UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Tromsø, Troms, 9018, Norway
NCT Number: NCT06122441
The goal of the RESTART RCT is to examine whether a complex lifestyle intervention, coordinated with municipal and non-government organizations (NGO), can establish and preserve improvements in risk factors and functional capacity among older adults at high risk of cardiometabolic disease. The main objectives to investigate are whether a complex lifestyle intervention, compared to an active control group, will at 24 months have:
1. Produced a clinically relevant increase in cardiorespiratory fitness (primary endpoint) 2. Increased muscle strength, physical activity and reduced adiposity 3. Improved body composition, health-related quality of life and cognitive function
All participants (Control and Intervention Groups) are provided with wrist-worn activity trackers at baseline and access to national recommendations on physical activity. The intervention group additionally advances through a comprehensive lifestyle program including high-intensity aerobic and strength exercise, dietary and behavioral counselling. Intervention participants are gradually transitioned into exercise activities organized by Tromsø Municipaity and local NGO:s. Testing of outcomes are performed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Primary endpoint (VO2max) is assessed at 24 months.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me60 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tromsø, Troms, 9018, Norway
The proportion of older individuals worldwide is growing, posing a significant challenge to western societies. To address the health challenges of the aging population, primary prevention efforts should focus on various lifestyle factors simultaneously. However, many interventions fail to maintain improved lifestyle habits among participants, highlighting the need for novel and complex approaches to ensure healthy aging among older adults.
The RESTART randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether participants undergoing a complex lifestyle intervention improve their cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, physical activity, adiposity and body composition, quality of life and cognitive function at 24 months, compared to active controls.
The study and data collection will occur in Tromsø, Norway (pop. 77,000). Participants will receive the intervention at a local community exercise center near the University of Tromsø campus area. Testing of physical performance will take place at the UiT Faculty of Health Sciences research laboratory for sports, physical activity, and public health. The Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) at the local university hospital will additionally oversee clinical examinations, collection of questionnaire data, and blood sampling.
At baseline, both the Control and Intervention Groups are given wrist-worn activity trackers and access to national physical activity recommendations. The Intervention Group also undergoes a comprehensive lifestyle program that includes high-intensity aerobic and strength exercises, as well as dietary and behavioral counseling. The Intervention Group is gradually introduced to exercise activities organized by Tromsø Municipality and local NGOs. Outcome testing is conducted at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, with the primary endpoint (VO2max) assessed at 24 months.
Intervention participants will be divided into 4 groups of 12-15 participants each and perform high-intensity training to target the cardiovascular system and skeletal muscle force-generating capacity. For 12 months, the intervention group performs supervised indoor cycling or outdoor hill interval training twice a week at a relatively high intensity (≥85% of maximal heart rate during 4x4 minutes) separated by active rest periods at approximately 70% of maximal heart rate. Immediately after the aerobic exercise, participants perform strength training (3 sets of 5 repetitions) involving leg-press, lateral pull-down, and chest press exercises, with an intensity corresponding to ≥80% of their maximal strength. From months 6-12, one of the two weekly exercise sessions will be led by the Healthy Life Center (HLC; "Frisklivssentralen"), enabling a transition to supervised exercise via the Tromsø municipality primary health care. Between month 12-18, the HLC continue to supervise the participants during one weekly exercise sessions, while they are additionally introduced to exercise activities arranged by local NGO:s.
From month 3 to 12, participants will receive behavioral counseling based on the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) approach during six 2-hour group sessions. The individual approach aims to enhance participants' capacity to manage challenging cognitive and emotional experiences, foster psychological flexibility and distress tolerance skills, and promote the development of self-efficacy and new behavior patterns that align with their life values.
From month 6 to 12, the intervention group will receive four dietary counseling sessions based on Norwegian nutritional guidelines. Two individual sessions will involve food diaries, while two group sessions with a partner will focus on basic nutritional information and practical food preparation. The objective is to promote a healthy, sustainable, and personalized diet while promoting increased protein intake, reducing the consumption of high-energy-dense foods and drinks with low nutritional value.
