Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Chon Buri, Chon Buri 20110 Recruiting
Si Racha, Changwat Chon Buri, 20110, Thailand
NCT Number: NCT07260240
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which method of intravenous fluid works better for treating abnormal fetal heart rate patterns during labour in low-risk pregnant women at term. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does a rapid fluid bolus (500 mL given quickly) convert abnormal fetal heart rate tracings to normal within 30 minutes better than slow continuous infusion? Researchers will compare a 500 mL normal saline bolus followed by continuous infusion to continuous infusion alone to see which method improves fetal heart rate patterns faster.
Participants will:
* Be placed in the left lateral position and receive supplemental oxygen by face mask * Have oxytocin stopped if it is being given * Receive normal saline through an IV line - either as a rapid bolus or a slow continuous drip, depending on which group they are assigned to * Have fetal heart rate monitored continuously and assessed at 30, 60, and 120 minutes * Have blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen levels checked every 15 minutes * Have two ultrasound measurements taken - one of a vein in the abdomen and one of blood flow in the umbilical cord - at the start and at 30 minutes
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–35 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Si Racha, Changwat Chon Buri, 20110, Thailand
Intravenous fluid is a key component of intrauterine resuscitation (IUR) for Category II fetal heart rate tracings. However, no randomised trial has compared bolus versus continuous infusion directly.
Intervention :
Both groups receive normal saline from a 1000 mL bag through a 21-gauge cannula. The bolus group receives the first 500 mL as a rapid free-flow infusion (IV bag positioned 110 cm above hand level), followed by the remaining 500 mL at 150 mL/h. The continuous group receives the full 1000 mL at 150 mL/h throughout. All participants also receive standard IUR: left lateral positioning, oxytocin discontinuation where applicable, and supplemental oxygen 10 L/min by face mask.
Outcome Assessment :
The primary outcome (EFM category at 30 minutes) is assessed by the attending physician from a separate room, blinded to group allocation. All EFM tracings are also independently re-adjudicated by two blinded reviewers after delivery.
Physiological Surrogates :
A single trained operator measures inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) by M-mode ultrasound and umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index (UA PI) at baseline and 30 minutes to assess maternal volume status and fetoplacental resistance.
Statistical Analysis :
The primary analysis uses Fisher's exact test with risk difference, relative risk, and number needed to treat. Cumulative recovery is modelled by discrete-time survival analysis. A pre-specified BMI subgroup analysis and blinded re-adjudication sensitivity analysis are included.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants receive 500 mL of normal saline as a rapid free-flow intravenous bolus through a 21-gauge cannula, with the IV bag positioned 110 cm above hand level. Once 500 mL is delivered, the remaining 500 mL from the same bag is continued at 150 mL/h. All infusions are continued until delivery or clinical decision to discontinue.
Time frame: 30 minutes
Proportion of participants with conversion from Category II to Category I electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) tracing within 30 minutes of intervention initiation, classified using the NICHD three-tier system. Recovery is defined as conversion to Category I. Non-recovery is defined as persistence of Category II or progression to Category III at 30 minutes. Classification is performed by the attending physician by real-time bedside assessment.
Time frame: 60 minutes
Proportion of participants with conversion from Category II to Category I EFM tracing within 60 minutes of intervention initiation, using the same NICHD classification.
Time Frame:
Time frame: 120 minutes
Proportion of participants with conversion from Category II to Category I EFM tracing within 120 minutes of intervention initiation.
Time frame: At delivery
Route of delivery classified as vaginal delivery or caesarean section.
Time frame: Within 24 hours of delivery
Proportion of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit following delivery.
Time frame: 1 minute after delivery
Proportion of neonates with 1-minute Apgar score below 7
Time frame: 5 minutes after delivery
Proportion of neonates with 5-minute Apgar score below 7
Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
Other
Recovery Rate From Category II to Category I Electronic Fetal Monitoring (EFM) Tracings in Pregnant Women Receiving Bolus vs Continuous Intravenous Fluid Administration: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: IUR-RCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06405984
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05946681
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Birth Asphyxia
Lusaka, Zambia
View Trial DetailsNCT03764696
Fetal Distress, Labour
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04986475
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details