University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
NCT Number: NCT03786822
This is a multi-site, randomized, investigator-initiated pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of investigational techniques to reduce fluoroscopy time or radiation dose and the amount of radio opaque contrast used during a cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation procedure for atrial fibrillation.
One group of subjects will have the procedure performed with intracardiac echo maneuvers to assess cryoballoon occlusion of the pulmonary vein and will be compared to a group of subjects who will receive the standard medical treatment with fluoroscopy and angiography.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Surgical and catheter based technologies target triggers that initiate atrial fibrillation located in the pulmonary veins (PV). In order to isolate these triggers, radiofrequency energy or freezing is used to destroy the atrial tissue which propagate electrical impulses into and out of the pulmonary veins (PV), to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Use of a patented cryoballoon catheter (Medtronic) to perform PVI has been shown to be safe and efficacious under fluoroscopic guidance with contrast angiography. The objective of this study is to identify methods to reduce radiation dose and radio opaque contrast use while maintaining PVI efficacy and safety.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A 28-mm cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance™ Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) will be employed. The cryoballoon catheter will be introduced into the left atrium, following a single transeptal puncture, through a 12 French steerable sheath (FlexCath, Medtronic), constantly flushed with heparinized saline. A circular mapping catheter (Achieve, Medtronic) will be advanced through the cryoballoon to the PV orifice and positioned as proximally as possible inside the vessel to record the PV potentials at baseline and monitor the isolation procedure in real time.
Other names: Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Time frame: one year
change in the composite endpoint of total fluoroscopy time (min)
Time frame: one year
change in the composite endpoint of contrast (cc)
Time frame: one year
•recurrence of atrial fibrillation after 1 month blanking period measured by ECG event monitoring at 6 and 12 month follow up (time to first recurrence in months, total number of episodes, and total duration in hours)
Time frame: one year
•cryoballoon procedure time (min)
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05164718
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Drammen, Norway
View Trial Details