The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
NCT Number: NCT02086773
The purpose of this study to determine if a lower hemoglobin transfusion threshold, 7 g/dL, has a safety profile similar to that of the current standard transfusion threshold of 8 g/dL.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is vitally important for the care of patients undergoing myelosuppressive therapy for acute leukemia. The therapeutic approach to this disease involves the use of high doses of chemotherapy to treat the blood cancers and bone marrow disorders; but it damages the marrow and blood system. Malignant and healthy stem cells are affected by the chemotherapy, and even when the malignant cells are killed, it can take weeks for the healthy cells to reconstitute the marrow. At diagnosis and before bone marrow recovery post treatment, RBCs are needed to support the patient. Current practices at major comprehensive cancer centers all utilize liberal hemoglobin transfusions triggers of 8-9 g/dL or higher. Higher hemoglobin levels in these high risk patients may have benefits such as better energy and organ function. However, research in a variety of clinical settings, suggests that a higher hemoglobin transfusion threshold is associated with the same or even higher mortality rates compared to lower hemoglobin thresholds (7-8 g/dL). These other settings include prospective randomized trials in high-risk orthopedic surgery patients, critically ill adult and pediatric ICU patients, acute GI bleed patients, and patients undergoing cardiac surgery. One clinical scenario where the ideal transfusion threshold is unknown is in patients receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. Transfusion requirements and triggers have not been systematically studied in acute leukemia or other cancers. Acute leukemia carries a high mortality; any unnecessary increase in morbidity or mortality is not acceptable. Without a clear benefit of higher transfusion thresholds, the added risks and costs of transfusion may be substantial and unnecessary. The investigators plan to study this issue in this pilot and feasibility study by randomly assigning patients treated for acute leukemia to be transfused with RBCs at either a higher or lower hemoglobin concentration trigger point. In this way, the investigators will be able to accurately determine if there is benefit or harms to having a lower or higher red cell count during the induction treatment and recovery period for patients with acute leukemias. This study will also collect information evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the two transfusion thresholds and the feasibility of expanding the study to a large randomized trial.This safety data will serve as a platform for a larger mortality study in leukemia and possibly additional studies in solid tumors.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: PRBC transfusion, RBC transfusion
Time frame: 60 days
Time frame: 60 days
Overall safety is determined by the total difference between arms for the number of transfusions given per participant
Time frame: 60 days
Overall safety is determined by the total difference between arms for number of participants experiencing neutropenic infections, where neutropenia is defined as absolute neutrophil count < 500/mcL.
Time frame: 60 days
Time frame: 60 days
Time frame: 60 days
Time frame: 60 days
As per protocol-defined criteria, the transfusion strategy being tested would be deemed feasible if all of the following criteria are met: 1) More than 50% of eligible patients could be consented; 2) More than 75% of participants randomized to the low arm tolerated the 7 g/dL transfusion threshold; 3) Fewer than 15% of participants crossed over from the low arm to the high arm; 4) The study was not paused for safety concerns.
Time frame: 60 days
As per protocol-defined criteria, the transfusion strategy being tested would be deemed feasible if all of the following criteria are met: 1) More than 50% of eligible patients could be consented; 2) More than 75% of participants randomized to the low arm tolerated the 7 g/dL transfusion threshold; 3) Fewer than 15% of participants crossed over from the low arm to the high arm; 4) The study was not paused for safety concerns.
Time frame: 60 days
As per protocol-defined criteria, the transfusion strategy being tested would be deemed feasible if all of the following criteria are met: 1) More than 50% of eligible patients could be consented; 2) More than 75% of participants randomized to the low arm tolerated the 7 g/dL transfusion threshold; 3) Fewer than 15% of participants crossed over from the low arm to the high arm; 4) The study was not paused for safety concerns.
Time frame: 60 days
Median number of red cell and platelet transfusions given per participant.
Time frame: 60 days
Number of participants in each arm experiencing neutropenic infections, where neutropenia is defined as absolute neutrophil count < 500/mcL.
Time frame: 60 days
Number of grade 3-4 bleeding events as defined by CTCAE 4.0.
Time frame: 60 days
Median length of inpatient stay in days. This is for the initial inpatient stay for induction chemotherapy only (chemotherapy itself was not part of this protocol).
Time frame: 60 days
Number of deaths attributed to induction chemotherapy.
Time frame: 60 days
Number of participants with at least one grade 3-5 nonhematological toxicity as defined by CTCAE 4.0.
Time frame: 60 days
Number of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < 2. The ECOG scale is rated from 0 to 5, where 0 is best health and 5 is dead.
Time frame: 60 days
Number of participants who crossed over from the low to the high arm due to symptomatic anemia (defined as Hb < 8 g/dL with symptoms).
Time frame: 60 days
Estimated per-patient cost savings of the low transfusion threshold compared to the high transfusion threshold.
Time frame: 60 days
Median difference in fatigue scores as graded on the National Cancer Institute Fatigue Scale. Scores are from 0 to 10, where 0 is no fatigue and 10 is the worst possible fatigue.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Other
Prospective Randomized Clinical Feasibility Study of Red Cell Transfusion Goals in Patients With Acute Leukemias
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03434730
Acute Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05774990
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Hematologic Diseases
Odense, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT01231412
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05972577
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details