Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04335318
The objective of this study is to compare the polyp detection rate (PDR) of endoscopists unaware of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) device for polyp detection during colonoscopy and the PDR of endoscopists with the aid of such a device. Moreover, an extensive characterization of the performance of this device will be done.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080, Germany
Recently, there have been remarkable breakthroughs in the introduction of deep learning techniques, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in assisting clinical diagnosis in different medical fields. One of these artificial intelligence (AI) devices to diagnose colon polyps during colonoscopy was launched in October 2019. Its intended use is to work as an adjunct to the endoscopist during a colonoscopy with the purpose of highlighting regions with visual characteristics consistent with different types of mucosal abnormalities.
It is essential to know whether deep learning algorithms can really help endoscopists during colonoscopies. Several studies have already addressed this issue with different approaches and results. However, one common drawback of these type of Machine vs Human retrospective studies is endoscopist bias. It is usually generated because of human natural competitive spirit against machine or human relaxation because of AI-reliance. This can have an effect in the overall results.
The investigators perfomed colonoscopies with the use of a commercially available AI system to detect colonic polyps and recorded them during clinical routine. Additionally from March 2019 - May 2019, 120 colonoscopy videos were performed and captured prospectively without the use of AI.
In this study, the investigators plan to retrospectively compare those two video sets regarding the polyp detection rate, withdrawal time and polyp identification characteristics of the AI system.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Colonoscopies performed with assistance of an AI tool that highlights the areas that are susceptible to be a polyp.
Time frame: 45 minutes
Number of polyps detected divided by number of colonoscopies
Time frame: 45 minutes
Mean withdrawal time comparison
Time frame: 45 minutes
2 approaches: frame by frame analysis and temporal coherence analysis
Time frame: 45 minutes
3 approaches depending on window-time detection
Time frame: 45 minutes
Number of by bounding box missed polyps
Time frame: 45 minutes
Comparison time of polyp detection in a human vs machine approach
Wuerzburg University Hospital
Other
Acronym: RELIANT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05869838
Colonic Polyp, Colonic Polyps
Hanover, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04858477
Colonic Polyp, Colonic Polyps
Brooklyn, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05322993
Colonic Polyp, Colonic Polyps
Bergen, Vestland, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT03962868
Colonic Polyp, Colonic Polyps
Limoges, France
View Trial Details