EMS department - Hospital René Dubos - Pontoise
Pontoise, 95300, France
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Dr Ariane Zoya-Gillet
CONTACT
Julie Narcisse
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05523999
This study aims to evaluate the average time taken by the Medical Regulation Assistants (MRA) to detect a cardiac arrest during the call to the EMS as well as the factors influencing this delay.
Its main objective is to evaluate the delay, in seconds, between the call being picked up and the recognition of a cardiac arrest by the medical regulation assistant at the EMS 95
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Pontoise, 95300, France
Location status: Recruiting
Dr Ariane Zoya-Gillet
CONTACT
Julie Narcisse
CONTACT
In France, the incidence of cardiac arrest in adults is approximately 40,000 per year. It is a major cause of mortality with an average survival rate of 8%, as well as morbidity, particularly neurological morbidity for surviving patients. The majority of cardiac arrests occur at In France, the incidence of cardiac arrest in adults is approximately 40,000 per year. It is a major cause of mortality with an average survival rate of 8%, as well as morbidity, particularly neurological morbidity for surviving patients. The majority of cardiac arrests occur at home, in the presence of a witness.
In the event of a cardiac arrest, every minute counts. Studies have shown that the time between the patient's collapse and the start of ECM (External Cardiac Massage) is directly correlated to the survival rate after a cardiac arrest.
According to other studies, a maximum delay of 90 seconds between the call to the EMS and the recognition of the cardiac arrest would be the most optimal for the patient, but is it reached at the EMS 95? This study aims at evaluating the average time taken by the Assistants of Medical Regulation (ARM) to detect a cardiac arrest during the call to the EMS as well as the factors influencing this delay.
Its main objective is to evaluate the delay, in seconds, between the call pick-up and the recognition of a cardiac arrest by the medical regulation assistant at the EMS 95. This evaluation will be made in particular by determining the elements of language highlighting the cardiac arrest, those which lengthen the time of detection of the arrest and the delay of starting a procedure by the ARM. The study will be conducted within the EMS and will include a review of the current state of knowledge and experience of the MRAs. This study will be carried out within the EMS 95.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prospective study within the EMS 95, to evaluate if the maximum delay of 90 seconds between the call to the EMS and the recognition of the cardiac arrest is reached.
Time frame: At the end of the study, an average of 5 month
Measure of the time in seconds between picking up the phone and the recognition of the cardiac arrest by the medical regulation assistant
Time frame: At the end of the study, an average of 5 month
Collection of the initial reason for appeal and everything said by the witness that may point to cardiac arrest
Time frame: At the end of the study, an average of 5 month
Collection of everything said by the witness increasing the detection of the cardiac arrest
Time frame: At the end of the study, an average of 5 month
Collection of time (seconds) between :
Time frame: At the end of the study, an average of 5 month
Collection of call tone (witness anxiety level) and MRA experience in years
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Maryline Delattre
CONTACT
Mathilde Wlodarczyk
CONTACT
Hôpital NOVO
Other
Evaluation of the Optimal Time of Recognition of a Cardiac Arrest Within the EMS 95
Acronym: ACR90
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07434726
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06672159
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrest
Trondheim, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05890716
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrest
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT07707037
Anxiety Depression, Cardiac Arrest
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details