Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06142058

RecistTM Criteria in Evaluating the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy for NSCLC

Investigators established the efficacy evaluation criteria for tumor markers (RecistTM) in the preliminary research. Among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, patients with positive driving genes are more likely to exhibit abnormalities in tumor markers, which suggests that this criteria may be more suitable for evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapy in driving gene positive patients. Moreover, The judgment rules of the prelimary criteria still need further improvement. Therefore, in order to broaden the application scope of the RecistTM criteria, further improve the evaluation rules of RecistTM criteria, and multi-dimensionally confirm the reliability of RecistTM criteria on efficacy evaluation, investigators plan to conduct research on the application of RecistTM criteria in evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with positive driving genes.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Cancer Center, Dapping Hospital, Army Medical Center of PLA

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Xueqin Yang, PH.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

86-23-68757151

Xueqin Yang, PH.D.

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Investigators established the efficacy evaluation criteria for tumor markers (RecistTM) in the preliminary research. The establishment of this criteria makes the application of tumor markers in clinical efficacy evaluation more objective and solves the problem of consistency in clinical efficacy evaluation. Among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, patients with positive driving genes are more likely to exhibit abnormalities in tumor markers, which suggests that this criteria may be more suitable for evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapy in driving gene positive patients. Moreover, The judgment rules of the preliminary criteria still need further improvement. . Therefore, in order to broaden the application scope of the RecistTM criteria, further improve the evaluation rules of RecistTM criteria, and multi-dimensionally confirm the reliability of RecistTM criteria on efficacy evaluation, investigators plan to conduct research on the application of RecistTM criteria in evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with positive driving genes. Investigators used statistical analysis to assess the consistency of efficacy evaluation between the RecistTM criteria and the RECIST criteria, the correlation between different efficacy and progression free survival (PFS) under the RecistTM, and the correlation between the efficacy of RecistTM criteria and ctDNA level.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • NSCLC patients with stage IIIB-IV
  • Driver gene positive (EGFR,ALK,C-MET, ROS,RET, HER2);
  • First line targeted therapy.
  • Performance status of 0-2 on the ECOG criteria.
  • Any one of the tumor markers is more than three times higher than the normal level, and the tumor markers include: CEA>15ng/ml,CA-199>105U/ml,CA-125>105 U/ml, NSE>60 ng/ml, SCCAg>7.5 ng/ml, CYFRA21-1>21 ng/ml, et al.
  • Measurable lesions present
  • Age>=18
  • Adequate hematologic (neutrophil count >= 1,500/uL, platelets >= 60,000/uL,hemoglobin≥70g/L), hepatic (transaminase =< upper normal limit(UNL)x2.5, bilirubin level =< UNLx1.5), and renal (creatinine =< UNL) function.
  • Informed consent from patient or patient's relative.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with dysphagia;
  • Unable to taking medication on time;
  • Patients with a history of abuse of psychotropic substances who are unable to quit or have mental disorders

Treatment and study plan

RecistTM criteria

Diagnostic Test

RecistTM criteria and RECIST criteria were used to evaluate the efficacy of targeted therapy for NSCLC with positive driving gene.

Other names: RECIST criteria

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation consistency

    Time frame: efficacy evaluation at the 1st, 3rd, 6th month after treatment, and every 3 months thereafter up to 1 year

    The ratio of the number of patients with the same efficacy evaluated both by RecistTM and Recist criteria to the total number of the patients.

Secondary outcomes

  1. progression-free survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months

    The correlation between the efficacy evaluation results of the RecistTM criteria and the RECIST criteria and PFS

Other outcomes

  1. The correlation between the efficacy evaluation results of the RecistTM criteria and the results of ctDNA testing

    Time frame: At the 1st, 3rd, 6th month after treatment, and at the time of disease progression, up to 2 years

    The correlation between the efficacy evaluated by the RecistTM criteria and the ctDNA amounts detected by NGS

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Xueqin Yang, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

15923366936

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xueqin Yang

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Application of the RecistTM Criteria in Evaluating the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Positive Driving Genes

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2028
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
Registry last updated
Nov 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.