Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03287492

RCT of QPS vs General Information Sheet

This trial studies how well information materials work in helping communication between physicians and participants with cancer that has spread to other places in the body and their caregivers. Approaches that encourage participants to actively participate and ask appropriate questions during their visit may be important to enhance their understanding of their illness and empower them to make important decisions regarding their medical care.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare patients' perception of helpfulness in communicating with their physicians between a question prompt sheet (QPS) and a general information sheet (GIS).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare caregivers' perception of helpfulness in communicating with their physicians between the QPS and the GIS.

II. To examine the level of patients' and caregivers' overall satisfaction with the consultation with the use of the QPS versus the GIS.

III. To examine physicians' views about the information material and overall satisfaction with the use of the QPS versus the GIS.

IV. To explore how the use of QPS affects the average speaking time of patient or physician during the consultation visit.

V. To establish demographic and clinical predictors of patients' perception of helpfulness of a QPS.

VI. To examine the overall patients' preference between the QPS and GIS in an open label phase.

VII. To compare the change in patient anxiety state with the use of the QPS versus the GIS.

VIII. To explore the factors underlying patients' preferences for the QPS or GIS.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized into 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Participants receive QPS and answer questions from physician. At follow up visit, participants receive both QPS and GIS.

GROUP II: Participants receive GIS and answer questions from physician. At follow up visit, participants receive both QPS and GIS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • (Patient participation) First outpatient consultation visit with a palliative care specialist
  • (Patient participation) Normal cognitive status, defined as a normal state of arousal and an absence of obvious clinical findings of confusion, memory deficits or concentration deficits, as determined by the patient's physician
  • (Patient participation) Ability to read and communicate in English
  • (Patient participation) Diagnosis of advanced cancer
  • (Patient participation) Signed written informed consent form
  • (Caregiver participation) accompanied the patient to the clinic visit
  • (Caregiver participation) is identified by the patient as someone who is actively involved in their overall care
  • (Caregiver participation) is able to read and communicate in English
  • (Caregiver participation) is willing to participate in the study and able to complete the questionnaires
  • (Physician participation) a palliative medicine specialist
  • (Physician participation) seeing the patient in consultation on the day of the study
  • (Physician participation) willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

Informational intervention

Other

Receive QPS

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients' perception of helpfulness (0-10 scale) in communicating with their physicians after the first consultation visit

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Standard statistics including mean, standard deviation, median, range, frequency and percentage will be summarized for variables of interest, such as patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, anxiety state, patients'/caregivers' views about the information material, patients' satisfaction, physicians' views about the information material and consultation, patients' preferences for information, patient preferences for level of involvement in decision-making and patients' overall preference between the question prompt sheet (QPS) and the general information sheet (GIS) at the follow-up visit. Two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, whichever appropriate, will be used to compare continuous variables of interest between the QPS and the GIS. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, whichever appropriate, will be used to test for associations between categorical variables and helpfulness of information material.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Caregivers' perception of helpfulness in communicating with their physicians

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, whichever appropriate, will be used.

  2. Patients'/caregivers' overall satisfaction with the consultation

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, whichever appropriate, will be used.

  3. Physician's view/overall satisfaction about the information material

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, whichever appropriate, will be used.

  4. Average speaking time of patient or physician during the consultation visit affected by QPS

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, whichever appropriate, will be used to compare the average speaking time of patient or physician during the consultation visit. Also, general linear model will be applied to assess the effect of QPS on the average speaking time adjusting for clinically and/or statistically important factors.

  5. Overall patients' preference between the QPS and GIS in an open label phase

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Will estimate the preference of information material with 95% confidence intervals. Also, univariate/multicovariate logistic regression will be used to evaluate patients' demographic and clinical factors on overall patients' preference between QPS and GIS.

  6. Change in patient anxiety state scores before and after consultation between the QPS and the GIS

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6 weeks

    Sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, whichever appropriate, will be used.

  7. Demographic and clinical predictors of patients' perception of helpfulness of a QPS

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Univariate/multicovariate logistic regression will be used to evaluate patients' demographic and clinical factors on patients' perception of helpfulness of QPS when dichotomizing the answer to the question 3 in the Patient/Caregiver Assessment Questionnaire ("Agree/Strongly Agree"=Helpful versus the rest).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Different Information Materials in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 19, 2017
Registry last updated
Jul 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.