FoTv
Drug8 capsules three times a day for 14 consecutive days.
Other names: Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor
NCT Number: NCT04667247
This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate two polypore mushrooms, Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor (FoTv), to treat COVID-19-positive outpatients with mild-to-moderate symptoms assigned to self-quarantined and home management. The study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of the use of FoTv vs placebo in 66 total subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
Despite biomedical advances, medical intervention for COVID-19 is largely limited to vaccinations and supportive care during the later stages of disease. While antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antimalarial options have been explored for later stages of disease, fewer studies have been conducted on medications to reduce the risk of outpatient cases progressing to severe disease. Therefore, it is important that we broaden the search to include agents outside of our usual pharmacopeia. Integrative Medicine offers several promising therapeutics that are available today and warrant investigation.
Some of the botanicals used for their possible immune modulating functions include polypore mushrooms. Among these, Turkey Tail (Trametes versicolor) has a long history of use for its immune supporting properties. An RCT examining the effects of Trametes versicolor in breast cancer patients detected increases in lymphocyte counts and natural killer cell functional activity (Torkelson et al, 2012 and Benson et al, 2019) both of which are key to host COVID-19 response. Further investigations into other relevant mushroom species demonstrated that Agarikon (Fomitopsis officinalis) can strongly induce an array of differential cytokine responses associated with both immune-activation and resolution of host defense- induced inflammatory reactions (unpublished). This homeostatic effect deserves attention for COVID-19 given the high mortality rate associated with cytokine storm.
This is a multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate two polypore mushrooms, Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor (FoTv), to treat COVID-19-positive outpatients with mild-to-moderate symptoms assigned to self-quarantined and home management. This study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of the use of FoTv vs placebo in 66 total subjects. Subsequent trials will evaluate Chinese herbal medicine as well as the efficacy of FoTv in a larger study population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
8 capsules three times a day for 14 consecutive days.
Other names: Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
Time frame: 14 days
comparison of the Total Bilirubin of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
Time frame: 14 days
comparison of the prothrombin time of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
Time frame: 14 days
Comparison of the aspartate transaminase of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
Time frame: 14 days
The safety of the study medication will also assessed by a comparison of the alanine transaminase of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients)
Time frame: 14 days
comparing Albumin of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
Time frame: 14 days
comparing the Alkaline Phosphatase of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
Time frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the serum Lactate Dehydrogenase level of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
Time frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the serum C-Reactive Protein level of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
Time frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by changes in the SARS CoV-2 viral loads among mid-turbinate nasal swabs taken on days 0, 4, 7 and 14.
Time frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the Adj. EGFR of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
Time frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the APTT of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
Time frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the INR of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients). The INR is a result of a blood test that measures how long it takes for blood to clot, also known as the prothrombin time (PT). The INR is calculated by comparing the PT to the mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT).
Time frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the ESR of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
Time frame: 14 days
Symptom severity was assessed via a daily questionnaire across Days 0-14, where participants rated their symptoms on a scale of 0 (none or absent) to 3 (severe). A composite measure was created for each day, based on the 12 symptoms most commonly associated with COVID-19 (fever, fatigue, muscle aches, shortness of breath, shortness of breath upon exertion, cough, sore throat, stuffy nose, runny nose, loss of taste, loss of smell, headache), and counting the total number of symptoms present. scores of 1 or more were considered to be present.
Time frame: 14 days
Symptom severity was assessed via a daily questionnaire across Days 0-14, where participants rated their symptoms on a scale of 0 (none or absent) to 3 (severe). A composite measure was created for each day, based on the 12 symptoms most commonly associated with COVID-19 (fever, fatigue, muscle aches, shortness of breath, shortness of breath upon exertion, cough, sore throat, stuffy nose, runny nose, loss of taste, loss of smell, headache), and summing the total symptom severities. Higher symptom severities indicates a worse outcome. The minimum and maximum were: 0 to 36, respectively.
Gordon Saxe
Other
Multicenter Double Blind, Placebo Controlled RCT of Fomitopsis Officinalis and Trametes Versicolor to Treat COVID-19
Acronym: MACH19
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04794829
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07552779
COVID-19, COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07722000
COVID-19, Chronic Disease
Banī Suwayf, Beni Suweif Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04371432
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details