VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
West Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States
NCT Number: NCT01639443
In this research study, investigators use colonoscopy as a case example to evaluate a predictive overbooking model derived using patient-level predictors of absenteeism. The no-show overbooking intervention employs a logistic regression model that uses patient data to predict the odds of no-showing with 80% accuracy. These projected no-show appointments will be overbooked by clerks for patients who agree to join a "fast track" short-call line. By rapidly processing endoscopy patients and moving them out of traditional slots, investigators predict more scheduling slots would become available for patients awaiting colonoscopy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
West Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States
Patient "no-shows" are especially common in VA gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy units, where both open-access endoscopy scheduling and patient dislike of procedures contribute to high absenteeism. In this proposal, investigators use endoscopy as a case example to evaluate a predictive overbooking model derived using patient-level predictors of absenteeism. The no-show overbooking intervention employs a logistic regression model that uses patient data to predict the odds of no-showing with 80% accuracy. These projected no-show appointments will be overbooked by clerks for patients who agree to join a "fast track" short-call line. However, patients scheduled for upper endoscopies in the "fast track" assume a small risk of service denial on the day of their overbooking in case of inaccurate predictions. If this occurs, the patient is guaranteed service in the next available position and is assured of having a shorter wait time. Patients scheduled for colonoscopies will never be turned down but may experience delays in the waiting room the day of their "fast track" appointment. By rapidly processing endoscopy patients and moving them out of traditional slots, investigators predict more scheduling slots would become available for patients awaiting colonoscopy. Investigators propose to conduct a prospective, 24-month, interrupted time series (ITS) trial in the WLAVA (West Los Angeles Veterans Administration) GI clinic endoscopy unit. During intervention periods, investigators will activate the no-show predictive overbooking strategy described above. Investigators will compare outcomes between scheduling strategies, including differences in percent utilization of capacity (primary outcome), number of Veterans served, mean patient lag time between scheduling and procedure, number of unexpected service denials ("bumps") from no-show predictive overbooking, and direct costs of care. Investigators will analyze differences using both traditional univariate and multivariate approaches, and using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) analyses to adjust for auto-correlations in ITS data.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
During intervention period, every Veteran scheduled for an endoscopy will be offered "fast-track" offer, which gives them a chance to get their endoscopy procedure done earlier than usual scheduling by overbooking their appointment in a predictive no-show slot.
Time frame: After 12 months of running study in clinic
Investigators' primary objective will be to evaluate the impact of no-show predictive overbooking on percentage of the GI endoscopy clinic that are filled on a given day. Days where at least one Fast-tracked patient attended an appointment were compared to days where only Control patients attended appointments. Percentage of GI Clinic Capacity is calculated as the number of appointments completed divided by number of appointment spots available on a given day. This percentage was compared between Fast-tracked days and Control days, using data from 1672 patients.
Time frame: After 12 months of running study in clinic
The investigators will calculate the mean daily lag time for all colonoscopy and upper endoscopies performed per day
Time frame: After 12 months of running study in clinic
The investigators will compare the number of patients bumped per day between scheduling approaches
Time frame: After 20 months of running study in clinic
The investigators will compare daily advanced adenomatous polyp detection and daily cecal intubation rates between groups.
Time frame: After 12 months of running study in clinic
Length of Workday in hours (comparing days with Fast-Tracked Appointments to Control days without)
Time frame: After 12 months of running study in clinic
For cost comparisons, the investigators will aggregate total provider overtime costs for colonoscopies performed. Cost is reported per day.
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
Acronym: No-show
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02937506
Behavior, Colon Cancer
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00572143
Behavior, Colon Cancer
Tromsø, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT07736131
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT05513742
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details