NCT Number: NCT07068243
Regional anesthesia techniques (or nerve blocks) are used to provide sensory blockade over the abdominal wall. The most established technique is thoracic epidural. This provides bilateral spread but is also associated with neuraxial complications, which has led to a decrease in clinical usage. The rectus sheath block (RSB) is an established regional anesthesia technique used to provide somatic analgesia to the midline anterior abdominal wall by depositing local anesthetic in the posterior rectus sheath, thereby targeting the terminal anterior branches of the lower thoracic intercostal nerves. The conventional approach involves placing the ultrasound (US) probe transversely across the rectus abdominis muscle and advancing the needle in-plane either lateral-to-medial or medial-to-lateral. While this technique achieves spread within the sheath, the cephalocaudal distribution of local anesthetic may be suboptimal, potentially limiting the extent of dermatomal coverage. A longitudinal probe orientation, with needle insertion from cephalad to caudad, may theoretically facilitate a more extensive cranio-caudal spread by aligning the injection axis with the anatomical fascial plane of the posterior rectus sheath. However, the relative efficacy of these two approaches has not been investigated in a controlled, comparative setting. Thus, this randomized, single-blinded trial aims to evaluate the dermatomal sensory distribution and ultrasound-assessed local anesthetic spread achieved by the transverse versus longitudinal in-plane approaches to ultrasound-guided RSB in healthy adult volunteers. To compare the dermatomal sensory block distribution, investigators will use dermatomal mapping with pinprick, and cold.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
A total of 14-18 adult volunteers will be included. Each participant will receive bilateral rectus sheath blocks at a standardized supraumbilical level. The side receiving the transverse approach (US probe perpendicular to muscle fibers; needle in-plane lateral-to-medial) and the side receiving the longitudinal approach (US probe parallel to muscle fibers; needle in-plane cephalad-to-caudad) will be randomized. The blocks will be performed with a standardized volume and concentration of local anesthetic, under real-time US guidance by the same experienced anesthesiologist. The research team member assessing the block will be blinded. Immediately after injection of each block, US imaging will be used to assess and measure the length and pattern of spread within the posterior rectus sheath. At baseline and at 60 minutes post-block, dermatomal sensory mapping will be performed using standardized cold and pinprick stimuli over the anterior abdominal wall.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The block will be performed by advancing the needle into the posterior rectus sheath compartment, with the local anesthetic deposited posterior to the rectus abdominis muscle and anterior to the posterior rectus sheath.
Drug: 20 mL injection of 1.0% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) on each side (40mL total/subject)
Time frame: 60 to 90 minutes post-block
Skin temperature assessment using gloved ice on the chest wall, to discriminate blocked vs unblock areas.
Time frame: 60 to 90 minutes post-block
Mechanical assessment using a neuropin (pinprick) on the chest wall, to discriminate blocked vs unblock areas.
Time frame: 60 to 90 minutes post-block
Mapping the blocked area (using the previous temperature and mechanical assessments, demarcating lines on the skin) to provide a visual map and, to calculate the area blocked.
Time frame: Immediately post-block
Direct visualization of the local anesthetic spread cephalad and caudad, marking the highest and lowest dermatomes where local anesthetic was still seen on the US, with the US oriented longitudinally.
Time frame: Immediately post-block
Measurement of the local anesthetic spread in each dermatome with the US oriented transversely, by measuring hypoecoic area produced by the presence of local anesthetic.
Time frame: End of study (2 days post blocks).
Any adverse events block-related will be recorded
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
David MacLeod, MBBS
CONTACT
Sara Amaral, MD
CONTACT
Duke University
Other
Transverse Versus Longitudinal Approaches for Rectus Sheath Block: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers
Acronym: REST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07566312
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
View Trial DetailsNCT07683663
Acute Pain, Arthritis
Izmir, Balçova, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07232979
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
View Trial DetailsNCT07500454
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial Details