Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04007497

Reconstruction of Hand and Upper Extremities Defects by Thin Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps, Still a Valid Option in Developing Countries: A Cross Sectional Study

Traumatic defects of the soft tissues of the hand and upper extremities are common and may be challenging to the reconstructive surgeon. Several reconstructive procedures have been described to manage these defects, including local, regional, distant, and free flaps. The aim of this study is to report the techniques, outcomes, and complications of pedicle abdominal flaps in reconstructing hand and upper extremity defects. We included patients with different traumatic defects in the hand and upper extremities who underwent reconstruction by random pedicle abdominal flaps between 2002 and 2017. Data was collected and analyzed, variables studied included; patient age and sex, etiology and size of the defect, complications, outcomes, and the need for further revision procedures. Potential factors affecting flap survival were examined using appropriate statistical analysis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

School of Medicine

Amman, 11182, Jordan

About this study

Traumatic soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremity are common and may be challenging to the reconstructive surgeon, especially when they are severe and associated with exposed vital structures such as tendons, nerves, bones, and joints. Although these defects are rarely lethal; they are invariably resource demanding, and a source of significant long-term disability. Several reconstructive procedures have been described to cover hand and upper extremities soft tissue defects, including local, regional, distant, and free flaps. Traditionally, pedicle abdominal flaps, whether axial or randomly based, have been considered the standard for successful upper limb reconstruction.

With the introduction of microsurgery in the seventies of the last century, microsurgical free tissue transfers have become the gold standard for upper extremities functional reconstruction. Free flaps and other microsurgical techniques have been used to achieve early, functional, custom-tailored reconstructive solutions for upper limbs injuries. However, despite the superiority of free flaps, this option may not be always accessible especially in developing countries, owing to the high cost and technical demands. Moreover, they may be contraindicated in certain circumstances. In these situations, pedicle abdominal flaps may once again come into the light as an alternative option for safe and effective upper extremities reconstruction.

At Jordan University Hospital, with limited microsurgical facilities, the investigators have been using random pedicle abdominal flaps in patients with different traumatic hand and upper extremities defects. The aim of this retrospective study is to report the investigator's experience in using this technique, in regards to the indications, complications, outcomes, and evaluating factors affecting flap survival rate.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • different traumatic defects in the hand and upper extremities who underwent reconstruction by random pedicle abdominal flaps

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with incomplete data about the patient and the surgery

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Reconstruction of hand and upper extremities defects by thin random pedicle abdominal flaps

    Time frame: 2002 and 2017

    The investigators will examine success rate of randome abdominal flap in managing upper extremity's defects

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Jordan

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jul 5, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.