LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
Toronto, Ontario, M4G3E8, Canada
NCT Number: NCT06962735
The objective of this retrospective, observational study, is to better understand the real-world glycemic effectiveness of switching to real time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) from intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among adults with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes in Canada.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Toronto, Ontario, M4G3E8, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Individuals who switched from using isCGM to rtCGM
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in HbA1c at 6-12-month follow-up compared to baseline after switching from an isCGM system to a rtCGM system in adults with type 1 diabetes
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To compare 6-12 month change in HbA1c in the rtCGM switch cohort, who switched from isCGM to rtCGM, compared to a propensity score matched isCGM cohort, who maintained isCGM use, among a subgroup of patients with T1D and HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in percent TIR at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in percent TBR at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in percent TAR at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in mean glucose at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in SD of mean glucose at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in CV of mean glucose at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in weight at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: evaluated at 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate the proportion of patients who achieve HbA1c ≤7.0% at 6-12 months follow-up in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% at baseline and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% at baseline.
Time frame: evaluated at 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate weekly incidence of self-reported hypoglycemia at 6-12 months in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: evaluated at 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate proportion of patients with ≥ 1 self-reported hypoglycemic event at 6-12 months in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate change in TDD of insulin at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Time frame: from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-up
To evaluate proportion of patients using a Tandem® insulin pump in the rtCGM switch cohort during the study period from baseline to 6-12 months follow-up.
LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
Other
Effect of Switching From Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With Diabetes: A Real-world, Canadian Retrospective Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00038727
Body Weight, CVD
Rockville, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01934660
Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07728162
Diabetes Mellitus, Disease Attributes
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details