Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal
Pokhara, Gandaki, Nepal
NCT Number: NCT04282915
A growing number of trials have demonstrated treatment effectiveness for mental illness by non-specialist providers, such as primary care providers, in low-resource settings. A barrier to scaling up these evidence-based practices is the limited uptake from trainings into service provision and lack of fidelity to evidence-based practices among non-specialists. This arises, in part, from stigma among non-specialists against people with mental illness. Therefore, interventions are needed to address attitudes among non- specialists. To address this gap, REducing Stigma among HeAlthcare Providers to improvE Mental Health services (RESHAPE), is an intervention for non-specialists in which social contact with persons with mental illness is added to training and supervision programs. A cluster randomized control trial will address primary objectives including changes in stigma (Social Distance Scale) and improved quality of mental health services, operationalized as accuracy of identifying patients with mental illness in primary care. The control condition is existing mental health training and supervision for non-specialists delivered through the Nepal Ministry of Health's adaptation of the World Health Organization mental health Gap Action Programme. The intervention condition will incorporate social contact with people with mental illness into existing training and supervision. Participants in the cluster randomized control trial will be the direct beneficiaries of training and supervision (primary care providers) and indirect beneficiaries (their patients). Primary care workers' outcomes include stigma (Social Distance Scale), knowledge (mental health Gap Action Programme knowledge scale), implicit attitudes (Implicit Association Test), clinical self-efficacy (mental health Gap Action Programme knowledge scale), and clinical competence (Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors) to be assessed pre-training, post-training, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Accuracy of diagnoses will be determined through the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version 5, which will be assessed at 3 months after patient enrollment. Patient outcomes include functioning, quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, medication side effects, barriers to care, and cost of care assessed at enrollment and 3 and 6 months. This study will inform decisions regarding inclusion of persons living with mental illness in training primary care providers.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pokhara, Gandaki, Nepal
There continues to be a major gap between the global burden of persons with mental illness and the number of patients receiving adequate treatment. In the U.S. and other high-income countries, approximately 1 out of 5 persons receives minimally adequate care. In lower-middle income countries, it ranges from 1 out of 27 to 1 out of 100 persons. To address this gap in low- and middle-income countries, a key strategy has been the use of primary care health workers to detect and deliver of care for mental illness. The World Health Organization has developed the mental health Gap Action Programme to train primary care workers to detect mental illness and deliver evidence-supported treatment. However, research to date suggests that implementation strategies for mental health Gap Action Programme are inadequate as evidenced by low detection rates. In Nepal, fewer than half of persons with mental illness were correctly identified by mental health Gap Action Programme-trained primary care workers. A potential barrier to effective implementation of primary care detection is stigma among primary care workers against persons with mental illness.
Our preliminary work suggests that reducing primary care workers' stigma against persons with mental illness may improve accurate detection of mental illness. A version of the mental health Gap Action Programme training that includes a stigma reduction component was developed: REducing Stigma among HealthcAre ProvidErs (RESHAPE). In RESHAPE, persons with mental illness (i.e., service users) are trained to share recovery stories, conduct myth-busting sessions, and promote mental health advocacy. A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Nepal comparing standard mental health Gap Action Programme training delivered psychiatrists and psychosocial specialists with a mental health Gap Action Programme training delivered by both specialists and service users (RESHAPE). Consistent with high-income country literature demonstrating that interaction with service users reduces stigma more effectively that only providing knowledge, stigma was lower among the RESHAPE- arm trained health workers. The pilot results also suggest that reducing stigma may improve detection of mental illness. Therefore, involvement of mental health service users in training primary care workers may reduce stigma, and that stigma reduction may mediate improved detection of mental illness. If these findings are confirmed in an appropriately powered cluster randomized controlled trial, this service user collaborative implementation strategy could make a major contribution to improving primary care detection in low- and middle-income countries, as well as in the U.S. A hybrid implementation-effectiveness (type-3) cluster randomized controlled trial will be in Nepal comparing mental health Gap Action Programme standard implementation with the RESHAPE implementation strategy. Our team of U.S. and Nepali researchers, in partnership with the Nepal Ministry of Health, demonstrated the feasibility of the cluster randomized controlled trial design and identified strategies for cost effectiveness modeling. Target conditions will be depressive disorder, psychotic disorders, and alcohol use disorder.
