Deprescribing opportunities
OtherAn electronic intervention that identifies potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and generates instructions for safe discontinuation, which is presented to the treating physician for their consideration.
NCT Number: NCT03272607
Reducing medications and associated side effects in older adults: an electronic hospital-based intervention
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Polypharmacy, or the concomitant use of 5 drugs or more, is a serious health concern and affects more than half of Canadians aged 65 years and older. It is the number one identifiable risk factor for adverse drug events (ADEs), which are responsible for 27,000 hospital admissions annually in Canada and up to 20% of return visits to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Many ADEs are preventable or ameliorable through interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing.
MedSafer, the intervention software, applies an electronic set of criteria, previously designed and piloted on one thousand (1000) hospitalized patients by a group of Quebec and Ontario internists, geriatricians, palliative care doctors and pharmacists, to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in the hospitalized elderly and generate instructions for the patient and physician for safe discontinuation. The current study seeks to partially automate the deprescribing process and to demonstrate the efficacy of this type of intervention on adverse drug events at 30-days post hospital discharge.
At the time of hospitalization, the patient's medications, co-morbidities, and a measure of frailty will be entered into the MedSafer software which will output an individualized and prioritized deprescription plan for the most responsible physician's consideration. Any subsequent medication changes will be transmitted to relevant community physicians. The study will evaluate the impact of stopping PIMs on the occurrence of ADEs within 30 days of discharge, as compared to usual care.
This study will take place on the clinical teaching units (CTUs) at 11 hospitals from seven university hospital centres across Canada. Based on historical data, the investigators estimate a combined 5200 eligible patients per year with nearly 50% taking ten or more medications. Many will have multiple medical co-morbidities such as diabetes, heart disease, and renal insufficiency. A large portion will meet criteria for geriatric syndromes such as frailty and will be at high risk for the development of delirium, falls and functional decline. This population is ideal for a generalizable deprescribing study.
All patients aged 65 or older who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled. A trained research assistant will identify eligible patients and medications will be screened using MedSafer. A deprescribing plan will be generated for the CTU team containing the rationale for suggested medication changes and strategies for safe and successful deprescription. The CTU team will then decide, in conjunction with the patient/proxy and relevant consultants, whether to apply the suggested modifications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients discharged from non-study units will be excluded unless that unit is a transitional care, rehabilitation, or post-acute care unit which bridges the gap between acute medical hospitalization and community services.
An electronic intervention that identifies potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and generates instructions for safe discontinuation, which is presented to the treating physician for their consideration.
Time frame: Interview performed 30-35 days post-discharge.
Post-discharge telephone interview performed by trained personnel using a modification of the Australian two-step adverse reaction and drug event report.
Two trained and blinded clinician reviewers will independently use the Leape and Bates approach to assess whether an ADE was present (yes/no) and if so what was the nature of the injury resulting from it using a four-point Likert scale (definitely preventable, probably preventable, probably not preventable, and definitely not preventable), and assess the probability that an event was attributable to a specific drug that was newly started, changed or continued during hospitalization. In cases of disagreement, a third trained and blinded clinician will review and determine the final assessment.
Time frame: At hospital discharge and at 30-days post hospital discharge
The absolute number of potentially inappropriate medications at discharge among patients who were identified as having a potentially inappropriate medication at admission and for who a deprescribing opportunity was generated and presented to the treating team
Time frame: 30-days post hospital discharge
Death following hospital discharge
Time frame: At hospital discharge
Proportion of participants with one or more potentially inappropriate medications deprescribed at discharge between intervention and control
Time frame: 30 days post hospital discharge
Quality of sleep measured by the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 4a measured pre- and post-hospitalization compared between intervention and control
Time frame: 30 days post hospital discharge
The proportion of patients who had one or more adverse events (falls, hospitalization, death, unplanned encounter with the healthcare system
Time frame: 30 days post hospital
The proportion of patients with one or more self-reported falls post hospital discharge
Time frame: At 30-days post hospital discharge
Quality of life as measured by EQ5D-5L and reported based on reported Canadian time trade-off values (from 0-1 with higher equal to better quality of life)
Time frame: 30-days post hospital discharge
Proportion of patients who died post-hospital discharge compared between the intervention and control groups
Time frame: 30-days post hospital discharge
Proportion of patients with any self-reported unplanned visit with the healthcare system compared between intervention and control (emergency room visits and hospitalizations)
Time frame: At 30-days post discharge
Total number of mediations at 30 days (reported as median and interquartile range) compared between intervention and control
Time frame: At 30-days post hospital discharge
Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse drug events as defined by 4 or more on the 6-point Leape and Bates Likert scale
Time frame: 30-days post hospital discharge
Proportion of potentially inappropriate medications that remained stopped between intervention and control
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05157191
Adverse Drug Event, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04181775
Adverse Drug Event, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06120712
Adverse Drug Event, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05417750
Advanced Solid Tumor, Adverse Drug Event
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details