Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04890990

Reducing Depression-related Stigma and Increasing-treatment Seeking Among Black Adolescents

The purposes of this study are to:

1. test among adolescent the utility of brief video-based interventions to reduce stigma-related attitudes and increase help-seeking intentions toward depression; 2. examine the role of race (Black vs other) as an independent factor in the primary outcome.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

14 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Yale Child Study Center

New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States

About this study

Intervention videos will each be of ~120-second duration and feature an underage female professional (age 16) acting as a simulated patient. All three videos will focus on her as an empowered presenter with depression sharing her personal story regarding depression and describe how social supports from family, friends, and community, as well as professional help assisted her in overcoming symptoms of the illness.

Assessments will occur at baseline and post-intervention, and will include:

  • Demographics (baseline only);
  • Primary outcome: Depression-related stigma(Depression Stigma Scale [DSS]) summary score.
  • Secondary outcomes: a. DSS individual items; b. Help-seeking (General Help-Seeking Questionnaire [GHSQ]) summary score and individual items; and bc Racial attitudes: feelings thermometers.

The investigators intend to randomly assign ~1,000 individuals aged 14-18 as follows:

Subjects oversampled for Black participants (50% Black; 50% other);

Randomized, in equal proportions, and stratified by race, to view one of three ~120-second videos of a girl with:

  • No depression control (Black; BC);
  • Depression (Black, following same script as in our earlier study (Amsalem and Martin, 2021), DB); and
  • Depression adjusted (Black, with script adjusted based on input from focus group of Black girls and women; DBa).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • English-speaking
  • Living in the US
  • Ages 14 - 18

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Short videos

Behavioral

Intervention videos will each be of 90-second duration and feature two underage professionals (ages 16) acting as a simulated patient. All videos will focus on an empowered presenter with depression sharing her personal story regarding depression and describe how social supports from family, friends, and community, as well as professional help assisted her in overcoming symptoms of the illness. The actors will include a Black girl and a white girl.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Depression-related stigma (Depression Stigma Scale [DSS]; Personal component only): TOTAL SCORE

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    The DSS (Christensen, Jorm, Evans, & Groves, 2004) is a self-report instrument composed of two 9-item subscales. The first subscale measures the participants' own/ personal attitudes, and the second measures participants' beliefs about the attitudes of others ('Depression is sign of weakness' vs. 'Most people believe that depression is a sign of weakness'). We will use the Personal subscale (DSS-Personal) in this study. The DSS has a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The total score comprises the sum of its item scores, and a higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome). The DSS-Personal subscale has shown adequate psychometric properties: 0.71 test-retest reliability, 0.76 internal consistency (Griffiths et al., 2004). In our earlier study (Amsalem and Martin, 2021), Cronbach's a was .83.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Help-seeking (General Help-Seeking Questionnaire [GHSQ]; Emotional and Suicide components): MEAN SCORE

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    The General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ) (Wilson, Deane, Marshall, & Dalley, 2008) was developed to measure help-seeking intentions from different sources (friend, parent, mental health professional, and others) and is divided into personal-emotional problems and suicidal thoughts (Ibrahim et al., 2019). The instrument consists of 10 items for each part, measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). One question is stated as 'I would not seek help from anyone' and is reverse-scored. Higher scores on this scale indicate more help seeking (better outcome). The GHSQ has shown good psychometric properties: Cronbach's alpha = .70 and test-retest of .86 for personal-emotional problems, and Cronbach's alpha = .83 and test-retest of .88 for suicidal thoughts.

  2. Change in Racial attitudes: feelings thermometer

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    We will use a feelings thermometer, modeled after Norton and Herek, 2013:

    "Using a scale from zero to 100, please tell us your personal feelings toward each of the following groups of friends, teachers, or colleagues. As you do this task, think of an imaginary thermometer. The warmer or more favorable you feel toward the group, the higher the number you should give it. The colder or less favorable you feel, the lower the number. If you feel neither warm nor cold toward the group, rate it 50." To familiarize respondents with the response format, they will be first presented with thermometers for "Men in general" and "Women in general," with each respondent rating her or his own sex first. Next, they rate racially different groups (white women, white men, Black women, Black men) with the order of presentation randomized. Higher ratings (maximum 100) indicate warmer, more favorable feelings toward the target whereas lower ratings (minimum 0) indicate colder, more negative feelings.

  3. Change in DSS Item 1

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    People with depression could snap out of it if they wanted

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  4. Change in DSS Item 2

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Depression is a sign of personal weakness

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  5. Change in DSS Item 3

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Depression is not a real medical illness

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  6. Change in DSS Item 4

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    People with depression are dangerous

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  7. Change in DSS Item 5

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    It is best to avoid people with depression, so you don't become depressed yourself

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  8. Change in DSS Item 6

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    People with depression are unpredictable

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  9. Change in DSS Item 7

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    If I had depression, I would not tell anyone

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  10. Change in DSS Item 8

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    I would not employ someone if I knew they had been depressed

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  11. Change in DSS Item 9

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    I would not vote for a politician if I knew they had been depressed

    Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).

  12. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 1

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Intimate partner (e.g., girlfriend, boyfriend)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  13. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 2

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Friend (not related to you)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  14. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 3

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Parent

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  15. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 4

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Other relative/family member

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  16. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 5

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist, social worker, counselor)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  17. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 6

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Phone helpline (e.g., lifeline)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  18. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 7

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Doctor/GP

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  19. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 8

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Minister or religious leader (e.g., Priest, Rabbi, Chaplain)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  20. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 9

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    I would not seek help from anyone

    **REVERSE SCORED ITEM** Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). LOWER scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  21. Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 10

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    I would seek help from another not listed above

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  22. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 1

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Intimate partner (e.g., girlfriend, boyfriend)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  23. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 2

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Friend (not related to you)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  24. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 3

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Parent

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  25. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 4

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Other relative/family member

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  26. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 5

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist, social worker, counselor)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  27. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 6

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Phone helpline (e.g., lifeline)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  28. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 7

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Doctor/GP

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  29. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 8

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    Minister or religious leader (e.g., Priest, Rabbi, Chaplain)

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  30. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 9

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    I would not seek help from anyone

    **REVERSE SCORED ITEM** Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). LOWER scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

  31. Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 10

    Time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)

    I would seek help from another not listed above

    Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yale University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
May 18, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 25, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.