Region Vasterbotten, Skelleftea Sjukhus, Dialysen
Skellefteå, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT06168539
During hemodialysis (HD) the blood of the patient pass an extracorporeal circuit that contains a dialyzer for rinsing and a venous chamber (air trap) to prevent from air embolism through the return blood into the patient. However, air traps in clinical use have limited capacity to prevent from microemboli of air to enter the return bloodline and deposit as emboli in the body such as lungs, heart and brain. The Investigator developed the air trap Emboless that was patented. In vitro studies showed significantly better reduction of microemboli contaminations than air traps compared to that in clinical use.
The present randomized clinical trial compares two different air traps used by the same patients in a cross-over design (as pairs) using the Emboless compared with the Fresenius 4008/5008 (F5008).
Chronic HD patients are randomized to perform the first HD with either their standard air trap (F5008) in the venous bloodline tubing or using the Emboless bloodline and vice versa. Each patient was included to make two paired series. A safety committee evaluates if significantly worse outcome appears especially with the Emboless, to stop the study.
During HD the microbubbles are counted by a GAMPT ultrasound device using two probes. One probe is set at the inlet side of the air trap and the second at the outlet side. The outlet side represents data of microbubbles in the blood that are entering into the patient. Comparative non-parametric paired analyses are performed between the air traps.
Monitoring of the study is performed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Skellefteå, Sweden
During hemodialysis (HD) the blood of the patient pass an extracorporeal circuit that contains a dialyzer for rinsing and a venous chamber (air trap) to prevent from air embolism through the return blood into the patient. However, air traps in clinical use have limited capacity to prevent from microemboli of air to enter the return bloodline and deposit as emboli in the body such as lungs, heart and brain. The Investigator developed the air trap Emboless that was patented in Europe, USA and India. In vitro studies showed significantly better reduction of microemboli contaminations than air traps compared to that in clinical use.
The present randomized clinical trial compares two different air traps used by the same patients in a cross-over design (as pairs) using the Emboless compared with the Fresenius 4008/5008 (F5008).
Chronic HD patients are randomized to perform the first HD with either their standard air trap (F5008) in the venous bloodline tubing or using the Emboless bloodline and vice versa. Each patient is included to make two paired series. A maximum of 30 patients are planned. Each with 2 series of each two different sets of air traps that would give a total of 120 dialyses. A safety committee evaluates if significantly worse outcome appears especially with the Emboless.
During HD the microbubbles are counted by a GAMPT ultrasound device using two probes. One probe is set at the inlet side of the air trap and the second at the outlet side. The outlet side represents data of microbubbles in the blood that are entering into the patient. Comparative non-parametric paired analyses are performed between the air traps.
Monitoring of the study is performed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Accepted are all patients performing chronic HD due to End Stage renal disease of any reason:
Exclusion criteria
Patients that are expected not to fulfil a whole series of two dialysis within the study such as those:
Home-haemodialysis treatments and self-care dialysis treatments are not included in the study. If such patient accepts to participate in the study, he/she has to adapt to study criteria (assisted treatment).
Emboless has the US patent number 8894749 is compared to standard dialysis See also reference Jonsson et al 2023 referred to in the main text.
Standard dialysis set is used as comparative
Time frame: 1 year
Numbers of air micro bubbles (diameter sizes from 20-500µm diameter) are counted at inlet and outlet of the air trap with parallel probes using ultrasound GAMPT 200 device during 30minutes of HD. A calculation clarifies change in percentage of outlet versus inlet amount/size of microbubble air return into the return bloodline that is connected to the return needle placed in the vein of the patient. The size in diameter and numbers within the dialysis time/30 minutes of HD are given.
Time frame: 1 year
The Investigator aims to compare the microbubble reduction of the air traps also between the hemodialysis versus hemodiafiltration if the specific patient performs this dialysis under normal circumstances.
Time frame: 1 year
If a patient experience adverse events these will be reported
Umeå University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05297786
Hemodialysis Complication, Hypotension of Hemodialysis
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06866470
Exercise Addiction, Hemodialysis Complication
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06573567
Hemodialysis Complication
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07390604
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Metz, France
View Trial Details