Beginning from month 12 and onwards throughout the trial, the intervention group will be granted access to the Re-start eTool (https://re-start.no/), which is specifically tailored to older adults. The eTool offers concise and easy-to-understand articles, videos, and self-assessment tools that promote physical activity, healthy dietary habits, and behavioral strategies from the complex intervention. The Re-start eTool aims to provide support and reminders to participants as they gradually transition to independently maintaining the achieved lifestyle habits and physical capacity levels.
Throughout the study period, the intervention instructors and assessors monitor potential adverse events during the exercise and testing phases, and all adverse events are reported to the study coordinator. Measures to mitigate adverse events include: 1) insurance of participants via The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation; 2) involving a MD with sports medicine specialization to ensure treatment of potential injuries; 3) pilot study experiences show that short-term alternative exercises are effective in managing exercise-induced pain and discomfort.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The complex lifestyle intervention comprise high-intensity aerobic and strength exercise, behavioral counselling based on Acceptance and Commitment Theory (ACT), and dietary counselling based on Norwegian nutritional guidelines. The different intervention elements are introduced step-wise to reduce initial overload. Participants are progressively transitioned over to the Tromsø municipality and local NGO's, who delivers activities harmonized with the intervention elements. Participants are at this stage also supported by an eTool which digitally reinforces the intervention through web-based information and videos.
Wrist-worn activity trackers that are worn throughout the trial, which monitors steps, activity intensity and energy expenditure. Access to Norwegian physical activity guidelines via the Directorate of Health.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as ml/kg/min during an incremental test-to-exhaustion where the participant walks or runs on a motorized treadmill.
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as ml/kg/min during an incremental test-to-exhaustion where the participant walks or runs on a motorized treadmill.
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as ml/kg/min during an incremental test-to-exhaustion where the participant walks or runs on a motorized treadmill.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as the highest kg achieved during a 1-repetition maximum test in leg-press and chest-press apparatuses.
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as the highest kg achieved during a 1-repetition maximum test in leg-press and chest-press apparatuses.
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as the highest kg achieved during a 1-repetition maximum test in leg-press and chest-press apparatuses.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as power (W; force x speed of contraction) during leg-press exercise with pre-defined weight ascertained during baseline measurements
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as power (W; force x speed of contraction) during leg-press exercise with pre-defined weight ascertained during baseline measurements
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as power (W; force x speed of contraction) during leg-press exercise with pre-defined weight ascertained during baseline measurements
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed in centimeters at the umbilical level (between crista iliaca and the lower rib) using a measurement tape.
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed in centimeters at the umbilical level (between crista iliaca and the lower rib) using a measurement tape.
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed in centimeters at the umbilical level (between crista iliaca and the lower rib) using a measurement tape.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed in kilograms using a SECA personal weight. Participants are measured without outdoor clothing and shoes.
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed in kilograms using a SECA personal weight. Participants are measured without outdoor clothing and shoes.
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed in kilograms using a SECA personal weight. Participants are measured without outdoor clothing and shoes.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as minutes in light, moderate and vigorous intensity, using triaxial accelerometers worn at the hip for 7 days.
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as minutes in light, moderate and vigorous intensity, using triaxial accelerometers worn at the hip for 7 days.
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as minutes in light, moderate and vigorous intensity, using triaxial accelerometers worn at the hip for 7 days.
