AVIVO Mobile Patient Management (MPM) System
DeviceWearable, wireless physiological monitoring and arrhythmia detection system, used by participants for 5 monitoring periods of 5 days each in the study
NCT Number: NCT03507439
The study aims to explore two marketed devices providing a multimarker monitoring including physical activity under real-life conditions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It aims to identify potential novel endpoints for future heart failure trials by exploring clinically relevant changes over time and correlations/associations with conventional endpoints such as the six minute walking distance (6MWD), biomarkers and clinical events. Furthermore, it aims to address the challenges and feasibility of implementing device based measurements under real-life conditions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Device 1 AVIVO Mobile Patient Management System (Medtronic USA), substituted by VitalPatch biosensor (VitalConnect USA) during the course of the study Device 2 DynaPort Move Monitor (McRoberts, NL)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Wearable, wireless physiological monitoring and arrhythmia detection system, used by participants for 5 monitoring periods of 5 days each in the study
Wearable, wireless physiological monitoring and arrhythmia detection system, used by participants for 5 monitoring periods of 5 days each in the study
Wearable device for ambulatory monitoring of physical activity, used by participants for 2 monitoring periods of 7 days each in the study
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 77
Daily steps count was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated to reflect the amount of daily physical activity.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 77
Movement intensity of an activity, which was the average body acceleration (g) during this activity, was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated as daily physical activity level (PAL). Higher values indicate higher physical activity level and intensity.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 77
Total daily energy expenditure was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated to reflect the amount of daily physical activity.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 77
Duration of daily physical activity was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 77
Time duration per activity status was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated to reflect the intensity of daily physical activity. Physical Activity intensities use absolute aerobic intensity in terms of Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), which is a physiological concept expressing the energy cost of a physical activity as a multiple of Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR). By convention, 1 MET is considered as the resting metabolic rate obtained during quiet sitting. According to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) thresholds for adults: Light-intensity activities are defined as 1.1 MET to 2.9 METs; Moderate-intensity activities are defined as 3.0 to 5.9 METs; Vigorous-intensity activities are defined as 6.0 METs or more.
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Amount of daily physical activity was collected and measured with VitalPatch biosensor.
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Duration of daily physical activity was collected and measured with VitalPatch biosensor.
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Intensity of daily physical activity was collected and measured with VitalPatch biosensor.
Time frame: At Day 84
6-minute walking distance (6MWD) is a exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. An increase in the distance walked indicates improvement in basic mobility.
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Sleep movements was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Sleep patterns was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Sit-to-stand behaviour was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is the leading health-related quality-of-life measure for patients with heart failure (HF). It is a 23-item questionnaire that independently measures the impact of patients' HF, or its treatment, on 7 distinct domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, physical limitation, quality of life, social limitations, self-efficacy and symptoms stability. Physical Limitation ranges 0-100. Total Symptom Score (range 0-100) combines the Symptom Frequency and the Symptom Burden scores; Clinical Summary Score (range 0-100) combines the Total Symptom and Physical Limitation scores to replicate the NYHA classification; Overall Summary Score (range 0-100) includes the Total Symptom, Physical Limitation, Social Limitations, and Quality of Life scores. Higher scores indicate more favorable states.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 77
REALIsM-HF exploratory daily questionnaire was developed to include patient-reported outcome (PRO) items that can be administered as a daily diary in the study. Overall activity score ranges from 0 to 240 and general physical activity score ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate more favorable states.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 77
REALIsM-HF exploratory daily questionnaire was developed to include patient-reported outcome (PRO) items that can be administered as a daily diary in the study. Answers to question "How have your physical activities changed since you were discharged from the hospital": 1= Very much more physically active; 2= Much more physically active; 3= A little more physically active; 4= No change in physical activities; 5= A little less physically active; 6= Much less physically active; 7= Very much less physically active. Answers to questions "How has your feeling of tiredness changed since you were discharged from the hospital", "How has your shortness of breath changed since you were discharged from the hospital" and "How has your swelling in your legs, ankles, or feet changed since you were discharged from the hospital": 1= Very much improved; 2= Much improved; 3= Minimally improved; 4= No change; 5= Minimally worse; 6= Much worse; 7= Very much worse.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
Blood sample for biomarkers including Copeptin were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
Blood sample for biomarkers including Galectin-3 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
Blood sample for biomarkers including GDF 15 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
Blood sample for biomarkers including sST2 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls. Values above upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) were substituted by ULOQ for the calculation of statistics (ULOQ = 80.0)
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
Blood sample for biomarkers including IGFBP7 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
Blood sample for biomarkers including NT-proBNP were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
Blood sample for biomarkers including hsTRT were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls. Values below lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were substituted by 1/2 LLOQ for the calculation of statistics (LLOQ = 13.0)
Time frame: At Day 9, Day 77 and Day 84
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were collected.
Time frame: At Day 9, Day 77 and Day 84
Heart rate data were collected by electrocardiogram (ECG).
Time frame: At Day 84
Interventricular septal wall thickness was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Diameter of the left ventricle in diastole was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Diameter of the left ventricle in systole was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Left ventricular end-systolic volume was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Left atrial end-systolic volume was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Left atrial end systolic volume index was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Mitral peak velocity of early filling (E) was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Mitral peak velocity of late filling (A) was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Mitral lateral annulus early diastolic peak velocity was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Mitral septal annulus early diastolic peak velocity was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Pressure gradient of tricuspid valve was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: At Day 84
Right atrial mean pressure was measured by echocardiography.
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Heart rate variability (HRV) derived from ECG were measured with AVIVO MPM and VitalPatch biosensor
Time frame: At Day 9 and Day 84
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. The Stages of Heart Failure: Class I = No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. Class II = Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III = Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20 - 100 m). Comfortable only at rest. Class IV = Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.
Time frame: From signing the ICF until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. An AE may or may not be temporally or causally associated with the use of a medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly and another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator.
Bayer
Industry
Real Life Multimarker Monitoring in Patients With Heart Failure
Acronym: REALIsM-HF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03446651
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05806606
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT06847438
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07721909
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Muscat, Oman
View Trial Details