Respimat
DrugSoft Mist Inhaler product
Other names: (Spiriva®, Striverdi® or, Spiolto®)
NCT Number: NCT04011735
The study is to assess patient satisfaction with the inhaler attributes of the re-usable Respimat SMI (Spiriva, Striverdi or Spiolto) in patients with COPD, including patients who are Respimat SMI-experienced and Respimat SMI-naïve. This study also aims to examine patient preference for the re-usable Respimat SMI compared to the disposable Respimat SMI in Respimat SMI-experienced patients switching from a disposable to a re-usable Respimat SMI product at study entry.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Brussels - UNIV UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients fulfilling all the following inclusion criteria will be eligible for participation in the study:
Exclusion criteria
Patients fulfilling any of the following exclusion criteria will not be eligible for participation in the study:
Soft Mist Inhaler product
Other names: (Spiriva®, Striverdi® or, Spiolto®)
Time frame: At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Total PASAPQ score is a measure of patient's satisfaction regarding the handling of the re-usable Respimat® SMI. The total score was the sum of the 13 items related to Performance and Convenience PASAPG domains (7 items for Performance domain: Q 1-5, 10-11, and 6 items for convenience domain: Q6-9, 12-13).
Each PASAPQ item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the total and domain score, the items within each domain were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) or 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction:
Performance score = 100 *[(Q1+Q2 +Q3+ Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)-7] /(49-7)
Convenience score = 100 *[(Q6+ Q7+Q8+Q9+Q12+Q13)-6] / (42-6)
Total score = 100 *[(Q1+Q2 +Q3+Q4+ Q5+Q6 + Q7+Q8+ Q9+Q10+Q11+Q12+Q13)-13] / (91-13)
Time frame: At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
The performance domain score of PASAPQ contained 7 items (Q 1-5 and 10-11), each item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the domain score, the items were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction:
Performance score = 100 * [(Q1+ Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)-7] / (49-7)
Time frame: At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
The convenience domain score of PASAPQ contained 6 items (Question 6-9 and 12-13), each item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the domain score, the items were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction:
Convenience score = 100 * [(Q6+Q7+Q8+Q9+Q12+Q13)-6] / (42-6)
Time frame: At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
The overall satisfaction score of the PASAPQ asked for the overall satisfaction with the device used in the study (Question 14), answered using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). Reported is the number of patients by category.
Time frame: At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
To assess the willingness to continue with inhaler, the following questions was asked: "How would you feel about continuing to use the inhaler?", using a value from 0-100, with zero indicating that the patient is not willing to continue using the inhaler and 100 indicating that the patient is definitely willing to continue using the inhaler.
Time frame: At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
10 Questions regarding the Ease of Handling were asked, using a 7 point scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). Reported is the number of patients by answer category.
Time frame: At study entry (baseline) and at study end (4 to 6 weeks after baseline).
Difference in the mean Total PASAPQ score between study entry (baseline visit) and at study end (follow-up assessment) in Respimat SMI-experienced patients who switched from a disposable to a re-usable Respimat SMI product at study entry.
The total score was the sum of the 13 items related to Performance and Convenience PASAPG domains (7 items for Performance domain: Q 1-5, 10-11, and 6 items for convenience domain: Q6-9, 12-13).
Each PASAPQ item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the total and domain score, the items within each domain were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) or 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Time frame: At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Number of patients with preference for re-usable or disposable Respimat SMI at study end (follow-up assessment), in Respimat SMI-experienced patients who switched from a disposable to a re-usable Respimat SMI product at study entry. To assess the preference for inhaler, following question was asked: "Comparing the re-usable with disposable inhaler, which inhaler do you prefer to use?"
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
A Real-world Non-interventional Study to Assess Patient Satisfaction With and Preference for Re-usable Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07252908
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Chongqing, Chognqing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07649577
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Amman, Jordan
View Trial DetailsNCT06979518
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Cypress, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06367686
Apnea, Chronic Disease
Tønsberg, Norway
View Trial Details