Aim 1 - To evaluate the impact of the RESHAPE service user engagement on stigma among primary care workers. Hypothesis: Primary care workers in the RESHAPE arm will have less stigma toward persons with mental illness (measured with the Social Distance Scale) 3 months after training compared with primary care workers in the standard training.
Aim 2 - To evaluate the impact of the RESHAPE training on accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of detection, as measured by the proportion of true positive and true negative diagnoses among patients presenting to primary care facilities, as confirmed by a psychiatrist's structured clinical interview; and to evaluate stigma as a mediator of differences in accuracy. Hypothesis: Primary care workers in the RESHAPE arm will have greater accuracy of detecting mental illness. Secondary analyses: implementation arm differences in patient quality adjusted life years and cost utility will be evaluated.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
**Primary Care Providers**
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
**Patients**
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mental health service users are trained using Photo Voice to develop recovery story testimonials. They then participate in primary care providers mental health Gap Action Programme training. In addition, aspirational figures are trained to provider testimonials and conduct myth-busting.
The mental health Gap Action Programme is a training program for primary care providers in mental health services. The curriculum has been developed by the World Health Organization and was adapted in Nepal and certified by the Ministry of Health.
Time frame: 6 months post training
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time frame: 3-months post-patient enrollment
Accuracy of clinical decision making (this a diagnostic tool, there are no maximum or minimum scores, the objective is to determine if an appropriate diagnosis is selected that will lead to appropriate management)
Time frame: 6 months post-training
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Time frame: 3 months post-training
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Time frame: immediately after the training
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Time frame: 6-months post-training
Self-reported clinical efficacy for mental health services, minimum = 0; maximum = 5, higher score is better outcome
Time frame: 3-months post-training
Self-reported clinical efficacy for mental health services, minimum = 0; maximum = 5, higher score is better outcome
Time frame: immediately after the training
Self-reported clinical efficacy for mental health services, minimum = 0; maximum = 5, higher score is better outcome
Time frame: 6-months post-training
Computer-based neuropsychological assessment of implicit bias related to mental illness, there is no maximum or minimum score, score is D-score based on comparison of timing; positive scores equal more bias
Time frame: 3-months post-training
Computer-based neuropsychological assessment of implicit bias related to mental illness, there is no maximum or minimum score, score is D-score based on comparison of timing; positive scores equal more bias
Time frame: immediately after the training
Computer-based neuropsychological assessment of implicit bias related to mental illness, there is no maximum or minimum score, score is D-score based on comparison of timing; positive scores equal more bias
Time frame: 6 months post-training
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Time frame: 3 months post-training
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Time frame: immediately after the training
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Time frame: 3 months post training
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time frame: immediately after the training
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time frame: 6-months post enrollment
Assessment of daily functioning, minimum = 12, maximum = 60; higher score is worse
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Assessment of daily functioning, minimum = 12, maximum = 60; higher score is worse
Time frame: 6-months post enrollment
Depression symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 27, higher score is worse
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Depression symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 27, higher score is worse
Time frame: 6 months post enrollment
Anxiety symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 21, higher score is worse
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Anxiety symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 21, higher score is worse
Time frame: 6 months post enrollment
Psychosis symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
Time frame: 3 months post enrollment
Psychosis symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
Time frame: 6-months post enrollment
Alcohol Use Disorder symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 40, higher score is worse
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Alcohol Use Disorder symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 40, higher score is worse
Time frame: 6-months post enrollment
Quality of life symptoms, minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Quality of life symptoms, minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
Time frame: 6-months post-enrollment
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total costs
Time frame: 3-months post-enrollment
Costs of care to patients, , there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total costs
Time frame: 6-months post-enrollment
Common factors use by primary care provider, minimum score = 0, maximum = 15, higher score is better
George Washington University
Other
Reducing Stigma Among Healthcare Providers to Improve Mental Health Services: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (RESHAPE-cRCT)
Acronym: RESHAPE-cRCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04893447
Adolescent, Adult
Boise, Idaho, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04284813
Alcohol, Alcohol Use Disorder
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06929533
Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR), Anxiety Disorders
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06885489
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Anxiety
Erzurum, Ağrı, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details