)

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

  18. Absolute Laboratory Values of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)

    Time frame: Week 46 up to Week 55 post study inclusion

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

STAR-TOR- REGISTRY FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND EFFICACY OF TEMSIROLIMUS (TORISEL), SUNITINIB (SUTENT) AND AXITINIB (INLYTA) FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUBJECTS WITH ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (MRCC), MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA (MCL) AND GASTRO-INTESTINAL STROMA TUMOR (GIST).

Acronym: STAR-TOR

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jun 18, 2008
Registry last updated
Sep 23, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.