Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05065931

Real-world Effectiveness Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support System Based on Artificial Intelligence (AI-CDSS)

This study intends to explore the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of AI based CDSS system and promotion of clinical work by comparing CDSS before and after the online.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, China

About this study

This study intends to explore the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of AI based CDSS system and promotion of clinical work by comparing CDSS before and after the online. The difference of diagnostic accuracy before and after AI-CDSS application will be compared by the before and after design, and the role of AI-CDSS will be explored.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • all hospitalized patients in 6 clinical departments, Otolaryngology, Orthopaedic, Respiratory Medicine, General Surgery, Cardiology and Hematology from December 2016 to February 2019.

Exclusion criteria

  • Missing data for key variables

Treatment and study plan

Auxiliary diagnostic system by AI-CDSS

Other

Helping clinicians to make diagnoses by using CDSS based-on AI

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy Rate of Recommended Diagnosis by CDSS, up to 12 weeks

    Time frame: When the subject was discharged from the hospital

    Based on the patient's discharge diagnosis as a standard, it is explored whether the diagnosis given by the CDSS is consistent with the discharge diagnosis in the patient's medical record.

  2. Patients' hospitalization time (days), up to 24 weeks

    Time frame: When the subject was discharged from the hospital

    The length of a patient's stay is the number of days he or she experiences from the time of admission to the time of discharge.

  3. consistency between admission diagnosis and discharge diagnosis up to 12 weeks

    Time frame: When the subject was discharged from the hospital

    When the patient comes to the hospital, the clinician will write an inpatient record and give a preliminary diagnosis, which we call admission diagnosis.After the patient is hospitalized, all kinds of examinations will be improved. After all the examination results come out, the patient's diagnosis on admission may be modified. Because there are no auxiliary examination results on admission, the diagnosis on admission may not be completely correct.This modified diagnosis is called discharge diagnosis.This study compared the consistent rate of admission diagnosis and discharge diagnosis before and after CDSS on-line.

Secondary outcomes

  1. length of confirmed time, up to 6 weeks

    Time frame: When the subject was discharged from the hospital

    he length of confirmed time (days) was the duration between the preliminary admission diagnosis and the definite diagnosis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Real-world Effectiveness Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support System Based on Artificial Intelligence (AI-CDSS) on Diagnosis

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 4, 2021
Registry last updated
Oct 4, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.