Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01000675

Registry for Study of Coils in Intracranial Aneurysms

The current proposal describes a post-market, clinical registry of HydroSoft, aimed at gaining robust clinical data in a large set of patients to better define the advantages, and potentially, the disadvantages of the HydroSoft, and to inform future randomized trials.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

About this study

Aim 1. (Primary Outcome) To test the hypothesis that HydroSoft coils lead to diminished rates of aneurysm recurrence relative to bare platinum coils. In order to test this hypothesis, we will compare recanalization or recurrence rates observed in this prospective registry of HydroSoft coils used as finishing coils to historical series of aneurysms treated with bare platinum coils. This registry is designed to achieve 80% power to detect a minimally clinically relevant difference in rates of recurrence between HydroSoft-treated aneurysms compared with bare platinum coils. Based on recent, prospective, randomized trials assessing both bare platinum coils and hydrogel-bearing coils with 25% and 15% recurrence rates, respectively, we predict a recurrence rate of 18% for HydroSoft treated aneurysms. Typically, a "minimally clinically relevant difference" is on the order of a 30% diminution in a given undesirable outcome. As such, the registry is well powered to detect this minimally clinically relevant difference (18% expected recurrence rate for HydroSoft treated coils versus 25% for the historical control group).

Aim 2. (Secondary Outcome 1) To test the hypothesis that the HydroSoft embolic coil can be placed reliably in intracranial, saccular aneurysms, even late in the embolization procedure. Success of this aim is defined as ease of placement of the HydroSoft device, without need for coil removal and subsequent "finishing" with a bare platinum coil.

Aim 3. (Secondary Outcome 2) To test the hypothesis that use of the HydroSoft embolic coil is associated with risks of thromboembolism similar to that with other coil types, on the order of 3-5% or less.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient presenting with a ruptured or un-ruptured cerebral aneurysm appropriate for endovascular treatment as determined by the neurovascular team (neurosurgeon/neurointerventionist)
  • Patient age: patients aged between 21 and 90 years will be eligible.
  • Patient HUNT AND HESS Grade 0-3.
  • Patient has given fully informed consent to endovascular coiling procedure or if patient cannot consent for themselves, appropriate written consent has been sought from their next of kin, or from appropriate power of attorney.
  • Aneurysm 3-15mm in maximum diameter.
  • Patient is willing and able to return for follow up angiography or MRA between 6-18 months.
  • The patient has not been previously entered into this registry
  • The aneurysm has not previously been treated (by coiling or clipping).

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to obtain informed consent.
  • Medical or surgical comorbidity such that the patient's life expectancy is less than 1 year.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. We will compare recanalization or recurrence rates observed in this prospective registry of HydroSoft coils used as finishing coils to historical series of aneurysms treated with bare platinum coils.

    Time frame: 6 - 18 months post coiling

Secondary outcomes

  1. HydroSoft embolic coil can be placed reliably in intracranial, saccular aneurysms, even late in the embolization procedure.

    Time frame: 6 - 18 months post coiling

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Collaborators

  • Abbott
  • Albany Medical College
  • Asan Medical Center
  • Baylor University
  • Bronson Methodist Hospital
  • Capital Health, Canada
  • Dalhousie University
  • Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center
  • Fudan University
  • JFK Medical Center, Florida
  • Kobe City Medical Center
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Methodist Research Institute, Indianapolis
  • Providence Health & Services
  • Royal University Hospital Foundation
  • Scott and White Hospital & Clinic
  • Stony Brook University
  • The Cleveland Clinic
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of Florida
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Oklahoma
  • University of Southern California
  • Washington University School of Medicine

Registry information

Official study title

Gaining Efficacy Long Term: Hydrosoft, an Emerging, New, Embolic Coil (Gel-the-nec)

Acronym: Gel-the-nec

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 23, 2009
Registry last updated
Jun 6, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.