Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
NCT Number: NCT05274906
This controlled feeding trial will identify biomarkers in the metabolome and microbiome that may differ when consuming a healthy diet with or without red and processed meat.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
This is a randomized cross-over feeding trial to test whether red and processed meat consumption, in the context of a controlled diet based on HEI-2015, will cause shifts in the metabolome and the microbiome compared to a controlled HEI-2015 diet with no red or processed meat. Twenty healthy adult volunteers will consume two diets in random order: 1) Diet A is based on the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) and includes no red or processed meat; 2) Diet B is based on the Healthy Eating Index-2015 and includes red and processed meat (HEI-2015-M) as some of the protein sources. Both diet periods last 21 days and an approximately 21-day washout period occurs between diets.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) with or without red/processed meat (HEI-2015-M)
Other names: feeding trial, intervention, dietary, HEI-2015
Time frame: Day 21
Plasma aqueous metabolomics were evaluated via Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS). Data are relative concentrations - the concentration of a specified biomarker is relative to the concentration of all other biomarkers. Data are reported as the mean ratio of relative concentration on day 21 compared to day 0 [(relative concentration day 21)/(relative concentration day 0)]. A value above 1.0 indicates that the relative concentration of the metabolite increased from baseline at the end of the diet, whereas a value below 1.0 indicates the relative concentration decreased, and a value of 1.0 indicates no change from baseline.
Time frame: Day 21
Plasma lipid metabolomics were evaluated via Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS). Data are absolute concentrations. Data are reported as the mean ratio of relative concentration on day 21 compared to day 0 [(relative concentration day 21)/(relative concentration day 0)]. A value above 1.0 indicates that the relative concentration of the metabolite increased from baseline at the end of the diet, whereas a value below 1.0 indicates the relative concentration decreased, and a value of 1.0 indicates no change from baseline.
Time frame: Day 21
Effects of the intervention on urine metabolomic biomarkers were evaluated via Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). Urine metabolites are absolute concentrations standardized (as a ratio) to trimethyl-silylpropionic-2,2,3,3-d4 acid sodium salt (TSP). Data are reported as the mean ratio of relative concentration on day 21 compared to day 0 [(relative concentration day 21)/(relative concentration day 0)]. A value above 1.0 indicates that the relative concentration of the metabolite increased from baseline at the end of the diet, whereas a value below 1.0 indicates the relative concentration decreased, and a value of 1.0 indicates no change from baseline.
Time frame: Day 21
Shannon's Diversity Index (SDI) was used as a measure of species diversity, calculated as the sum of -p/ln(p), where p is the proportion of the sample made up of each OTU using the QIIME2 shannon_pd plugin. Sampled 16S rRNA sequences were organized into 'amplicon sequence variants' (ASVs), ASVs were filtered by abundance with a threshold of 1e - 5. This measure is a unitless scale proportion ranging from zero to infinity. Zero indicates a completely homogenous sample, and higher scores indicate greater species diversity.
Time frame: Day 21
Fecal bacterial functional genes were evaluated via digital droplet PCR. Data are reported as the difference between day 21 and day 0 (calculated as day 21 - day 0) of each diet in the relative abundance (calculated as gene counts/16s rRNA gene counts) of fecal bacterial functional genes. A value that is positive indicates that the relative abundance increased from baseline to the end of the diet, whereas a negative value indicates the relative abundance decreased.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06107192
Controlled Feeding Trial, Healthy
College Park, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05890391
Anthropometric Measure, Behavior
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05460650
Alcohol Drinking, Behavior
Manchester, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05690139
Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Body Weight
Famagusta, Cyprus
View Trial Details