Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre, 2610, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT05789095
Osgood-Schlatter is a growth-related condition involving multiple different types of tissue in the tendon-bone interface at the tibial tubercle. Osgood-Schlatter affects one in ten adolescents causing persistent pain and reduced ability to maintain physical activities. Changes in rate of torque development is associated with decreased neuromuscular functioning and pain chronicity, thereby affecting athletic performances and general physical activities. However, changes in rate of torque development has not been investigate in patients with Osgood-Schlatter and could help characterize the condition and guide management.
The aim of the study is to investigate early and peak rate of torque development during maximal voluntary isometric knee extension and knee flexion in adolescents with Osgood-Schlatter, compared to a matched group of asymptomatic adolescents (controls), in a cross-sectional study.
The study will include 13 adolescent participants with Osgood-Schlatter and a group of 13 pain free controls matched on sex, age, and sports participation on the group level. Testing will include rate of torque measurements of knee extension and flexion for each limb with a fixated handheld dynamometer during a single test-session lasting approximately two hours. The examiner responsible for strength-testing will be blinded to case-status. Along with anthropometric data, participants will perform the anterior knee pain provocation test to assess pain-response to sustained knee loading, a countermovement jump test to assess power and jump height, and provide patient-reported measures of condition severity, pain, disability, and quality of life. Data collection will start March 2023 and is expected to finish by May 2023.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me9 year–16 year
All sexes
Observational
Hvidovre, 2610, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants and their parents/guardian receives information about the test procedures. Written informed consent is obtained before clinical examination and testing.
Clinical testing is performed, anthropometric values are obtained and patient reported outcome measure is filled out, before the tests are performed. Cases will receive treatment for their condition and controls a movie ticket as compensation.
Time frame: Day 1
Test performed seated on an examination bed with a belt-fixated handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) at 60 degrees of knee flexion during a 5 second maximal exertion.
Time frame: Day 1
Test performed seated on an examination bed with a belt-fixated handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) at 60 degrees of knee flexion during a 5 second maximal exertion.
Time frame: Day 1
Test performed seated on an examination bed with a belt-fixated handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) at 60 degrees of knee flexion during a 5 second maximal exertion.
Time frame: Day 1
Test performed seated on an examination bed with a belt-fixated handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) at 60 degrees of knee flexion during a 5 second maximal exertion.
Time frame: Day 1
Test performed seated on an examination bed with a belt-fixated handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) at 20 degrees of knee flexion during a 5 second maximal exertion.
Time frame: Day 1
Test performed seated on an examination bed with a belt-fixated handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) at 20 degrees of knee flexion during a 5 second maximal exertion.
Time frame: Day 1
Test performed seated on an examination bed with a belt-fixated handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) at 20 degrees of knee flexion during a 5 second maximal exertion.
Time frame: Day 1
Numerical Pain Rating scale, 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable.
Time frame: Day 1
The scale contains 7 questions answered through a 0-4 likert scale. The scale is normalized to a 0-100 score, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems.
In this study participants will fill out questions from the subscales "sport/rec", "quality of life" and question P1, P4, P6b and P6b from the "pain" subscale.
Time frame: Day 1
The Tampa Scale is a 17-item questionnaire to evaluate fear avoidance behaviour in patients experiencing pain. It consists of two subscales on activity avoidance and somatic focus. The questions are rated on a 1-4 likert scale by the patient. The sum of the points are ranged from 17-68, with above 37 points being defined as "high level" of kinesiophobia.
Time frame: Day 1
Participants self-reported duration of pain denoted in months
Time frame: Day 1
The perceived pain in the last week, rated on the Numerical Pain Rating scale, 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable.
Time frame: Day 1
The perceived pain in the last 24 hours, rated on the Numerical Pain Rating scale, 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable.
Time frame: Day 1
The participants current pain on the Numerical Pain Rating scale, 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable.
Time frame: Day 1
The participants will perform three trials of a countermovement jump which will be recorded on a smartphone camera (>240 frames per second). Subsequently, it will be analyzed for jump height using the MyJump 2 smartphone application.
Time frame: Day 1
The participants will perform three trials of a countermovement jump which will be recorded on a smartphone camera (>240 frames per second). Subsequently, it will be analyzed for power (W) using the MyJump 2 smartphone application.
Time frame: Day 1
The participants will perform three trials of a countermovement jump. The pain during each jump will be rated on the 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating scale, 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable.
Time frame: Day 1
The participants will perform the Anterior Knee Pain Provocation test and rate the pain on the 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale before and after the test. Only the affected knee is tested. For controls, the affected knee will be decided by coin toss.
Time frame: Day 1
Participants are asked if they perform either 1) at a higher level than before onset of knee pain, 2) at the same level as before onset of knee pain, or 3) at a lower level than before onset of knee pain
Time frame: Day 1
Participants are asked if they are either 1) more physically active than before onset of knee pain, 2) just as physically active as before onset of knee pain, or 3) are less physically active as before onset of knee pain
Hvidovre University Hospital
Other
Rate of Torque Development in Adolescents With Osgood-Schlatter: A Cross-sectional Case-control Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07590128
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Batna City, Batna, Algeria
View Trial DetailsNCT06993363
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05174182
Apophysitis, Behavior
Hvidovre, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04716608
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Basel, Switzerland
View Trial Details