Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT02543372
Background: Problem gambling is a public health concern with prevalence rates at 2 %. Problem gambling also severely affects concerned significant others (CSOs). Several studies have investigated the effects of individual treatments based on cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), but there is a shortage in studies on the effect of involving CSOs in treatment. This study aims to compare an intervention based on behavioral couples therapy (BCT) involving a CSO with an individual CBT treatment to determine their relative efficacy. BCT has shown promising results in working with substance abuse, but this is the first time it is used as an intervention for problem gambling. Both interventions will be Internet-delivered and participants will receive e-mail and telephone support.
Method/Design: A sample of at least 100 couples will be randomized to either the BCT condition or the CBT condition. The participants will work through 10 modules over 12 weeks in a secure online environment, and receive support via email and over telephone. Repeated measures will be conducted weekly and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome measure is gambling behavior, defined as time spent and money lost on gambling, as measured by timeline follow-back. Secondary outcomes include gambling related harm, alcohol consumption, relationship satisfaction and mental health for the gambler as well as for the CSO.
Hypotheses: The investigators hypothesize that a) BCT will yield greater reductions on gambling measures than CBT, b) BCT will yield a lower drop-out rate compared to CBT, c) BCT will be superior to CBT on increasing relationship satisfaction, d) relationship functioning will mediate change in gambling behavior in the BCT group and e) reduction in gambling behavior will mediate change in relationship functioning in the CBT group.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
BCT integrates cognitive behavioral techniques targeting problem gambling with a large focus on interventions for relationship functioning. The BCT condition requires active participation from both the gambler and the CSO.
The CBT integrates cognitive behavioral techniques targeting problem gambling with some interventions for relationship functioning.The CBT condition requires active participation from the gambler, but not for the CSO.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] weekly during treatment;[2] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [3] month 6 and [4] month 12 after the treatment period.
Measures money and time spent on gambling by the gambler, as rated individually by the gambler and the CSO.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [2] month 6 and [3] month 12 after the treatment period.
Measures consequences of gambling, as rated by the problem gambler.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [2] month 6 and [3] month 12 after the treatment period.
Screening for depressive symptoms, as rated individually by the gambler and the CSO.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [2] month 6 and [3] month 12 after the treatment period.
Screening for anxiety, as rated individually by the gambler and the CSO.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] weekly during treatment;[2] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [3] month 6 and [4] month 12 after the treatment period.
Measures relationship satisfaction, as rated individually by the gambler and the CSO.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [2] month 6 and [3] month 12 after the treatment period.
Measures consequences of gambling, as rated individually by the gambler and the CSO.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [2] month 6 and [3] month 12 after the treatment period.
Measures alcohol consumption, as rated individually by the gambler and the CSO.
Time frame: Change from baseline at: [1] end of treatment period; follow-ups at [2] month 6 and [3] month 12 after the treatment period.
Measures dissociative experiences while gambling, as rated by the gambler.
Karolinska Institutet
Other
Internet-Delivered Treatments for Pathological Gambling: a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Added Involvement By Concerned Significant Others
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02841566
Behavior, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders
Nantes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05241041
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Incheon, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT04714008
Behavior, COVID-19
Nantes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07162220
Behavior, Child, Only
Antalya, Konyaaltı, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details