Time frame: 24 months
Asessed using wrist-worn smartwatches that are worn by the participants continously and measures steps, activity intensity and energy expenditure
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as percentage fat and lean mass in relation to total body mass using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as percentage fat and lean mass in relation to total body mass using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as fat/lean/bone mass in grams using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as fat/lean/bone mass in grams using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale in 5 different dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) using the EQ-5D-5L instrument
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale in 5 different dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) using the EQ-5D-5L instrument
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as the number of symbols correctly matched with numbers within the allowed time
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as the number of symbols correctly matched with numbers within the allowed time
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as litres/sec using the Micro 1 Spirometer with participants exhaling maximally for six seconds during three attempts with 30 seconds of rest in between.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as litres using the Micro 1 Spirometer with participants exhaling maximally for six seconds during three attempts with 30 seconds of rest in between.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as litres/min using the Micro 1 Spirometer with participants exhaling maximally for six seconds during three attempts with 30 seconds of rest in between.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as beats per minute three times in 1-minute intervals after an initial 2-minute rest
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as beats per minute three times in 1-minute intervals after an initial 2-minute rest
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as beats per minute three times in 1-minute intervals after an initial 2-minute rest
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as mmHg three times in 1-minute intervals after an initial 2-minute rest
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as mmHg three times in 1-minute intervals after an initial 2-minute rest
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as mmHg three times in 1-minute intervals after an initial 2-minute rest
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed in kg and performed according to the Southampton protocol
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed in kg and performed according to the Southampton protocol
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as time (s) to complete 5 consecutive chair rises, using the 5-repetition chair stand test according to the Short Physical Performance Battery protocol
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as time (s) to complete 5 consecutive chair rises, using the 5-repetition chair stand test according to the Short Physical Performance Battery protocol
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 7-point likert scale using the 5-item Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 7-point likert scale using the 5-item Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale using the 10-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale using the 10-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 7-point likert scale using the 10-item Physical Activity Acceptance Questionnaire (PAAQ)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 7-point likert scale using the 10-item Physical Activity Acceptance Questionnaire (PAAQ)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 4-point likert scale using the 4-item Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale Short Form (PACES-S)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 4-point likert scale using the 4-item Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale Short Form (PACES-S)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 4-point likert scale using the 3-item Emotional Eating Subscale from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 4-point likert scale using the 3-item Emotional Eating Subscale from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 7-point likert scale using the item on binge eating episodes from the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 7-point likert scale using the item on binge eating episodes from the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale using the 6-item Reliance on Internal Hunger and Satiety Cues Subscale from the Intuitive Eating Scale (IES)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale using the 6-item Reliance on Internal Hunger and Satiety Cues Subscale from the Intuitive Eating Scale (IES)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 4-point likert scale using the 10-item General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 4-point likert scale using the 10-item General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale using the 6-item Self-Compassion Scale
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with a 5-point likert scale using the 6-item Self-Compassion Scale
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using 4 alternatives (from elementary school to college/university) using the education status question from a standardized comprehensive questionnaire from the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with a 8-point likert scale using the household income question from a standardized comprehensive questionnaire from the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed with 9 nominal alternatives without intrinsic order using the occupation status question from a standardized comprehensive questionnaire from the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016)
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed with 9 nominal alternatives without intrinsic order using the occupation status question from a standardized comprehensive questionnaire from the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016)
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed with 9 nominal alternatives without intrinsic order using the occupation status question from a standardized comprehensive questionnaire from the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 5-item questionnaire on ideal weight combining 2 dichotomous (yes/no) scales and 3 continuous scales. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 5-item questionnaire on ideal weight combining 2 dichotomous (yes/no) scales and 3 continuous scales. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 11-item questionnaire with each item including a 3-point ordinal scale response option (no, yes-previously, yes-now). This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 11-item questionnaire with each item including a 3-point ordinal scale response option (no, yes-previously, yes-now). This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 10-item questionnaire including 8 items with dichotomous response alternatives and 6 items with ordinal scale response alternatives. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 10-item questionnaire including 7 items with dichotomous response alternatives and 3 items with ordinal scale response alternatives. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 9-item questionnaire including 8 items with ordinal scale response alternatives and 1 item with free text response alternative to list currently used medicine. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 9-item questionnaire including 8 items with ordinal scale response alternatives and 1 item with free text response alternative to list currently used medicine. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed using a 9-item questionnaire including 8 items with ordinal scale response alternatives and 1 item with free text response alternative to list currently used medicine. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 4-item questionnaire including 3 items with nominal scale response alternatives and 1 item with ordinal scale response alternative. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 4-item questionnaire including 3 items with nominal scale response alternatives and 1 item with ordinal scale response alternative. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 2-item questionnaire including ordinal scale response alternatives (never, yes-previously, yes-now). This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 2-item questionnaire including ordinal scale response alternatives (never, yes-previously, yes-now). This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 3-item questionnaire with ordinal scale response alternatives. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 3-item questionnaire with ordinal scale response alternatives. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using a 2-item questionnaire with 5-point ordinal scale response alternatives. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using a 2-item questionnaire with 5-point ordinal scale response alternatives. This questionnaire was developed as part of the comprehensive standardized questionnaire used in the 7th data collection wave of the Tromsø Study (2015-2016).
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using the 4-item Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using the 4-item Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed using the Norwegian NORKOST Food Frequency Questionnaire including 274 items on various food groups and specific foods
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed using the Norwegian NORKOST Food Frequency Questionnaire including 274 items on various food groups and specific foods
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as % using non-fasted blood samples analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as % using non-fasted blood samples analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as % using non-fasted blood samples analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed as mmol/l using non-fasted blood samples analysed with colorimetric (Homogen, or homogen enzymatic) methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Assessed as mmol/l using non-fasted blood samples analysed with colorimetric (Homogen, or homogen enzymatic) methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Assessed as mmol/l using non-fasted blood samples analysed with colorimetric (Homogen, or homogen enzymatic) methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Collected as non-fasting venous blood samples using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Collected as non-fasting venous blood samples using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Collected as non-fasting venous blood samples using standard methodsdescribed
Time frame: Baseline
Collected as non-fasting venous blood samples using standard methods. Used primarily as a potential exclusion criteria.
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Collected as non-fasting venous blood samples using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Collected as non-fasting venous blood samples using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Collected as a non-fasting venous blood sample using standard methods in order to monitor alcohol consumption
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Collected as a non-fasting venous blood sample using standard methods in order to monitor alcohol consumption
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Collected as a non-fasting venous blood sample using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Collected as a non-fasting venous blood sample using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Collected as a non-fasting venous blood sample using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Collected as a non-fasting venous blood sample using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Collected as a morning urine sample using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 12
Collected as a morning urine sample using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 6
Collected as a morning urine sample using standard methods
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed in milliseconds using a 12-point electrocardiogram (ECG) to evaluate the time interval from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex, to establish atrioventricular block (grade 1-3)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed in milliseconds using a 12-point electrocardiogram (ECG) to evaluate the atrial depolarization, and used to determine cardiac rhythm disturbance (atrial fibrillation)
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed in milliseconds using a 12-point electrocardiogram (ECG) to evaluate the characterization of the QRS-complex to determine ventricular tachycardia
Time frame: Baseline and month 24
Assessed in millivolts using a 12-point electrocardiogram (ECG) to determine T-wave inversion in V3-6 (negative from baseline)
Time frame: 24 months
Assessed using qualitative semi-structured interviews to provide a more comprehensive understanding of participants' experiences and motivation during the trial, and to find potential important determinants of lifestyle change. Qualitative data will be structured with the QRS NVivo software, and analyzed with content- or thematic analyses.
Time frame: 24 months
Data on resource use will be collected during the trial to facilitate health economic evaluation of the personalized lifestyle program. The trial has already mentioned collection of data on health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) that allows us to calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years, and to subsequently calculate cost-effectiveness (Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Years).
Time frame: 60 months
Assessed using linkage to the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry.
Time frame: 24 months
Monitored consequently by intervention and outcome assessment personell
University of Tromso
Other
RE-inventing Strategies for Healthy Ageing; Recommendations and Tools (RESTART) - a Randomized Controlled Trial Testing a Complex Lifestyle Intervention in Older Adults at Increased Risk for Cardiometabolic Disease
Acronym: RESTART
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05446220
Behavior, Body Composition
Herlev, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05449496
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07676110
Agnosia, Anxiety Disorders
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05056376
Behavior, Body Weight
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details